Palisade vs EmailAuth.io
EmailAuth.io vs Palisade in 2026
EmailAuth.io combines DMARC reporting with threat investigation, alerts, BIMI, and security-integration options. Palisade is agentic: its AI agent investigates senders, prepares authentication fixes, and carries domains toward enforcement with your approval.
Our verdict: EmailAuth.io is a quote-led email-authentication product with DMARC reporting, investigation context, alerts, BIMI, and public API/STIX/TAXII integration language, plus SaaS and on-premise deployment options. Pick EmailAuth.io if those security-led options suit a team that will confirm scope with sales. Pick Palisade if you want an AI agent to investigate senders, prepare SPF and DKIM fixes, and carry domains to p=reject with your approval.
Samuel Chenard · CEO & Co-Founder, PalisadeSource checks through 2026-08-261 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
Grok
Palisade
Palisade is free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Which one is right for you?
Best for Security teams that need threat investigation or on-premise deployment
Best for MSPs and IT teams responsible for multiple domains
- You want EmailAuth.io's Threat Map, IP investigation context, and configurable threat alerts alongside DMARC reporting.
- You need an on-premise deployment option as well as the SaaS application described on EmailAuth.io's homepage.
- Your security stack can consume API or STIX/TAXII data, and you want EmailAuth.io's SOAR-oriented integration path.
- You are comfortable requesting a tailored plan because EmailAuth.io does not publish a public rate card or named plan limits.
- You want an AI agent to investigate every sender, draft SPF and DKIM fixes, and propose each policy step toward p=reject for approval.
- You want hosted SPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS records on redundant managed DNS, or Smart DNS Deployment through your DNS provider.
- You manage client domains and need native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrations with portfolio-based MSP pricing.
- You want published IT-team pricing, free unlimited domain adding, and a 15-day full-product trial without a credit card.
Free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Where the day-to-day work actually differs
| Feature | EmailAuth.io | Palisade |
|---|---|---|
| Enforcement and setup | ||
| AI agent that investigates senders and carries approved SPF, DKIM, and DMARC steps toward p=rejectWhether the product investigates senders and prepares approved authentication and policy work.EmailAuth.io describes automated setup and a free demo, but its public product pages do not advertise an agent that investigates senders, drafts fixes, and carries each policy step to p=reject (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | No agent advertised | Agent drafts and proposes |
| Guided SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record creation and setupWhether the product helps create and set up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records.EmailAuth.io publishes a personalised DMARC-record flow, setup guidance for SPF and DKIM, and links to its record generator and validators. Source (2026-08-26) | Personalized setup guidance | Agent drafts proposed records |
| Reporting and investigation | ||
| DMARC aggregate report monitoring and analyticsWhether DMARC aggregate reports are collected and shown as sender activity.The product and benefits pages describe DMARC report visibility, authorized and unauthorized sending sources, and report analysis. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Source and report analysis | Agent analyzes reports |
| Threat map with IP reputation and investigation contextWhether the product maps suspicious IPs with reputation and investigation details.EmailAuth.io advertises a DMARC Threat Map and investigation for forward/reverse DNS match, IP Whois, and spam listings. Source (2026-08-26) | Threat Map investigations | Not listed |
| Configurable alerts for email-authentication threatsWhether alerts can notify operators about email-authentication threats.EmailAuth.io says users can configure threat alerts and receive notifications for alarming potential risks to a domain. Source (2026-08-26) | Configurable threat alerts | New-ticket alerts |
| Periodic DMARC progress reportsWhether recurring reports summarize DMARC progress across selected periods.EmailAuth.io describes weekly, monthly, and annual reports based on processed DMARC reports. Source (2026-08-26) | Weekly to annual reports | Periodic progress reports |
| Authentication and DNS | ||
| BIMI support alongside email authenticationWhether the product supports BIMI as part of email-authentication work.EmailAuth.io presents BIMI as a product surface for authenticated brand visibility. Source (2026-08-26) | BIMI product surface | Hosted BIMI record |
| Hosted SPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS recordsWhether the provider hosts the listed email-authentication records.EmailAuth.io's setup guide directs the operator to add a TXT record at the registrar or DNS provider; hosted records for these protocols are not advertised on the public pages checked (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Not advertised | CNAME-delegated hosted records |
