DMARCLY comparison
DMARCLY vs Palisade in 2026
DMARCLY publishes a report-led platform with plan-specific domain, message, and history limits. Palisade publishes an AI-agent workflow that turns aggregate-report evidence into prioritized tickets. Compare workflow ownership and current terms before choosing.
Samuel Chenard · CEO & Co-Founder, PalisadeCompetitor info reviewed 2026-07-28
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
Grok
Palisade
Trusted by leading brands worldwide
Palisade vs DMARCLY at a glance
| Feature | DMARCLY | Palisade |
|---|---|---|
| Enforcement | ||
| Documented staged path from p=none to p=rejectBoth vendors publish a staged-enforcement statement; confirm the operational handoff for your account. Source (2026-07-28) Source 2 (2026-07-28) | ||
| Published DMARC report processingDMARCLY lists aggregate and forensic reports; Palisade lists DMARC report parsing and sender classification. Source (2026-07-28) Source 2 (2026-07-28) | ||
| Limits & metering | ||
| Published email-volume plan inputThe vendors publish different volume descriptions, so buyers should confirm what each platform measures. Source (2026-07-28) Source 2 (2026-07-28) | ||
| Published report-history termDMARCLY lists 2 months to 1 year by plan; Palisade states unlimited report history. Source (2026-07-28) Source 2 (2026-07-28) | ||
| MSP operations | ||
| Published user-access policyDMARCLY lists user allowances by plan; Palisade states unlimited users on every plan. Source (2026-07-28) Source 2 (2026-07-28) | ||
| Published API accessDMARCLY lists API access on Enterprise; Palisade states API access is available on every plan. Source (2026-07-28) Source 2 (2026-07-28) | ||
How enforcement actually happens
DMARCLY describes aggregate and forensic report processing, charts, email-vendor identification, and authentication checks in its public materials. Its pricing page also lists reports and alerts on every published plan. Those capabilities make it a report-led option for teams that want a published set of plan limits to evaluate. Source (2026-07-28) Source 2 (2026-07-28)
DMARCLY documents a three-phase progression: monitor at p=none, move to p=quarantine, then to p=reject. Its public workflow says users analyze the data and modify mail streams as appropriate. Palisade's documented DMARC Agent analyzes aggregate-report data and creates prioritized detection and remediation tickets. In both cases, ask who reviews the evidence and who authorizes DNS or policy changes. Source (2026-07-28) Source 2 (2026-07-28)
What DMARCLY meters (and how Palisade prices)
DMARCLY's public plans combine a domain allowance, a monthly DMARC-compliant-message allowance, and a data-history window. The listed ranges are 2 to 200 domains, 100,000 to 5,000,000 messages per month, and 2 months to 1 year of history. Its FAQ also describes how domain, Safe SPF, and high-volume message charges apply. Source (2026-07-28)
Palisade publishes a free plan and paid plans sized by email volume. The sensible comparison is a current portfolio: count domains, estimate the mail volume that the relevant platform measures, identify how much history you need, and then obtain written terms for anything not on a public pricing page. Source (2026-07-28)
Who DMARCLY fits, and where it stops
DMARCLY is worth shortlisting when its public plan limits match a small, predictable domain portfolio and the team wants report processing, authentication checks, and a staged policy workflow in the same product. Safe SPF appears on its Growth tier and above, which may matter where SPF lookups are already a constraint. Source (2026-07-28)
Palisade is worth shortlisting when the buyer wants a ticket-driven DMARC workflow and its public pricing and product boundaries fit the portfolio. For an MSP or larger IT team, compare the evidence-review workflow, domain and volume limits, retention, integrations, and commercial terms in writing. Missing public information is a question for the sales process, not a feature gap. Source (2026-07-28) Source 2 (2026-07-28)
DMARCLY pricing explained (and how Palisade compares)
DMARCLY publishes four monthly tiers from $17.99 to $199. Each tier has a domain allowance, a monthly DMARC-compliant-message allowance, and a data-history window. Compare those published limits with your current volume and portfolio before treating either price as a like-for-like total.
| DMARCLY plan | Published price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Professional | $17.99/mo | 2 domains, 100,000 DMARC-compliant messages/mo, 2 months data history, 1 user, aggregate + forensic reports, BIMI, MTA-STS/TLS-RPT checks |
| Growth | $39.99/mo | 8 domains, 1 Safe SPF domain, 250,000 messages/mo, 4 months data history, 3 users, live chat support |
| Business | $69/mo | 15 domains, 2 Safe SPF domains, 1,000,000 messages/mo, 6 months data history, 5 users, domain blacklist monitoring |
| Enterprise | $199/mo | 200 domains, 4 Safe SPF domains, 5,000,000 messages/mo, 12 months data history, unlimited users, user access control, API, SSO/SAML |
- DMARCLY says all plans include a 14-day free trial (checked 2026-07-28).
