Palisade vs spfXio
spfXio vs Palisade in 2026
spfXio is a managed and SaaS email-authentication platform built around SPF macro expansion, SPF/DKIM/DMARC record management, and report analysis. Palisade is agentic: its AI agent investigates senders, drafts authentication fixes, and proposes each enforcement step for your approval.
Our verdict: Pick spfXio if your team wants a managed-service relationship for SPF macro expansion, authentication-record administration, report analysis, and scheduled review artifacts. Pick Palisade if you want an AI agent to investigate each sender, prepare SPF and DKIM fixes, and carry domains toward p=reject with your team approving every step. The practical choice is managed guidance versus executed, approval-gated work.
Samuel Chenard · CEO & Co-Founder, PalisadeSource checks through 2026-08-261 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
Grok
Palisade
Palisade is free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Which one is right for you?
Best for Teams wanting a managed-service relationship
Best for MSPs and IT teams responsible for multiple domains
- You want a specialist managed service centered on SPF macro expansion and centralized SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record management.
- You prefer a dedicated account manager and recurring quarterly or monthly report reviews as part of the service plan.
- Your organization fits spfXio's published managed-service limits, or you are prepared to ask sales for customized domains, retention, and report limits.
- You want an AI agent to investigate sending sources, draft SPF and DKIM fixes, and propose each policy step so your team approves before anything ships.
- You manage internal or client domains and need an operational workflow that scales across a portfolio rather than a small fixed domain allowance.
- You want hosted SPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS records on redundant managed DNS, plus native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask workflows for MSP operations.
Free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Where the day-to-day work actually differs
| Feature | spfXio | Palisade |
|---|---|---|
| Enforcement & remediation | ||
| AI agent that investigates senders, drafts SPF/DKIM fixes, and carries domains toward p=rejectWhether an agent prepares sender fixes and policy steps for approval.spfXio advertises managed guidance, record management, actionable insights, and review artifacts, but its public product and pricing pages do not advertise an AI agent that executes the enforcement workflow (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26) | No agent advertised | Agent drafts and proposes |
| DMARC policy management and report analysisWhether the service manages DMARC policy and analyzes aggregate reports.spfXio lists DMARC Policy Management & Reporting and says its platform analyzes DMARC reports and provides actionable intelligence (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Policy management and reports | Agent analyzes reports |
| SPF, DKIM & DMARC controls | ||
| SPF macro expansion for a virtually unlimited number of authorized sendersWhether SPF can accommodate many authorized third-party sending services.spfXio describes SPF Macro Expansion as its approach to the SPF 10-lookup limit and says organizations can authorize a virtually unlimited number of third-party senders (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Expands SPF references | Hosted SPF flattening |
| SPF record managementWhether a service manages the SPF record required for sending authorization.SPF Record Management is included in each published managed-service tier (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Included in every tier | Agent drafts SPF fixes |
| DKIM record managementWhether a service manages DKIM records that sign email.DKIM Record Management is included in each published managed-service tier (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Included in every tier | Agent drafts DKIM fixes |
| Centralized management of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC recordsWhether one service manages SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records together.spfXio describes a hosted email-authentication solution and a centralized platform for managing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Centralized record management | Hosted on managed DNS |
| Monitoring & investigation | ||
| Near-real-time global visibility into email fraudWhether operators can see suspected email-fraud activity across sending sources.The homepage lists near-real-time global visibility into email fraud as one of the platform's benefits (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Near-live fraud view | Agent investigates senders |
| Real-time Domain Inspector for DMARC and SPF configuration errorsWhether configuration errors in DMARC and SPF records can be detected.spfXio's Tools page describes Domain Inspector as a real-time evaluation of DMARC and SPF configurations that detects errors and provides helpful hints (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Real-time error detection | Agent monitors records |
| Free comparative analysis of a domain's DMARC and SPF configurationWhether a domain's DMARC and SPF configuration can be compared with peers.The vendor advertises a free Domain Comparative Analysis comparing a domain's SPF and DMARC configuration with others in its industry (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Free industry comparison | Agent investigates configuration |
| Operations & support | ||
| Dedicated account manager and recurring report reviewWhether recurring reports and named operational support are available.Quartz MS and Diamond MS list a dedicated account manager and quarterly report review; Platinum MS lists a dedicated account manager and monthly report review (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Account manager and reviews | Agent analyzes reports |
