The email deliverability platform that names the sender putting you in spam
Palisade reads your DMARC reports and names the sending service that is failing authentication. See every ESP, CRM, and billing tool that sends as your domain, with the fix already drafted.
What Email Deliverability Platform helps you accomplish
Every sender, one view
DMARC reports reveal everything that sends as your domain: the ESP you know about, the CRM someone connected last year, the billing tool nobody mentioned. Palisade identifies them all from real report traffic.
Failures surface before spam does
The activity chart splits your volume into compliant, failed, unknown, and forwarded. A platform that starts failing SPF or DKIM shows up as a trend you can see, and a ticket with the fix drafted.
Authentication requirements, covered
Google and Microsoft include authentication requirements for bulk senders. Palisade covers the SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and alignment portion; their broader programs include other deliverability and message-handling requirements.
Trusted by leading brands worldwide
From spam-folder mystery to a named fix
Deliverability problems stop being guesswork when every sender's authentication is on one chart.
Reports come in
Palisade collects DMARC aggregate reports for your domains. The receivers' own record of what arrived and whether it authenticated.
Activity is charted
Volume is split into compliant, failed, unknown, and forwarded, per domain and over time, so the shape of the problem is visible at a glance.
The failing sender is named
Failures trace back to the platform producing them. The Agent opens a ticket naming the sender, the SPF or DKIM issue, and the drafted fix.
Watch the trend recover
Approve and deploy the fix, then watch failed volume fall and compliant volume rise on the same chart that caught the problem.
What the deliverability view gives you
Email activity chart
Compliant, failed, unknown, and forwarded volume over time, per domain: the trend line that shows a problem starting, and ending.
Per-sender compliance
Every sending source with its SPF, DKIM, and alignment status, so "deliverability is down" becomes "this platform is failing DKIM".
Unknown-sender detection
Volume that no confirmed sender accounts for stands out on its own line: shadow tools and spoofing attempts, not just misconfigurations.
Fixes drafted by the Agent
Authentication failures become prioritized tickets with the recommended change attached. Review, approve, and deploy: with Hosted DNS, straight from Palisade.
Unlimited report history on paid plans
Keep the complete DMARC report history on paid plans with no expiry. The Free plan keeps 14 days of history.
Free checks to start
Run the email security score or the deliverability test on any domain before you sign up: the same authentication checks, one domain at a time.
Deliverability work with a business result.See how gaiia stopped landing in spam.
5.0 out of 5 on G2Trusted by over 10,000 domains
Deliverability
21% more meetings booked.How gaiia stopped landing in spam.
“We increased our meetings booked by 21% and slept better at night knowing our emails are now secured”
Marc-André Campagna, CEO, gaiia
Email Deliverability Platform: FAQ
How does DMARC data help deliverability?
DMARC aggregate reports are the receivers' own record of your mail: who sent it, how much, and whether it passed SPF and DKIM. That makes them the ground truth for deliverability work: instead of guessing why campaigns land in spam, you see which sending platform is failing authentication and fix that.
What counts as compliant, failed, unknown, and forwarded?
Compliant mail passed DMARC: it authenticated and aligned with your domain. Failed mail came from a source that didn't authenticate correctly. Unknown volume traces to no confirmed sender, which can mean a shadow tool or spoofing. Forwarded mail passed through an intermediary that often breaks SPF on the way: expected, and tracked separately so it doesn't read as an attack.
Will this satisfy Google and Microsoft's bulk-sender rules?
Palisade covers the authentication portion of their bulk-sender rules: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and alignment. The compliance view shows where each domain stands and the Agent drafts the fixes. Google and Microsoft also impose other deliverability and message-handling requirements outside this authentication view.
Is this a one-off inbox-placement test?
No: placement here is continuous, drawn from real traffic. A seed test sends one message and checks where that message lands; Palisade reads what receivers report about every message, so you see placement by provider alongside which real sender is failing and when it started. The free Email Spam Checker covers the one-shot check.
Can it catch a problem before recipients notice?
That's the point of the trend view. A platform that starts failing DKIM shows up in report data as failed volume and as a ticket while the damage is still building, so the fix can ship before the spam-folder complaints arrive.
Which senders does it recognize?
Sending sources are detected from real report traffic, whatever they are: ESPs, CRMs, helpdesks, billing systems, marketing automation. You confirm the legitimate ones, and anything new that appears later opens a ticket for review.
Find the sender costing you the inbox
1 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month