Report-URI alternative
Report-URI vs Palisade in 2026
Report-URI combines DMARC aggregate reporting with a wider client-side security platform. Palisade is agentic: its AI agent investigates senders, drafts authentication fixes, and proposes each policy step for your approval.
Our verdict: Pick Report-URI if you want DMARC visibility alongside CSP, browser, and client-side security telemetry. Pick Palisade if the job is to carry email authentication from investigation through an approved path to p=reject across the domains you operate.
Samuel Chenard · CEO & Co-Founder, PalisadeSource checks through 2026-08-261 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
Grok
Palisade
Palisade is free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Which one is right for you?
Best for Teams wanting client-side security telemetry
Best for MSPs and IT teams responsible for multiple domains
- You prefer a more traditional Report-URI workflow with people involved in each enforcement step.
- Your buying criteria center on vendor-specific enterprise requirements.
- Report-URI fits when you want DMARC visibility alongside CSP, browser, and client-side security telemetry.
- Report-URI fits when you want a report-and-review workflow that starts at p=none and leaves policy changes to your team.
- You run an MSP, or an internal IT or security team, responsible for multiple domains.
- You want an AI agent to investigate issues, configure authentication, and move domains toward p=reject.
- Teams already using Claude, OpenAI, or other AI tools can bring the same agent-led operating model to DMARC.
Free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Where the day-to-day work actually differs
| Feature | Report-URI | Palisade |
|---|---|---|
| Enforcement | ||
| AI agent that investigates senders, drafts fixes, and proposes each policy stepWhether the service prepares policy changes for approval.Report-URI's DMARC guidance tells the customer to review reports and tighten p=none to quarantine and then reject; its public DMARC and integrations pages do not advertise an agent executing that enforcement workflow (checked 2026-08-26) Source (2026-08-26) | No agent advertised | Agent drafts and proposes |
| DMARC aggregate report monitoring and analyticsWhether the service turns aggregate reports into sender data.Report-URI accepts aggregate rua reports, enriches the data, and surfaces source, volume, SPF, DKIM, alignment, and disposition information Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Enriched aggregate reports | Agent analyzes reports |
| Forensic failure report (ruf) processingWhether the service processes message-specific failure reports.Report-URI states that it supports only aggregate feedback reports and does not plan to implement ruf message-specific failure reports (checked 2026-08-26) Source (2026-08-26) | Aggregate reports only | Aggregate reports only |
| Limits & metering | ||
| Unlimited report retentionHow long the service keeps report history.Report-URI publishes 15, 30, 60, and 90-day data-retention periods for Starter, Professional, Business, and Ultimate; Enterprise retention is flexible rather than universally unlimited (checked 2026-08-26) Source (2026-08-26) | No unlimited retention | Unlimited on paid plans |
| MSP operations | ||
| API access on every planWhether API access is available on every plan.Report-URI's pricing matrix marks API access for Business and Ultimate, not Starter or Professional; its REST API documentation describes read-only account-data access (checked 2026-08-26) Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Not every plan | Every plan, including Free |
| Team accounts with roles and scoped report dataWhether team members can have roles and restricted report access.Report-URI documents User, Admin, and Owner roles, team-specific reporting addresses, quota allocation, and teams whose members see the relevant team data Source (2026-08-26) | Roles and data scopes | Unlimited users, every plan |
| Native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrationsWhether the service connects directly to common PSA tools.Report-URI's public integrations page advertises API, MCP, AI-agent connections, and webhooks, but does not advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations (checked 2026-08-26) Source (2026-08-26) | Not advertised | Native PSA integrations |
| Read-only REST API for reports and account dataWhether teams can retrieve reports and account data through an API.Report-URI documents an OpenAPI-backed REST API with report, quota, plan, team, graph, and account endpoints; the API accepts GET requests only Source (2026-08-26) | Read-only GET API | Available on every plan |
| Webhooks and chat/SIEM destinations for operational alertsWhether alerts can reach chat or SIEM tools.Report-URI documents Watch alerts for Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat, and Mattermost, plus audit-trail webhooks for SIEM or log platforms Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Chat and SIEM alerts | Not advertised |