| Customer-authorized DNS deployment that writes approved records to the providerWhether approved records can be written to the customer's DNS provider.The public setup guide tells the operator to log in to the registrar or DNS provider and add the record manually; a customer-authorized DNS connection is not advertised (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Manual DNS changes | Customer-approved DNS deployment |
| SPF flatteningWhether SPF lookups are flattened to stay within DNS lookup limits.SPF flattening is not advertised on EmailAuth.io's public homepage, features page, or setup guide (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26) | Not advertised | One-lookup hosted SPF |
| Operations and integrations | ||
| API-based security integrations and indicator sharingWhether security data and indicators can move to other platforms through APIs.EmailAuth.io describes API and STIX/TAXII-based integrations that share indicators of compromise with other platforms in real time. Source (2026-08-26) | API and STIX/TAXII | API on every plan |
| Named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrationsWhether named PSA platforms integrate with client-management workflows.EmailAuth.io's public features page names API and STIX/TAXII integrations but does not advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Not advertised | Native PSA integrations |
| AI and automation access | ||
| Documented REST or GraphQL API reference for customer-built integrationsWhether customers can build against a published API reference.EmailAuth.io advertises API and STIX/TAXII-based integrations, but does not advertise a customer-facing REST or GraphQL API reference on its public features, page-sitemap, or DMARC-tool pages (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27) | No public API reference | REST API published |
| MCP server for connecting AI assistants to domain dataWhether an AI assistant can reach the product's data directly.EmailAuth.io does not advertise an MCP server or an AI-assistant integration on its public features or page-sitemap pages (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | No MCP server listed | MCP server published |
| Advertised AI or machine-learning features inside the productWhether the vendor describes AI or machine learning as a product capability.EmailAuth.io does not advertise a product AI or machine-learning feature on its public features page (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | No product AI listed | Approval-gated agent work |
| Automated data delivery through exports, webhooks, or a feedWhether data can leave the product automatically without a dashboard download.EmailAuth.io says reports can be downloaded for a selected timeline, but does not advertise scheduled exports, webhooks, or a data feed on its public features page (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | No automated export listed | API data access |
Want to compare the workflow yourself? Try Palisade free with one domain and up to 1,000 emails a month.
Palisade 96 vs EmailAuth.io 30, and why
Both products are scored on the same eight dimensions the comparison hub uses, so the figures here are the figures there. Four are derived from vendor facts that each carry a source and a checked date. Four are editorial, marked as such below, and each states its reasoning and its source.
Each dimension is out of 10 and the total is the raw sum out of 80, rescaled to 100 — the raw figure is printed beside it so the conversion is checkable rather than a black box. Scored on what each vendor publishes, not on how the product feels in use. Editorial dimensions last reviewed 2026-08-30.
How reachable the product is from your own software and AI tools. 10 = a documented API on every plan plus a published MCP server. 6 = an API, gated to a tier or to a sales conversation. 3 = no programmatic access advertised.
EmailAuth.io advertises API and STIX/TAXII integrations, but publishes neither customer API documentation nor an MCP server (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28)
Palisade publishes a REST API and a remote MCP server on every plan, making the same domain data and remediation workflows available to connected software. Source (2026-08-30)
How much of the report analysis is done for you. 10 = the platform turns raw report data into a prioritised, actionable queue on its own.
EmailAuth collects RUA and RUF data and tracks enforcement, but the public site does not expose a detailed analysis or remediation automation matrix. Source (2026-08-28)
Report data is analysed into a prioritised list of sender, SPF, DKIM and DMARC issues, so nobody reads raw XML. Source (2026-07-29)
How much of the work the vendor's own software does. 10 = it identifies the sending sources, drafts the SPF and DKIM fixes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step. 6 = it applies the records for you, but a person decides what to fix and when to advance. 3 = it reports, and every change is yours to make. A vendor whose team does the work rather than its software scores here on the software alone.