| Native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrationsWhether named PSA tools connect to email-authentication workflows.spfXio's public homepage, product page, pricing page, and tools navigation do not advertise named PSA or ticketing integrations (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26) Source 4 (2026-08-26) | No named PSA integrations | Native PSA integrations |
| Hosted records on redundant managed DNSWhether hosted records run on redundant managed DNS infrastructure.spfXio describes a hosted email-authentication solution and record management, but its public product and pricing pages do not advertise hosted records on redundant managed DNS (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26) | Redundancy not advertised | Redundant managed DNS |
| AI and automation access | ||
| MCP server for connecting AI assistants to domain dataWhether an AI assistant can reach the product's data directly.spfXio's public homepage, management-platform, tools, and free-trial pages do not advertise an MCP server or an AI-assistant integration (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27) Source 4 (2026-08-27) | No MCP server listed | MCP server published |
| Documented REST or GraphQL API for programmatic accessWhether software can manage the product through documented endpoints.spfXio's public homepage, management-platform, pricing, tools, and free-trial pages do not advertise a documented customer REST or GraphQL API (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27) Source 4 (2026-08-27) Source 5 (2026-08-27) | No public API listed | REST API published |
| Advertised AI features for authentication operationsWhether the product advertises AI or machine-learning features inside its workflow.spfXio's public product and free-trial pages describe managed guidance, report analysis, expert insights, and service-plan advice, but do not advertise AI or machine-learning features inside the product (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | No AI features listed | Agent drafts and proposes |
| Domain limits & scaling | ||
| Fixed-price plan for more than three domainsWhether a buyer can price a portfolio above three domains without contacting sales.spfXio's pricing page lists Quartz MS and Diamond MS at up to three domains. Platinum MS lists customized domains with Ask Sales pricing, so the page does not advertise a fixed-price tier above three domains (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28) | Ask sales above 3 domains | Published tiers up to 20 |
| Published usage allowances on fixed-price plansHow each product meters authentication traffic on plans with listed prices.Quartz MS lists up to 75,000 SPF requests, 50,000 DKIM requests, and 25,000 DMARC reported emails; Diamond MS lists up to 150,000 SPF requests, 100,000 DKIM requests, and 50,000 DMARC reported emails (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28) | Three protocol-specific caps | Monthly email volume |
| Advertised MSP pricing model based on client domainsWhether an MSP can see the commercial meter used for client portfolios.spfXio's public pricing page lists managed-service plans for organizations, each with a domain limit. Its homepage and management platform page advertise managed-service and SaaS delivery but do not advertise an MSP pricing model based on client domains (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28) Source 2 (2026-08-28) Source 3 (2026-08-28) | No MSP model advertised | Per client domain |
Want to compare the workflow yourself? Try Palisade free with one domain and up to 1,000 emails a month.
Palisade 96 vs spfXio 56, and why
Both products are scored on the same eight dimensions the comparison hub uses, so the figures here are the figures there. Four are derived from vendor facts that each carry a source and a checked date. Four are editorial, marked as such below, and each states its reasoning and its source.
Each dimension is out of 10 and the total is the raw sum out of 80, rescaled to 100 — the raw figure is printed beside it so the conversion is checkable rather than a black box. Scored on what each vendor publishes, not on how the product feels in use. Editorial dimensions last reviewed 2026-08-30.
How reachable the product is from your own software and AI tools. 10 = a documented API on every plan plus a published MCP server. 6 = an API, gated to a tier or to a sales conversation. 3 = no programmatic access advertised.
The published plans list managed records, reporting, authentication, account management, and reviews but no API or MCP server, so spfXio does not advertise programmatic access (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28)
Palisade publishes a REST API and a remote MCP server on every plan, making the same domain data and remediation workflows available to connected software. Source (2026-08-30)
How much of the report analysis is done for you. 10 = the platform turns raw report data into a prioritised, actionable queue on its own.
Macro expansion and global reporting automate record-scale and visibility tasks, while scheduled human reviews remain central to the service model. Source (2026-08-28)
Report data is analysed into a prioritised list of sender, SPF, DKIM and DMARC issues, so nobody reads raw XML. Source (2026-07-29)
How much of the work the vendor's own software does. 10 = it identifies the sending sources, drafts the SPF and DKIM fixes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step. 6 = it applies the records for you, but a person decides what to fix and when to advance. 3 = it reports, and every change is yours to make. A vendor whose team does the work rather than its software scores here on the software alone.
spfXio hosts and updates SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records through its platform, while experts and account managers decide what to fix and when to advance policy. Source (2026-08-28)
The agent investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes it needs, and proposes the next policy step; a human approves before deployment. Source (2026-08-30)
10 = full pricing published. 6 = some tiers published, rest quote-gated. 3 = quote only.
