URIports alternative

URIports vs Palisade in 2026

How URIports and Palisade compare on operating model, pricing, and fit for IT teams and MSPs.

Our verdict: Pick Palisade if you want an AI agent to carry the work through enforcement, whether you manage one domain or thousands. Pick URIports if your team prefers a traditional, operator-led workflow.

Samuel ChenardSamuel Chenard · CEO & Co-Founder, PalisadeCompetitor info reviewed 2026-07-18

Free 15-day trial · No credit card · Your own domain free forever (NFR)

URIports
URIports DMARC Status Overview dashboard showing policy stat tiles (none/quarantine/reject counts, total mail volume, average DMARC…
Palisade
Palisade domains dashboard with email activity chart and DMARC compliance report

Trusted by leading brands worldwide

Partner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner LogoPartner Logo

AI-first, agent-first DMARC software

DMARC software that does the work

Palisade is the easiest way for IT teams to reach DMARC enforcement, from one domain to thousands. Its AI agent investigates sending sources, configures SPF and DKIM, and moves domains toward p=reject, with DNS integrations that do the setup for you. Traditional DMARC workflows organize reports and leave each change to an operator.

The decision

Which one is right for you?

Pick URIports if…

  • You prefer a more traditional URIports workflow with people involved in each enforcement step.
  • Your buying criteria center on vendor-specific enterprise requirements.
  • Pick URIports if you want web-platform signals (CSP violations, Network Error Logging, certificate expiry, DNS record changes) in the same dashboard as DMARC reports and your team handles all DNS edits itself.
  • Pick URIports if you monitor a small set of domains, 30 to 90 days of report history covers your workflow, and a low flat subscription matters more than executed enforcement.

Pick Palisade if…

  • You manage anywhere from one domain to thousands.
  • You want an AI agent to investigate issues, configure authentication, and move domains toward p=reject.
  • Teams already using Claude, OpenAI, or other AI tools can bring the same agent-led operating model to DMARC.

Free 15-day trial · No credit card · Your own domain free forever (NFR)

Feature comparison

Palisade vs URIports at a glance

FeatureURIportsPalisade
Enforcement
Autonomous enforcement executionURIports describes a monitoring workflow: users decide policy changes and add DNS records themselves; the platform organizes reports and alerts (checked 2026-07-18).
DMARC report monitoringURIports processes DMARC aggregate and failure reports, plus SMTP TLS-RPT.
Limits & metering
Unlimited email volumeURIports states email volume is unlimited but meters processed reports per month (10k to 10M by tier).
Unlimited report retentionURIports retention is 30 days on Pebble and Stone and 90 days on Mountain and Himalaya; no retention is published for Sand, and Enterprise offers custom retention periods (checked 2026-07-18).
API access on every planURIports' API is available on Stone ($33/mo) and above.
MSP operations
ConnectWise, HaloPSA & Autotask integrationsURIports does not advertise PSA integrations (checked 2026-07-18); it offers webhooks with Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Discord templates.
Published per-domain MSP pricingURIports prices by report quota and domain caps, with extra domains in packs of 10 for $12/mo.
Hosted records & DNS
Hosted DMARC & SPF recordsURIports hosts MTA-STS policies but does not advertise hosted DMARC or SPF records (checked 2026-07-18).
Hosted MTA-STSIncluded from Stone; available on Pebble as an optional $6/mo add-on bundled with DNS Monitor.
SPF flatteningURIports' own FAQ states it does not offer an SPF flattening service and recommends against the technique (checked 2026-07-18).

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Pricing

URIports pricing explained (and how Palisade compares)

URIports prices five tiers by monthly report volume and domain count, from Sand at a $1.25/mo minimum (10k reports, 3 domains) to Himalaya at $530/mo (10M reports, 400 domains), with a custom enterprise option. Annual billing lowers Pebble through Himalaya, and extra domains come in packs of 10 for $12/mo on Stone and above.