The setup guide directs domain admins to identify sending sources and publish SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records in their own DNS. Source (2026-08-28)
The agent investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes it needs, and proposes the next policy step; a human approves before deployment. Source (2026-08-30)
10 = full pricing published. 6 = some tiers published, rest quote-gated. 3 = quote only.
No public numeric service price list was located in the reviewed official material. Source (2026-08-28)
Published: free plan, then flat monthly plans by email volume from $19/mo Source (2026-08-30)
10 = hosts the records for you. 6 = partial or add-on. 3 = you manage your own DNS.
The site advertises automated setup and SaaS or on-premise deployment, but does not clearly document hosted record delegation. Source (2026-08-28)
10 = a genuine free plan. 6 = time-limited trial only. 3 = no free access.
Free record-checking and generation tools are published, but no ongoing free monitoring platform tier is documented. Source (2026-08-28)
Free plan: one domain, up to 1,000 emails/mo, 14-day report history, no credit card, plus a 15-day full-product trial Source (2026-08-30)
10 = a real MSP program with multi-tenant management. 6 = partial. 3 = none.
No public MSP, reseller, or multi-tenant partner programme was located. Source (2026-08-28)
How much work it takes to get a domain from p=none to p=reject. 10 = the platform (or the vendor's team) gets you there without manual DNS edits.
The service advertises automated setup and implementation assistance across DMARC, SPF, and DKIM, while hosted-record details are not public. Source (2026-08-28)
The DMARC Agent detects when a domain's authentication and alignment are ready for the next policy stage and proposes the move, but a human still approves and applies it, so it is not fully hands-off. Source (2026-07-29)
Guided setup vs DNS ownership
EmailAuth.io's one-click setup promise still leaves the DNS edit with your team
EmailAuth.io's homepage presents DMARC, SPF, and DKIM protection as a one-click starting point and offers both a SaaS application and an on-premise deployment. Its detailed setup guide then walks the operator through creating a TXT record, signing in to the registrar or DNS provider, and adding the record. That is a guided setup path: EmailAuth.io helps produce the record and explains the steps, while the customer remains responsible for the DNS edit. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
Palisade is built around a different handoff. Its AI agent investigates the senders behind the report, prepares SPF and DKIM work, and proposes each DMARC policy step. Your team remains the approval gate, but the recurring investigation and fix preparation do not stay as a manual checklist. That distinction matters most when the same process repeats across a portfolio.
- No agent advertised
- Personalized setup guidance
- Agent drafts and proposes
- Agent drafts proposed records
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Investigation context vs remediation
EmailAuth.io's Threat Map adds investigation context to a DMARC report
EmailAuth.io says its dashboard turns processed DMARC reports into plain-English answers and downloadable reports for a chosen timeline. Its Threat Map is positioned as a way to identify potentially malicious IPs, and the features page names additional investigation such as forward/reverse DNS matching, IP Whois, and spam-listing checks. The product therefore covers more than a raw XML inbox, with threat context and recurring alerts around the evidence. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
That is real parity on the evidence layer. A team that wants analysts to inspect report data, investigate suspicious infrastructure, and receive threat notifications can find those surfaces in EmailAuth.io's public product description. Palisade's advantage is downstream: its agent turns sender evidence into proposed authentication work and a policy path that an operator can approve, instead of stopping at the investigation view.
- Source and report analysis
- Threat Map investigations
- Configurable threat alerts
- Agent analyzes reports
- Not listed
- New-ticket alerts
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Quote-led pricing vs published tiers
What EmailAuth.io publishes about pricing, deployment, and scale
EmailAuth.io's public buying path is a free-demo or contact conversation. The site asks for company and domain details, and the setup guide refers to tailor-made services with a customized plan and quote. It does not publish a rate card, named plan tiers, domain ceilings, volume bands, retention windows, or overage rules. That does not tell you what a custom proposal cannot include; it tells you which questions a buyer must take to sales before comparing total cost. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26)
The deployment choice is more explicit than the commercial model. EmailAuth.io advertises both SaaS and on-premise options, which can matter to a security team with a specific data-residency or procurement requirement. Palisade's public model is easier to price for an IT team: a free starting plan, volume-sized monthly tiers, defined setup-domain allowances, and a separate portfolio-based MSP offer. The right comparison is not a guessed EmailAuth.io number against a Palisade number. Ask for the same domain count, sending volume, retention, deployment, support, and implementation scope in writing.