- Plans meter monthly "DMARC compliant messages": 100K, 250K, 1M, or 5M by tier.
- DMARCLY's pricing FAQ lists $1 per additional DMARC domain, $10 per additional Safe SPF domain, and $10 per million messages above the 5M Enterprise allowance (checked 2026-07-28).
- Data history is capped by tier at 2, 4, 6, or 12 months.
- API access and SSO/SAML are listed only on the Enterprise plan.
- This comparison does not infer enterprise, partner, or annual terms from the public plan list. Ask both vendors about any terms that are material to your purchase.
DMARCLY pricing read from their public pricing page on 2026-07-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
How Palisade prices instead
- Palisade's public pricing page lists a free plan and paid plans sized by monthly email volume. Confirm the plan and volume that apply to your organization before comparing an invoice.
- Palisade says the same AI agent, unlimited users, and unlimited report history are available on every plan. Confirm any integration, retention, or support requirement with Palisade before selecting a tier.
- DMARCLY publishes domain, message, data-history, Safe SPF, and user limits for its plans. That makes those allowances useful comparison criteria when your portfolio has predictable limits.
| Palisade plan | Published price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1 domain — your own — capped at 1,000 emails/mo |
| IT teams — up to 100,000 emails/mo | $19/mo ($15/mo billed annually) | All your organization's domains, unlimited retention, every core feature |
| IT teams — up to 250,000 emails/mo | $29/mo ($23/mo billed annually) | Same product — pick the tier that matches your sending |
| IT teams — up to 500,000 emails/mo | $59/mo ($47/mo billed annually) | Same product — pick the tier that matches your sending |
| IT teams — up to 1,000,000 emails/mo | $99/mo ($79/mo billed annually) | Same product — pick the tier that matches your sending |
| MSP | Quoted per client domain — portfolio-based | No client email metering, free NFR domain, 15-day trial, multi-tenant + PSA integrations |
| Enterprise (1M+ emails/mo) | Custom | Custom volume, retention, and terms |
Palisade pricing read from the public pricing page on 2026-07-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
Which one is right for you?
Pick DMARCLY if…
- Its published domain, message, data-history, and Safe SPF limits fit your current portfolio.
- You want its report-processing, alerting, and staged DMARC policy workflow.
- You have confirmed any required API, integration, retention, or support detail with DMARCLY.
Pick Palisade if…
- You want the DMARC Agent to turn aggregate-report evidence into prioritized detection and remediation tickets.
- You have confirmed that Palisade's current plan and operational model fit your domain portfolio.
- You want to review the evidence and approve the DNS or policy changes that remain under your control.
Our verdict: Choose DMARCLY when its published limits and report-led workflow fit your portfolio. Choose Palisade when its AI-agent workflow and current commercial terms fit the work your team wants to keep in-house. Verify the operational handoff and final price with both vendors.
Check the evidence behind your shortlist
A pricing page and public product description are useful starting points, but they do not prove that either workflow fits your domains. Inspect the published DMARC record before making a buying decision.
Check a published DMARC record
A public-record check cannot show the full provider workflow, prove message-level alignment, or replace a review of delivered-mail evidence.
Switching from DMARCLY takes three steps
Inventory domains and reports
List the domains, reporting addresses, plan limits, and any DNS or authentication dependencies before changing a provider.
Compare the operating workflow
Use the same domain evidence to confirm how each product surfaces issues, who reviews the findings, and which changes still need approval.
Move after validation
Plan the record and reporting-address changes with the responsible DNS owner, then validate the published record and delivered-mail results before retiring the prior workflow.
Sources and further reading
Primary product and pricing pages reviewed on 2026-07-28.
- DMARCLY product overview
Checked 2026-07-28
- DMARCLY pricing and plan limits
Checked 2026-07-28
- Palisade pricing and plan details
Checked 2026-07-28
- Palisade DMARC Agent
Checked 2026-07-28