| Hosted records & DNS | ||
| Hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM recordsWhether the service hosts email-authentication DNS records.Report-URI describes a customer-published DMARC TXT record and says the service does not sit in the mail path; its public DMARC pages do not advertise hosted SPF, DKIM, or DMARC records (checked 2026-08-26) Source (2026-08-26) | Not advertised | Hosted on managed DNS |
| SPF flatteningWhether SPF includes are flattened into one lookup.Report-URI's DMARC product and setup documentation require SPF and DKIM to be in place but do not advertise an SPF-flattening service (checked 2026-08-26) Source (2026-08-26) | Not advertised | One lookup record |
| Commercial terms | ||
| Self-service free trialWhether someone can start a trial without sales involvement.Report-URI's pricing page says all self-service plans include a free trial; its DMARC page currently presents a 30-day free-trial call to action Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | All plans include trial | No-card trial access |
| AI and automation access | ||
| Read-only REST API for account dataWhether scripts can retrieve product data through documented endpoints.Report-URI publishes an OpenAPI-backed REST API for reports, Watch findings, CSP policies, and account configuration; all endpoints accept GET requests only. Its documentation says the trial includes API access and keeping it needs a Business plan or higher (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | Read-only REST API | REST API published |
| MCP server for connecting AI assistants to account dataWhether an AI assistant can reach the product's account data directly.Report-URI publishes an MCP endpoint that lets AI assistants query account data, including reports, Watch findings, and quota usage. Its documentation says the trial includes the endpoint and keeping integration access needs a Business plan or higher (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | Hosted MCP server | MCP server published |
| AI-agent workflow for security-reporting setupWhether the vendor publishes an assistant workflow that uses product data.Report-URI publishes an AI-agent prompt that reads per-account setup values from its MCP server and directs the agent to add a report-only CSP header. The vendor says its MCP tools are read-only and cannot create or select a CSP policy (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | MCP setup prompt | Agent drafts fixes |
| Programmatic access beyond the dashboardWhether data or alerts can reach software without manual dashboard work.Report-URI documents JSON REST API responses and webhooks that send Watch alerts as HTTP POST requests. Its API and webhook documentation say those features need a Business plan or higher after the trial (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | API and webhooks | REST API published |
Want to compare the workflow yourself? Try Palisade free with one domain and up to 1,000 emails a month.
Palisade 96 vs Report-URI 48, and why
Both products are scored on the same eight dimensions the comparison hub uses, so the figures here are the figures there. Four are derived from vendor facts that each carry a source and a checked date. Four are editorial, marked as such below, and each states its reasoning and its source.
Each dimension is out of 10 and the total is the raw sum out of 80, rescaled to 100 — the raw figure is printed beside it so the conversion is checkable rather than a black box. Scored on what each vendor publishes, not on how the product feels in use. Editorial dimensions last reviewed 2026-08-30.
How reachable the product is from your own software and AI tools. 10 = a documented API on every plan plus a published MCP server. 6 = an API, gated to a tier or to a sales conversation. 3 = no programmatic access advertised.
Report URI publishes an API and an MCP server, but both require a Business plan or higher after the trial. Source (2026-08-28)
Palisade publishes a REST API and a remote MCP server on every plan, making the same domain data and remediation workflows available to connected software. Source (2026-08-30)
How much of the report analysis is done for you. 10 = the platform turns raw report data into a prioritised, actionable queue on its own.
Report enrichment, filtering, quotas, dashboards, API, MCP tools, audit logs, and exports automate ingestion and access across report types. Source (2026-08-28)
Report data is analysed into a prioritised list of sender, SPF, DKIM and DMARC issues, so nobody reads raw XML. Source (2026-07-29)
How much of the work the vendor's own software does. 10 = it identifies the sending sources, drafts the SPF and DKIM fixes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step. 6 = it applies the records for you, but a person decides what to fix and when to advance. 3 = it reports, and every change is yours to make. A vendor whose team does the work rather than its software scores here on the software alone.