What each side charges
Three points on each published range: the cheapest plan, one in the middle, and the top of what the vendor publishes. Every plan on both sides is in the pricing section further down.
- EmailAuth SuiteNot published: request a free demo or quote
Public pages describe DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and BIMI support, SaaS and on-premise deployment options, threat investigation, alerts, and API or STIX/TAXII integration language; plan limits and included service scope require confirmation
- Free$0
1 domain, your own, capped at 1,000 emails/mo
- IT teams: up to 500,000 emails/mo$59/mo ($47/mo billed annually)
Same product: 6 set-up domains, pick the tier that matches your sending
- Enterprise (more than 2.5M / month)Custom
Custom volume, retention, and terms
- Manual DNS changes
- Not advertised
- Not advertised
- Customer-approved DNS deployment
- CNAME-delegated hosted records
- One-lookup hosted SPF
Security workflow vs MSP operations
EmailAuth.io's SOAR language is useful for security teams, while PSA coverage stays unverified
EmailAuth.io's features page describes SOAR capability and says the product can use API or STIX/TAXII-based integrations to share indicators of compromise with other platforms in real time. That gives a security-led team a documented integration direction, especially if the requirement is to move threat data into an existing security workflow rather than keep it in a DMARC dashboard. Source (2026-08-26)
The same public material does not name ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask. Treat that as an unanswered MSP integration question, not proof that a custom connector is impossible. Palisade publishes those three native PSA integrations, multi-tenant client management, white-label reporting, and portfolio-based client-domain pricing. If your work is organized around tickets, client handoff, and repeatable remediation, confirm EmailAuth.io's tenant model and connector scope before treating its SOAR description as equivalent to an MSP operating workflow.
Native PSA integrations
Palisade imports client domains straight from these three. EmailAuth.io's own coverage is stated above, from their site.
- ConnectWise PSA
- Autotask
- HaloPSA
- API and STIX/TAXII
- Not advertised
- API on every plan
- Native PSA integrations
Dashboard access vs programmatic access
EmailAuth.io advertises API integrations, not a public API reference or MCP server
EmailAuth.io says its SOAR capability can use API or STIX/TAXII-based integrations to share indicators of compromise with other platforms in real time. Its public features page also says report answers can be downloaded for a selected timeline. The current public page sitemap does not list a developer portal, API reference, or integrations index, and the public DMARC page at api.emailauth.io is a lookup and record generator rather than a customer API reference. EmailAuth.io does not advertise an MCP server, an AI-assistant connection, product AI or machine-learning features, scheduled exports, webhooks, or a data feed on those public pages (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27)
Palisade publishes an MCP server and a REST API. Its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step. A human approves before anything ships.
Reachable from your own AI tools
Palisade's MCP server exposes 30 tools over OAuth, so the assistant your team already uses can read domains, pull the exact records to publish and work the task queue. These are the clients the connection guide walks through.
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Cursor
- Windsurf
- Any MCP client
- No public API reference
- No MCP server listed
- No product AI listed
- REST API published
- MCP server published
- Approval-gated agent work
Still deciding between EmailAuth.io and Palisade? See what changes with Palisade.
1 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
Microsoft 365
Zoho Mail
The agent does the heavy lifting
Sources identified, SPF and DKIM fixes drafted, each policy step proposed. You approve; nothing ships on its own.
Connect your AI with MCP
30 tools over MCP, so your assistant reads your domains and works the queue.
Connect your DNS manager directly
Approved records go into your own zone at your own provider, across 64. No credentials reach us.
“We evaluated many DMARC providers before choosing Palisade. The quality of their product, the responsiveness and friendliness of their team and their rapid progress on their product roadmap made it a no-brainer for us to move forward.”