Quartz MS is $299 monthly and Diamond MS is $499 monthly; Platinum MS is quote-based. Source (2026-08-28)
Published: free plan, then flat monthly plans by email volume from $19/mo Source (2026-08-30)
10 = hosts the records for you. 6 = partial or add-on. 3 = you manage your own DNS.
Managed service plans publish SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record management; SPF uses macro expansion to support many authorized senders. Source (2026-08-28)
10 = a genuine free plan. 6 = time-limited trial only. 3 = no free access.
Free plan: one domain, up to 1,000 emails/mo, 14-day report history, no credit card, plus a 15-day full-product trial Source (2026-08-30)
10 = a real MSP program with multi-tenant management. 6 = partial. 3 = none.
No public MSP, reseller, or channel programme is documented on the reviewed product and pricing pages. Source (2026-08-28)
How much work it takes to get a domain from p=none to p=reject. 10 = the platform (or the vendor's team) gets you there without manual DNS edits.
Managed SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records, dedicated account management, sender authorization, and recurring reviews place substantial policy work with the service. Source (2026-08-28)
The DMARC Agent detects when a domain's authentication and alignment are ready for the next policy stage and proposes the move, but a human still approves and applies it, so it is not fully hands-off. Source (2026-07-29)
Managed reviews vs agent-led remediation
SPF Macro Expansion and managed reviews versus an agent that carries remediation
spfXio's center of gravity is authentication-record management. Its public product pages describe SPF Macro Expansion for the SPF 10-lookup limit, SPF and DKIM management, DMARC policy management, report analysis, and actionable insights. The managed-service plans add an account manager and scheduled report reviews, so a team can bring a specialist relationship into a problem that otherwise lives with its DNS and email operators.
That is genuine parity on the evidence and control layer, but it leaves a different question: who turns the evidence into the next safe change? spfXio says its experts provide actionable insights and review artifacts; its public pages do not advertise an AI enforcement agent that identifies every sender, configures SPF and DKIM, and advances policy. Palisade's agent is designed to do that preparation and execution work, with the customer approving each step before anything ships. For a team that wants managed advice, spfXio is a coherent fit. For a team trying to reduce recurring operator work across many domains, the agentic model changes the workload.
- No agent advertised
- Policy management and reports
- Agent drafts and proposes
- Agent analyzes reports
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Domain caps vs portfolio pricing
What $299/month buys in Quartz MS, and how three-domain caps shape the decision
Quartz MS is the clearest public entry point: $299 per month for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record management, request allowances, 25,000 DMARC reported emails, 90 days of history, three domains, and three users. Diamond MS raises request and report allowances and history to 180 days for $499 per month, but still lists three domains and three users. Platinum MS is the path to customized limits and SSO, with no public price. The published structure is easy to understand for a small managed program, but the domain ceiling matters more than the request ceiling when a team has a broad portfolio.
Palisade uses a different commercial shape. IT teams choose a flat monthly sending-volume tier, with published rates from $19 per month, and paid tiers include a defined number of set-up domains while adding domains remains free and unlimited. MSPs use portfolio-based per-client-domain pricing without metering client email volume. That makes the two products answer different budget questions: spfXio asks you to select a managed-service allowance and possibly move to Platinum, while Palisade asks an IT team to size its own sending volume or an MSP to size the client portfolio.
What each side charges
Three points on each published range: the cheapest plan, one in the middle, and the top of what the vendor publishes. Every plan on both sides is in the pricing section further down.