The platform names and enriches DMARC sending sources, but customers change their DNS records and decide when to advance the policy. Source (2026-08-28)
The agent investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes it needs, and proposes the next policy step; a human approves before deployment. Source (2026-08-30)
10 = full pricing published. 6 = some tiers published, rest quote-gated. 3 = quote only.
Starter is $54.99, Professional $109.99, Business $164.99, and Ultimate $274.99 per month; Enterprise is custom. Source (2026-08-28)
Published: free plan, then flat monthly plans by email volume from $19/mo Source (2026-08-30)
10 = hosts the records for you. 6 = partial or add-on. 3 = you manage your own DNS.
No: the service supplies report destinations and configuration guidance but does not host DMARC, SPF, DKIM, or BIMI policy records. Source (2026-08-28)
10 = a genuine free plan. 6 = time-limited trial only. 3 = no free access.
No ongoing free plan is listed; self-service plans include a thirty-day free trial. Source (2026-08-28)
Free plan: one domain, up to 1,000 emails/mo, 14-day report history, no credit card, plus a 15-day full-product trial Source (2026-08-30)
10 = a real MSP program with multi-tenant management. 6 = partial. 3 = none.
No public MSP or reseller programme is documented; Team accounts and Enterprise packaging support organizations but not published client tenancy. Source (2026-08-28)
How much work it takes to get a domain from p=none to p=reject. 10 = the platform (or the vendor's team) gets you there without manual DNS edits.
Official guidance describes safe DMARC policy progression, while record hosting, DNS writes, and managed remediation are outside the published product. Source (2026-08-28)
The DMARC Agent detects when a domain's authentication and alignment are ready for the next policy stage and proposes the move, but a human still approves and applies it, so it is not fully hands-off. Source (2026-07-29)
Report visibility vs enforcement execution
Report visibility versus enforcement execution
Report-URI's DMARC product is built around visibility. It accepts aggregate reports, enriches the raw XML with additional data, and presents the questions an operator needs to answer: which sources sent as the domain, how much mail they sent, whether SPF and DKIM passed, whether the authenticated domain aligned, and what disposition the receiver applied. The product page also makes its boundary explicit: Report-URI does not receive message content and accepts rua, not ruf, reports. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
That makes Report-URI a reasonable fit for a team that wants a clear report surface and is prepared to own the policy work. Palisade changes the unit of work. Its agent investigates every sender, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each move toward p=reject, with a customer approval before anything ships. A dashboard tells an operator what deserves attention; Palisade is designed to prepare the next action and keep the operator at the approval point.
- No agent advertised
- Enriched aggregate reports
- Aggregate reports only
- Agent drafts and proposes
- Agent analyzes reports
- Aggregate reports only
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Reporting insight vs DNS execution
The boundary between a report and a DNS change
Report-URI's setup is intentionally light. Its documentation says SPF and DKIM should already be configured, then shows one DMARC TXT record containing the customer's unique rua address. The product page says there is no code to add, no change to mail flow, and no message routing through Report-URI. The starting state is p=none, which observes without changing delivery; the customer moves to quarantine and reject when the reports show that legitimate mail authenticates cleanly. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
Palisade keeps that approval boundary while reducing the handwork around it. The agent can configure and draft the SPF and DKIM changes, identify the sending sources that need attention, and propose the policy sequence. Smart DNS Deployment can write the records you approve into your own zone through a connection you authorise with your DNS provider. The practical comparison is not whether either platform understands DMARC; both do. It is whether your team wants to turn the report into each DNS task itself or review a prepared, provider-specific change.
- Not advertised
- Not advertised
- Hosted on managed DNS
- One lookup record
Quota limits vs plan access
Quota, retention, and plan gates
Report-URI's pricing is not a simple per-domain DMARC ladder. Starter protects one domain and carries 100,000 monthly events with 15 days of retention; Professional moves to two domains, 250,000 events, and 30 days; Business lists three domains, 750,000 events, and 60 days; Ultimate lists five domains, 2 million events, and 90 days. The page defines events as website telemetry items, so an email-heavy team should confirm how its DMARC activity maps to the broader platform limits before using the figures as a budget model. Source (2026-08-26)
The feature gates matter as much as the headline price. The public matrix marks team access at Professional and above, API access at Business and Ultimate, and webhooks at Business and Ultimate. Enterprise adds custom scale, dedicated infrastructure, geographic hosting, SLA-backed support, onboarding, and procurement flexibility. Palisade's published model is easier to read for this specific job: a free one-domain entry point, flat IT-team plans sized by email volume, API access on every plan, and portfolio-based per-client-domain pricing for MSPs. Source (2026-08-26)
What each side charges
Three points on each published range: the cheapest plan, one in the middle, and the top of what the vendor publishes. Every plan on both sides is in the pricing section further down.