EmailAuth.io pricing explained (and how Palisade compares)
EmailAuth.io does not publish a public rate card. Its site offers a free demo, and its setup guide mentions tailor-made services with a customized plan and quote. The /pricing URL returned 404 when checked on 2026-08-26, so the row below describes the public buying path rather than estimating a price.
What you'd actually pay
The same five buyer sizes on every comparison, so a shape carries from one page to the next.
1 domain, up to 1,000 emails a month
2 set-up domains, up to 100K emails a month
10 set-up domains, up to 1M emails a month
20 set-up domains, up to 2.5M emails a month
Client domains under management, any volume
Palisade’s figures are derived from its published tiers. EmailAuth.io figures read from their pricing page on 2026-08-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
How EmailAuth.io prices
- No public pricing page or monetary rate card was available on the EmailAuth.io pages checked on 2026-08-26; /pricing returned 404.
- EmailAuth.io advertises a free demo, but the public site does not state a self-serve free-plan limit, trial length, report-retention window, or email-volume allowance (checked 2026-08-26).
- The setup guide mentions tailor-made DMARC services and a customized plan and quote. It does not publish a per-domain, per-user, or volume-based price (checked 2026-08-26).
- The public pages do not publish overage rules, annual discounts, named plan tiers, or a separate MSP rate card (checked 2026-08-26).
How Palisade prices
- Palisade publishes a Free plan for one domain and up to 1,000 emails per month, plus flat monthly IT-team plans sized by sending volume from $19/month. Annual billing is 20% lower.
- Paid IT tiers include a defined number of set-up domains by volume tier. Adding domains is free and unlimited; only domains you set up count against the tier.
- MSPs pay per client domain, with a rate that improves as the portfolio grows. Client email volume is not metered, and the MSP's own domain is included as a free Not-For-Resale license.
- Palisade offers a 15-day full-product trial without a credit card. Free keeps 14 days of report history, paid plans have unlimited retention, and API access is available on every plan.
EmailAuth.io pricing read from their public pricing page on 2026-08-26.Plans and prices may have changed since.
Try Palisade free on one domain, or start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
What each one covers, and where it stops
Published facts only, read from each vendor's own material. Neither column describes a hands-on trial, because we have not run one.
EmailAuth.io combines DMARC reporting with threat investigation, alerts, BIMI, and API or STIX/TAXII-based security integrations. It is aimed at security teams that need investigation context alongside reporting and can use either the SaaS application or an on-premise deployment described on its public pages.
Its setup guide directs operators through DMARC record creation and manual DNS changes, while its Threat Map adds IP and DNS investigation context to report data. The public buying path is a free demo or customized quote rather than a published rate card.
Palisade is built around an agent that does the DMARC work rather than reporting on it. It identifies every sending source, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step when the evidence supports it.
The agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step, you approve before anything ships.
- Provides personalized SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record setup guidance
- Provides source and report analysis for DMARC data
- Provides Threat Map investigations with IP reputation and investigation context
- Provides configurable threat alerts
- Supports API and STIX/TAXII-based indicator sharing
- The agent investigates senders and drafts the fix, so the work arrives prepared rather than as a list of findings
- Hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC on redundant managed DNS, so an approved change can be carried out rather than handed off
- Portfolio workflow for MSPs, with ConnectWise, HaloPSA and Autotask integrations and a free NFR domain
- An MCP server and a REST API, so the same data and workflow are reachable from the AI tools a team already uses
- Does not advertise an agent that investigates senders and carries approved SPF, DKIM, and DMARC steps toward p=reject
- Does not advertise hosted SPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS records
- Does not advertise a customer-authorized DNS deployment that writes approved records to the provider
- Does not advertise SPF flattening
- Does not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrations
- Every policy change waits for a human approval, by design: nothing ships on the agent's own authority
- MSP pricing is quoted per client domain rather than published as a rate card
- Plans are sized by monthly email volume, so a low-domain, high-volume sender lands on a higher tier than domain count alone suggests
- Starts at
- Not published: request a free demo or quote
- Free tier
- No self-serve free-plan limit published
- Deployment
- SaaS and on-premise
- Rate card
- Not published; /pricing returned 404
- MSP model
- No separate MSP rate card published
- Starts at
- Free, then $19/mo
- Free tier
- 1 domain, up to 1,000 emails/month
- Trial
- 15 days, full product, no credit card
- MSP model
- Quoted per client domain, portfolio-based
“Palisade made it so easy for us to get our blue verified checkmark and achieve our BIMI compliance”
Sources and further reading
Source checks run through 2026-08-26; every entry keeps its individual check date.