- Quartz MS$299/month
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record management; up to 75,000 SPF requests, 50,000 DKIM requests, 25,000 DMARC reported emails; 90-day reporting history; up to 3 domains and 3 users; MFA, dedicated account manager, quarterly report review
- Diamond MS$499/month
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record management; up to 150,000 SPF requests, 100,000 DKIM requests, 50,000 DMARC reported emails; 180-day reporting history; up to 3 domains and 3 users; MFA, dedicated account manager, quarterly report review
- Platinum MSAsk sales
Customized SPF, DKIM, and DMARC limits, retention, domains, and users; SSO; dedicated account manager; monthly report review
- Free$0
1 domain, your own, capped at 1,000 emails/mo
- IT teams: up to 500,000 emails/mo$59/mo ($47/mo billed annually)
Same product: 6 set-up domains, pick the tier that matches your sending
- Enterprise (more than 2.5M / month)Custom
Custom volume, retention, and terms
- Ask sales above 3 domains
- Three protocol-specific caps
- No MSP model advertised
- Published tiers up to 20
- Monthly email volume
- Per client domain
Dedicated reviews vs PSA workflows
A dedicated-account-manager model for a few domains, with no public PSA path
spfXio's published plans are service-led. Quartz and Diamond include a dedicated account manager and quarterly report review; Platinum lists monthly report review. The public site also offers a Domain Inspector and a comparative analysis, which gives a prospective customer a way to inspect SPF and DMARC posture before committing. The free-trial page describes onboarding, expert guidance, evaluation of authentication performance, and advice on choosing a service level.
The public pages checked today do not advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA, Autotask, a ticketing connector, or a multi-tenant MSP console. That does not prove those capabilities cannot exist in a private engagement; it means they are not part of the public product evidence used here. An in-house team with up to three domains may value a named account manager and recurring review more than a PSA workflow. An MSP managing many client domains should ask for the exact tenant, import, delegation, and ticketing process before treating spfXio as a portfolio platform. Palisade's native PSA integrations and portfolio pricing are the more direct fit when those operational mechanics are requirements.
Native PSA integrations
Palisade imports client domains straight from these three. spfXio's own coverage is stated above, from their site.
- ConnectWise PSA
- Autotask
- HaloPSA
- Account manager and reviews
- No named PSA integrations
- Redundancy not advertised
- Agent analyzes reports
- Native PSA integrations
- Redundant managed DNS
SPF scale vs enforcement scope
The SPF problem spfXio emphasizes, and the broader enforcement job
spfXio has a specific technical point of view: SPF flattening is brittle, while macro expansion can keep a dynamic reference structure and support a virtually unlimited number of authorized third-party senders. That emphasis is useful when a domain has accumulated many SaaS senders and is approaching the ten-DNS-lookup limit. Its public material also connects authentication configuration with phishing, spoofing, and deliverability risk, rather than treating SPF as an isolated syntax exercise.
SPF scale is only one part of an enforcement program. A team still has to discover which senders are legitimate, establish DKIM continuity, resolve alignment failures, change DNS safely, watch the resulting reports, and move policy from monitoring to quarantine and reject. spfXio advertises tools, management, and expert insight for those areas. Palisade's distinction is that its agent is built to carry the investigation and fix-preparation loop across them, while the customer remains the approval gate. If SPF lookup pressure is the main issue and the organization wants a specialist service, spfXio's focus is relevant. If the main issue is the volume of recurring work, an agentic workflow is the narrower answer.
- Expands SPF references
- Included in every tier
- Included in every tier
- Hosted SPF flattening
- Agent drafts SPF fixes
- Agent drafts DKIM fixes
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Dashboard access vs programmatic access
spfXio's managed-service site lists no public API, MCP server, or AI feature
spfXio's public homepage, management-platform, pricing, tools, and free-trial pages describe managed authentication, report analysis, Domain Inspector, pricing tiers, and expert guidance. The navigation lists tools, educational resources, a blog, pricing, a free trial, contact, and sign-in. Those pages do not advertise a documented customer REST or GraphQL API, an MCP server, an AI-assistant integration, AI or machine-learning product features, scheduled exports, webhooks, or a data feed (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27) Source 4 (2026-08-27) Source 5 (2026-08-27)
Palisade publishes an MCP server and a REST API. The agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step. A human approves before anything ships.
Reachable from your own AI tools
Palisade's MCP server exposes 30 tools over OAuth, so the assistant your team already uses can read domains, pull the exact records to publish and work the task queue. These are the clients the connection guide walks through.
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Cursor
- Windsurf
- Any MCP client
- No MCP server listed
- No public API listed
- No AI features listed
- MCP server published
- REST API published
- Agent drafts and proposes
Still deciding between spfXio and Palisade? See what changes with Palisade.
1 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
Microsoft 365
Zoho Mail
The agent does the heavy lifting
Sources identified, SPF and DKIM fixes drafted, each policy step proposed. You approve; nothing ships on its own.
Connect your AI with MCP
30 tools over MCP, so your assistant reads your domains and works the queue.
Connect your DNS manager directly
Approved records go into your own zone at your own provider, across 64. No credentials reach us.