- Starter$54.99/mo ($659.88 billed yearly)
1 protected domain, 100K monthly events, 15-day retention, basic alerting, hosted SaaS platform, and standard support
- Business$164.99/mo ($1,979.88 billed yearly)
3 protected domains, 750K monthly events, 60-day retention, advanced alerting, team access, integrations, and email support
- EnterpriseCustom - contact sales
Custom domains, event volumes, and retention, with dedicated infrastructure and geographic-hosting options, SLA-backed support, onboarding, and flexible procurement
- Free$0
1 domain, your own, capped at 1,000 emails/mo
- IT teams: up to 500,000 emails/mo$59/mo ($47/mo billed annually)
Same product: 6 set-up domains, pick the tier that matches your sending
- Enterprise (more than 2.5M / month)Custom
Custom volume, retention, and terms
- No unlimited retention
- Unlimited on paid plans
Security breadth vs MSP workflow
Teams, integrations, and MSP fit
Report-URI has more operational integration surface than a DMARC-only description suggests. Its docs cover a read-only REST API, MCP, AI-agent connections, and webhooks. Watch alerts can go to Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat, and Mattermost, while the audit trail can feed a SIEM or log platform. Its team documentation describes User, Admin, and Owner roles, team-specific reporting addresses, quota allocation, and separate views of team data. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26)
That breadth fits a security team that wants email telemetry beside browser and client-side security signals. It is not the same as an MSP operating model. Report-URI's public integrations pages do not advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask, and its team docs describe teams and report ownership rather than a client-domain service workflow. Palisade is aimed at the repeatable MSP loop: client domains, PSA-connected work, agent-prepared fixes, and per-client-domain economics. Choose Report-URI when the wider security platform is the requirement; choose Palisade when authenticated email operations across a portfolio are the requirement. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
Native PSA integrations
Palisade imports client domains straight from these three. Report-URI's own coverage is stated above, from their site.
- ConnectWise PSA
- Autotask
- HaloPSA
- Not every plan
- Roles and data scopes
- Not advertised
- Every plan, including Free
- Unlimited users, every plan
- Native PSA integrations
Dashboard access vs programmatic access
Report-URI's hosted MCP endpoint and read-only REST API
Report-URI publishes an OpenAPI-backed REST API for read-only access to reports, Watch findings, CSP policies, and account configuration. It also publishes a hosted MCP endpoint that lets AI assistants query account data, including reports, Watch findings, and quota usage. The vendor says its 30-day trial includes API and MCP access, with a Business plan or higher required afterwards. Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27)
Report-URI also publishes an agent prompt that retrieves per-account setup values and adds a report-only CSP header to a site. Its MCP tools are read-only, so they cannot create policies or change account settings. Palisade publishes an MCP server at /mcp. Its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step. A human approves before anything ships. Source (2026-08-27)
Reachable from your own AI tools
Palisade's MCP server exposes 30 tools over OAuth, so the assistant your team already uses can read domains, pull the exact records to publish and work the task queue. These are the clients the connection guide walks through.
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Cursor
- Windsurf
- Any MCP client
- Read-only REST API
- Hosted MCP server
- MCP setup prompt
- REST API published
- MCP server published
- Agent drafts fixes
Still deciding between Report-URI and Palisade? See what changes with Palisade.
1 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
Microsoft 365
Zoho Mail
The agent does the heavy lifting
Sources identified, SPF and DKIM fixes drafted, each policy step proposed. You approve; nothing ships on its own.
Connect your AI with MCP
30 tools over MCP, so your assistant reads your domains and works the queue.