URIports planPublished priceWhat you get
Sand$1.25/mo minimum10k reports/mo, 3 domains; listed for personal and hobby use, retention period not published
Pebble$7/mo ($6/mo annual)100k reports/mo, 5 domains, 30-day retention, push notifications, custom block rules; optional DNS Monitor + Hosted MTA-STS add-on for $6/mo
Stone$33/mo ($30/mo annual)500k reports/mo, 25 domains (extra packs of 10 for $12/mo), 30-day retention, API access, team access, DNS Monitor, Hosted MTA-STS, Certificate Monitor
Mountain$133/mo ($120/mo annual)2.5M reports/mo, 100 domains (extra packs of 10 for $12/mo), 90-day retention, adds OpenID Connect (OIDC) SSO
Himalaya$530/mo ($480/mo annual)10M reports/mo, 400 domains (extra packs of 10 for $12/mo), 90-day retention, adds security specialist support
EnterpriseCustom - contact salesInvoice billing, flexible payment terms, quotations, dedicated onboarding, custom report quotas, adjustable retention and domain limits, product and security support
  • The metering unit is processed reports per month (10k to 10M depending on tier); the pricing page states email volume itself is unlimited.
  • Report retention is 30 days on Pebble and Stone and 90 days on Mountain and Himalaya; the pricing page does not state a retention period for Sand, and Enterprise offers adjustable retention periods.
  • Extra domains cost $12/mo per pack of 10 on Stone and above.
  • API access starts at the Stone tier ($33/mo); OIDC SSO starts at Mountain ($133/mo).
  • One-month free trial, no payment method required.
  • What happens when a report quota is exceeded is not specified on the pricing page (checked 2026-07-18).

URIports pricing read from their public pricing page on 2026-07-18. Plans and prices may have changed since.

How Palisade prices instead

  • Palisade publishes per-domain pricing ($9/domain/mo for domains 2-100, $7 to 1,000, $5 beyond, $2 off per tier on annual billing), so MSP cost tracks client count; URIports gates tiers by monthly report quota and domain caps (3, 5, 25, 100, 400).
  • Palisade includes unlimited report retention on every paid plan; URIports retains report data for 30 days on Pebble and Stone and 90 days on Mountain and Himalaya (no retention period is published for Sand).
  • Palisade includes API access on every plan, including Free; URIports' API starts at the Stone tier ($33/mo).
  • Palisade's agent executes enforcement, configuring SPF and DKIM and tightening policy to p=reject; URIports monitors and alerts while your team makes every DNS and policy change by hand.
Palisade planPublished priceWhat you get
Free$01 NFR domain for your own MSP, capped at 1,000 emails/mo
Domains 2–100$9/domain/moUnlimited email volume, unlimited retention, every core feature
Domains 100–1,000$7/domain/moSame product — the rate drops automatically as you scale
Domains 1,000+$5/domain/moSame product, best rate

Free 15-day trial · No credit card · Your own domain free forever (NFR)

Customers

MSPs that made the switch

We increased our meetings booked by 21% and slept better at night knowing our emails are now secured
Marc-André CampagnaCEO, gaiia (YC 2021)
Palisade allowed our team to deploy DMARC on our domains in minutes instead of hours and making sure our clients are compliant with cutting edge security recommendations from Microsoft.
Alvin KalliCSIO, MSP Corp

Read our reviews on G2 →

Monitoring and alerts vs executed enforcement

URIports collects DMARC aggregate and failure reports, plus SMTP TLS-RPT and browser security reports, and organizes them into a dashboard. Its DMARC page frames the product as decision support: it shows which sending sources are unknown, which fail SPF or DKIM alignment, and how much mail a stricter policy would affect. The user makes the enforcement call and edits DNS themselves; setup starts with manually adding a generated DNS record, then the platform watches and notifies via email, push, webhooks, or Telegram.