“We evaluated many DMARC providers before choosing Palisade. The quality of their product, the responsiveness and friendliness of their team and their rapid progress on their product roadmap made it a no-brainer for us to move forward.”
What $299/month buys in spfXio Quartz MS, and where the caps sit
spfXio publishes three managed-service paths. Quartz MS starts at $299/month, Diamond MS is $499/month, and Platinum MS is quote-based. The first two plans have explicit request, report, history, domain, and user limits; the enterprise-oriented tier moves those limits into a sales conversation.
What you'd actually pay
The same five buyer sizes on every comparison, so a shape carries from one page to the next.
1 domain, up to 1,000 emails a month
Quartz MS: up to 3 domains and 25,000 DMARC reported emails; no 1-domain or 1,000-email tier is published
2 set-up domains, up to 100K emails a month
Diamond MS: up to 3 domains and 50,000 DMARC reported emails; no 2-domain or 100,000-email tier is published
10 set-up domains, up to 1M emails a month
Platinum MS: customized domains and DMARC report limits
20 set-up domains, up to 2.5M emails a month
Platinum MS: customized domains and DMARC report limits
Client domains under management, any volume
No MSP plan or per-client-domain rate is published
Palisade’s figures are derived from its published tiers. spfXio figures read from their pricing page on 2026-08-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
How spfXio prices
- The public pricing page lists a free 30-day trial link, but does not publish a trial-to-paid conversion process or payment terms on the pricing page (checked 2026-08-26).
- Quartz MS and Diamond MS are capped at 3 domains and 3 users, despite the larger request and report allowances on Diamond MS (checked 2026-08-26).
- Platinum MS is the published route for customized request limits, retention, domain and user limits, and SSO; its price is not published (checked 2026-08-26).
- The public pricing page does not publish annual discounts, overage rates, or named PSA integrations (checked 2026-08-26).
How Palisade prices
- Palisade publishes a Free plan for one domain and up to 1,000 emails per month, plus flat monthly IT-team plans sized by sending volume from $19/month. Annual billing is 20% lower.
- Paid IT tiers include 2, 3, 6, 10, or 20 set-up domains by plan. Adding domains is free and unlimited; only domains you set up count against the tier.
- Palisade's MSP pricing is portfolio-based per client domain, with client email volume not metered. MSPs also receive a free NFR domain and native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrations.
- Palisade offers a 15-day full-product trial without a credit card. The Free plan keeps 14 days of report history, while paid plans have unlimited retention and API access is available on every plan.
spfXio pricing read from their public pricing page on 2026-08-26.Palisade pricing read from the public pricing page on 2026-08-26.Plans and prices may have changed since.
Try Palisade free on one domain, or start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
What each one covers, and where it stops
Published facts only, read from each vendor's own material. Neither column describes a hands-on trial, because we have not run one.
spfXio is a managed and SaaS email-authentication platform built around SPF Macro Expansion, SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record management, policy management, and report analysis. Its managed-service plans add a dedicated account manager and scheduled report reviews, so it suits teams that want a specialist relationship for authentication records and reporting.
Quartz MS starts at $299 per month and covers SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record management for up to three domains and three users, with 90 days of reporting history. Diamond MS is $499 per month and retains the same domain and user caps; Platinum MS moves customized limits, retention, domains, users, and SSO to sales.
Palisade is built around an agent that does the DMARC work rather than reporting on it. It identifies every sending source, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step when the evidence supports it.
The agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step, you approve before anything ships.
- Provides DMARC policy management and report analysis
- Expands SPF references to accommodate a virtually unlimited number of authorized senders
- Includes SPF and DKIM record management in every published tier
- Provides near-real-time global visibility into email fraud
- Provides real-time Domain Inspector checks for DMARC and SPF configuration errors
- The agent investigates senders and drafts the fix, so the work arrives prepared rather than as a list of findings
- Hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC on redundant managed DNS, so an approved change can be carried out rather than handed off
- Portfolio workflow for MSPs, with ConnectWise, HaloPSA and Autotask integrations and a free NFR domain
- An MCP server and a REST API, so the same data and workflow are reachable from the AI tools a team already uses
- Does not advertise an AI agent for sender investigation, SPF/DKIM fixes, and policy enforcement
- Does not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations
- Does not advertise hosted records on redundant managed DNS
- Does not advertise an MCP server or AI-assistant integration
- Does not advertise a documented customer REST or GraphQL API
- Every policy change waits for a human approval, by design: nothing ships on the agent's own authority
- MSP pricing is quoted per client domain rather than published as a rate card
- Plans are sized by monthly email volume, so a low-domain, high-volume sender lands on a higher tier than domain count alone suggests
- Starts at
- $299/month (Quartz MS)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Domain limit
- 3 domains in Quartz MS and Diamond MS
- Retention
- 90 days (Quartz MS); 180 days (Diamond MS)
- Starts at
- Free, then $19/mo
- Free tier
- 1 domain, up to 1,000 emails/month
- Trial
- 15 days, full product, no credit card
- MSP model
- Quoted per client domain, portfolio-based
“Palisade made it so easy for us to get our blue verified checkmark and achieve our BIMI compliance”
Sources and further reading
Source checks run through 2026-08-26; every entry keeps its individual check date.