Connect your DNS manager directly
Approved records go into your own zone at your own provider, across 64. No credentials reach us.
“We evaluated many DMARC providers before choosing Palisade. The quality of their product, the responsiveness and friendliness of their team and their rapid progress on their product roadmap made it a no-brainer for us to move forward.”
Report-URI pricing explained (and how Palisade compares)
Report-URI publishes pricing for its wider client-side security platform, which includes DMARC monitoring as one email-security feature alongside CSP, browser, integrity, threat-intelligence, and PCI DSS capabilities. The public rate card is organized by protected domains, monthly events, retention, team access, integrations, and support; it does not present a separate DMARC-only rate card.
What you'd actually pay
The same five buyer sizes on every comparison, so a shape carries from one page to the next.
1 domain, up to 1,000 emails a month
Starter: 1 protected domain and 100K monthly events; no 1,000-email allowance is published
2 set-up domains, up to 100K emails a month
Professional: 2 protected domains and 250K monthly events; no 100K-email allowance is published
10 set-up domains, up to 1M emails a month
Ultimate: 5 protected domains and 2M monthly events; no 10-domain or 1M-email tier is published
20 set-up domains, up to 2.5M emails a month
Enterprise: custom domains, event volumes, and retention; no price is published for 20 domains and 2.5M emails
Client domains under management, any volume
No MSP plan or per-client-domain rate is published
Palisade’s figures are derived from its published tiers. Report-URI figures read from their pricing page on 2026-08-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
How Report-URI prices
- The pricing page defines events as telemetry items sent by websites, including CSP violations and related browser signals. That unit is broader than DMARC email volume, so it should not be treated as a DMARC-only quota.
- Report-URI says customers can upgrade when they exceed plan limits. Its FAQ says that when a report quota is exceeded, it stops processing reports until the following month or an upgrade; the current pricing page describes the same situation more briefly as an upgrade or plan-fit conversation.
- Data retention is 15 days on Starter, 30 on Professional, 60 on Business, and 90 on Ultimate. Enterprise publishes flexible retention rather than a fixed public number.
- The public page says all self-service plans include a free trial. The DMARC product page currently labels that CTA as a 30-day free trial; the pricing table does not repeat the duration.
- DMARC-specific entitlements are not broken out by plan on the public pricing matrix, so the rate card is best read as platform pricing rather than a precise DMARC-only feature map.
How Palisade prices
- Palisade publishes a Free plan for one domain and up to 1,000 emails per month, then flat monthly IT-team plans sized by email volume from $19/month with 20% off on annual billing.
- Palisade's agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step; you approve before anything ships. That is the operating difference to evaluate against Report-URI's report-and-review workflow.
- Palisade includes API access on every plan, including Free. MSPs pay per client domain, with a rate that improves as the portfolio grows, and their own MSP domain is included as a free Not-For-Resale license.
- Palisade's hosted records are served on redundant managed DNS, while Smart DNS Deployment writes approved records into the customer's own DNS zone through a scoped, revocable connection.
Report-URI pricing read from their public pricing page on 2026-08-26.Plans and prices may have changed since.
Try Palisade free on one domain, or start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
What each one covers, and where it stops
Published facts only, read from each vendor's own material. Neither column describes a hands-on trial, because we have not run one.
Report-URI combines DMARC aggregate reporting with a broader client-side security platform. Its DMARC view enriches aggregate XML and shows sending sources, volume, SPF and DKIM results, alignment, and disposition. The platform also publishes browser, integrity, threat-intelligence, and PCI DSS capabilities, so its public rate card covers more than DMARC.
Report-URI uses a light DMARC setup for teams prepared to publish a DMARC TXT record, review aggregate reports, and move from p=none to quarantine and reject. It also publishes team roles and scoped data, a read-only API, MCP access, webhooks, and chat or SIEM alert destinations.
Palisade is built around an agent that does the DMARC work rather than reporting on it. It identifies every sending source, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step when the evidence supports it.
The agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step, you approve before anything ships.