- EmailAuth.io homepage: product scope, BIMI, SaaS, and on-premise options
Checked 2026-08-26
- EmailAuth.io features: Threat Map, investigation, alerts, reports, and SOAR integrations
Checked 2026-08-26
- EmailAuth.io DMARC setup guides: record creation and DNS workflow
Checked 2026-08-26
- EmailAuth.io DMARC benefits: reporting visibility and free tools
Checked 2026-08-26
- EmailAuth.io free demo: public buying path
Checked 2026-08-26
- EmailAuth.io contact page: quote and service inquiry form
Checked 2026-08-26
- EmailAuth.io robots file: public sitemap locations and restricted paths
Checked 2026-08-27
- EmailAuth.io sitemap index: current public sitemap inventory
Checked 2026-08-27
- EmailAuth.io features: API and STIX/TAXII integration language, downloadable reports, and product-feature scope
Checked 2026-08-27
- EmailAuth.io public page sitemap: listed product, guide, tool, and contact pages
Checked 2026-08-27
- EmailAuth.io public DMARC tool: record lookup and generator
Checked 2026-08-27
Palisade vs EmailAuth.io: FAQ
What is the main difference between EmailAuth.io and Palisade?
EmailAuth.io publicly describes DMARC reporting, threat investigation, alerts, authentication setup guidance, BIMI, and security integrations. Palisade adds an agentic operating model: its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step toward p=reject while your team approves before anything ships. The choice is mainly about who carries the recurring remediation work.
Does EmailAuth.io support DMARC reporting and analysis?
Yes. EmailAuth.io says it reads and processes DMARC reports, provides visibility into authorized and unauthorized sending sources, offers downloadable reports, and publishes weekly, monthly, and annual progress reporting. Its features page also describes Threat Map and investigation context for items such as IP Whois and spam listings (checked 2026-08-26).
Does EmailAuth.io offer SaaS and on-premise deployment?
Yes. EmailAuth.io's homepage lists both an on-premise deployment and a SaaS application. The public page does not explain the commercial or infrastructure boundaries of each option, so confirm data handling, support, upgrades, and implementation scope for the deployment you are considering (checked 2026-08-26).
What does EmailAuth.io cost?
EmailAuth.io does not publish a public rate card or plan limits. Its site offers a free demo, and its setup guide mentions tailor-made services with a customized plan and quote. The /pricing URL returned 404 on 2026-08-26. Request a quote using the same domain count, sending volume, retention, deployment, and support assumptions you use for Palisade.
Does EmailAuth.io integrate with ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask?
EmailAuth.io's public features page describes API and STIX/TAXII-based integrations, but it does not name ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask. That is an unverified fit question, not a claim that a custom integration is unavailable. Palisade publishes native integrations with all three PSA platforms (checked 2026-08-26).
Can I run EmailAuth.io and Palisade during a migration?
Yes. DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so both platforms can receive reports during an evaluation period. Keep the DNS and policy owner clear, compare the sender findings, and retire the old reporting path only after your team is comfortable with the new workflow.
Switching from EmailAuth.io takes three steps
- 1
Inventory the current report destination
List each domain, its DMARC rua and ruf destinations, the senders already identified in EmailAuth.io, and any manual DNS changes still in flight.
- 2
Run the reporting paths in parallel
DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so you can add Palisade alongside EmailAuth.io during an evaluation window. Compare sender evidence while keeping one clear owner for each DNS and policy change.
- 3
Approve the new DNS and policy path
Let Palisade's agent prepare the authentication work, review each proposed change, and move the reporting and hosted-record path over when your team is satisfied with the evidence.
Our onboarding team handles the technical transition with you.
Competitor information on this page was last reviewed against public sources on 2026-08-26. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.