- spfXio homepage and SPF Macro Expansion positioning
Checked 2026-08-26
- spfXio SPF, DKIM, and DMARC management platform
Checked 2026-08-26
- spfXio managed-service pricing and plan limits
Checked 2026-08-26
- spfXio tools: Domain Inspector and comparative analysis
Checked 2026-08-26
- spfXio free 30-day trial and hosted-service terms
Checked 2026-08-26
- spfXio DMARC explanation and policy workflow
Checked 2026-08-26
- spfXio SPF Macro Expansion article
Checked 2026-08-26
- Palisade pricing
Checked 2026-08-26
- Palisade DMARC Agent
Checked 2026-08-26
- spfXio homepage, AI and automation access check
Checked 2026-08-27
- spfXio management platform, AI and automation access check
Checked 2026-08-27
- spfXio pricing, API and data-access check
Checked 2026-08-27
- spfXio tools, MCP and AI-assistant access check
Checked 2026-08-27
- spfXio free trial, AI-feature and export-access check
Checked 2026-08-27
Palisade vs spfXio: FAQ
What is the main difference between spfXio and Palisade?
spfXio presents a managed and SaaS email-authentication service centered on SPF macro expansion, SPF/DKIM/DMARC record management, report analysis, and scheduled expert review. Palisade is agentic: its agent investigates senders, drafts authentication fixes, and proposes each policy step toward p=reject while your team approves before anything ships. The decision is whether you want managed guidance around the records or an agent to carry more of the recurring work.
What does spfXio's SPF Macro Expansion do?
spfXio says its SPF Macro Expansion approach addresses the SPF ten-lookup limit and supports a virtually unlimited number of authorized third-party senders. Its public blog contrasts that approach with static SPF flattening, which it describes as brittle when providers change their IP ranges. Confirm the exact record design and operational responsibilities during onboarding for your domains.
How much does spfXio cost?
spfXio's public managed-service pricing lists Quartz MS at $299/month and Diamond MS at $499/month. Both include SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record management, three domains, and three users, with different request, report, and history allowances. Platinum MS is listed as ask sales with customized limits, retention, domains, users, and SSO. The public page does not list annual discounts or overage rates.
Does spfXio offer a free trial?
Yes. spfXio advertises a free 30-day trial. Its trial page says onboarding includes expert guidance, an evaluation of email-authentication performance, and advice on selecting the right service plan. The public pages checked here do not specify the post-trial billing mechanics, so confirm those terms before starting.
Does spfXio have ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations?
The spfXio homepage, product page, pricing page, and tools navigation checked on 2026-08-26 do not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations. If PSA synchronization, ticket creation, or client-tenant management is important to your MSP workflow, ask spfXio to confirm the current private or partner options. Palisade documents native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrations for MSP accounts.
Can I run spfXio and Palisade at the same time during a switch?
Yes. DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so you can add Palisade while spfXio continues receiving reports during an overlap window. Keep DNS ownership and policy decisions coordinated, compare sender and alignment findings, and retire the old reporting path only after the new workflow is confirmed.
Switching from spfXio takes three steps
- 1
Batch-import your domains
Bring your client domains into Palisade in bulk, or let your ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integration sync them automatically.
- 2
Run both platforms in parallel
DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so Palisade and spfXio receive the same reports during the overlap window. Nothing breaks while you compare.
- 3
Cut DNS over on your schedule
Point records at Palisade's hosted infrastructure (redundant managed DNS), then retire the old setup when you're satisfied.
Our onboarding team handles the technical transition with you.
Competitor information on this page was last reviewed against public sources on 2026-08-26. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.