Palisade's agent executes the work instead of reporting on it. It identifies legitimate senders, configures SPF and DKIM, and progressively tightens policy to p=reject. For an MSP running dozens of client domains, that difference is operational: with URIports, every quarantine or reject step on every domain is a manual DNS change your team performs; with Palisade, enforcement is the product's job and your team reviews the outcome.

Report quotas and retention caps vs per-domain pricing

URIports meters processed reports per month: 10k on Sand up to 10M on Himalaya, with domain caps at each tier (3, 5, 25, 100, 400) and extra domains in packs of 10 for $12/mo on Stone and above. Retention is 30 days on Pebble and Stone and 90 days on Mountain and Himalaya; the pricing page does not publish a retention period for Sand. API access starts at Stone ($33/mo) and OIDC SSO at Mountain ($133/mo). The pricing page states email volume itself is unlimited.

Palisade meters one thing: domains. Pricing is published at $9/domain/mo for domains 2-100, $7 to 1,000, and $5 beyond, with $2 off every tier on annual billing, plus a Free plan for one NFR domain and a 15-day trial with no card. Email volume and report retention are unlimited on every paid plan, and the API ships on every plan including Free, so you never plan around a quota, a retention window, or a tier upgrade.

Where URIports fits and where MSP scale strains it

URIports serves teams that want DMARC monitoring alongside web-platform signals: CSP violations, Network Error Logging, certificate expiry, and DNS record changes in one place. Its FAQ addresses MSP use directly: group client domains with labels, invite clients as team members scoped to their own domains, and add domains in packs of 10 without changing tiers. That works when clients are few and someone in-house owns the DNS edits each enforcement step requires.

At MSP scale the model strains. Report quotas and domain caps force tier planning as clients are added, 30 or 90 days of retention limits look-back during a slow policy rollout, and every enforcement change across every client domain stays manual. URIports fits a team monitoring a handful of domains that wants web reporting signals in the same dashboard and is comfortable executing DMARC enforcement by hand.

Migration

Switching from URIports takes three steps

1

Batch-import your domains

Bring your client domains into Palisade in bulk, or let your ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integration sync them automatically.

2

Run both platforms in parallel

DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so Palisade and URIports receive the same reports during the overlap window. Nothing breaks while you compare.

3

Cut DNS over on your schedule

Point records at Palisade's hosted infrastructure (100% DNS uptime guarantee), then retire the old setup when you're satisfied.

Free 15-day trial · No credit card · Your own domain free forever (NFR)

Our onboarding team handles the technical transition with you.

Questions

Palisade vs URIports: FAQ

Palisade is AI-first and agent-first DMARC software. Its agent investigates sending sources, works through SPF and DKIM alignment, and moves domains toward p=reject while your team stays in control. When evaluating URIports, compare that operating model with the workflow in its current product documentation and decide how much work you want your team to carry.

Choose Palisade if you want an AI agent to carry routine DMARC work through enforcement, whether you manage one domain or thousands. It is also a natural fit for teams already using Claude, OpenAI, or other AI tools to get operational work done.

Choose URIports if its current integrations, procurement model, or operating workflow better match your requirements. A more operator-led platform can also fit a team that prefers to review reports and make each change itself.

Start with a small group of representative domains. Send aggregate reports to both platforms during the evaluation, verify every legitimate sending source, and compare the work required to reach a safe enforcement decision. Confirm current pricing, retention, integrations, and contract terms directly with both vendors before migrating the rest of your portfolio.

No responsible DMARC platform should promise the same enforcement timeline for every domain. Timing depends on the number of sending sources, access to DNS and third-party systems, and how quickly each legitimate stream can be aligned. Palisade's agent reduces routine investigation and configuration work while operators retain control over policy decisions.

See the difference on your own domains

Free 15-day trial · No credit card · Your own domain free forever (NFR)

Competitor information on this page was last reviewed against public sources on 2026-07-18. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.