- Provides enriched aggregate DMARC reporting with source, volume, SPF, DKIM, alignment, and disposition data
- Provides team roles, scoped report data, reporting addresses, and quota allocation
- Provides a read-only GET API for reports and account data
- Provides chat alerts and SIEM or log-platform webhooks
- Provides a hosted MCP server for AI assistants to query account data
- The agent investigates senders and drafts the fix, so the work arrives prepared rather than as a list of findings
- Hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC on redundant managed DNS, so an approved change can be carried out rather than handed off
- Portfolio workflow for MSPs, with ConnectWise, HaloPSA and Autotask integrations and a free NFR domain
- An MCP server and a REST API, so the same data and workflow are reachable from the AI tools a team already uses
- Does not advertise an agent that investigates senders, drafts fixes, and proposes policy steps
- Does not advertise forensic failure report (ruf) processing
- Does not advertise unlimited report retention
- Does not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations
- Does not advertise hosted DMARC, SPF, or DKIM records
- Every policy change waits for a human approval, by design: nothing ships on the agent's own authority
- MSP pricing is quoted per client domain rather than published as a rate card
- Plans are sized by monthly email volume, so a low-domain, high-volume sender lands on a higher tier than domain count alone suggests
- Starts at
- $54.99/mo ($659.88 billed yearly)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Retention
- 15 to 90 days
- Published domains
- 1 to 5 protected domains
- Enterprise price
- Custom; contact sales
- Starts at
- Free, then $19/mo
- Free tier
- 1 domain, up to 1,000 emails/month
- Trial
- 15 days, full product, no credit card
- MSP model
- Quoted per client domain, portfolio-based
“Palisade made it so easy for us to get our blue verified checkmark and achieve our BIMI compliance”
Sources and further reading
Source checks run through 2026-08-26; every entry keeps its individual check date.
- Report-URI DMARC monitoring product page
Checked 2026-08-26
- Report-URI DMARC setup documentation
Checked 2026-08-26
- Report-URI public pricing and access check
Checked 2026-08-27
- Report-URI integrations overview
Checked 2026-08-27
- Report-URI teams and operational notifications documentation
Checked 2026-08-26
- Report-URI REST API documentation
Checked 2026-08-27
- Report-URI MCP documentation
Checked 2026-08-27
- Report-URI AI-agent documentation
Checked 2026-08-27
- Report-URI webhook documentation
Checked 2026-08-27
Palisade vs Report-URI: FAQ
Does Report-URI support DMARC reporting?
Yes. Report-URI accepts DMARC aggregate rua reports and enriches them with reporting and deliverability context. Its documentation says it does not support ruf forensic failure reports, because those can contain message samples.
Does Report-URI automatically move a domain to p=reject?
No. Report-URI's published workflow starts with p=none and tells the customer to tighten the policy to quarantine and then reject after reviewing the report evidence. It does not advertise an enforcement agent that prepares and executes each policy step for approval.
How much does Report-URI cost?
The public rate card lists Starter at $54.99 per month, Professional at $109.99, Business at $164.99, and Ultimate at $274.99. Enterprise pricing is custom. Those figures cover the wider Report-URI platform, whose published limits are based on domains, monthly events, retention, and feature access rather than a DMARC-only meter.
Does Report-URI offer a free trial?
Yes. Report-URI's pricing page says all self-service plans include a free trial, and its DMARC product page currently presents a 30-day free-trial call to action.
Does Report-URI have an API and integrations?
Yes. Report-URI documents a read-only REST API, MCP and AI-agent connections, webhooks, and operational destinations including Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat, Mattermost, and SIEM or log platforms. The pricing matrix marks API access and webhooks on higher self-service plans rather than every plan.
Which is better for an MSP, Report-URI or Palisade?
It depends on the work you need the platform to carry. Report-URI fits an MSP or security team that wants DMARC data alongside broader client-side security telemetry and is comfortable operating through teams, reports, and webhooks. Palisade fits an MSP that wants per-client-domain economics, PSA workflow, and an AI agent to investigate senders and prepare approved authentication and policy changes.
Switching from Report-URI takes three steps
- 1
Keep Report-URI receiving reports during the overlap
Add Palisade's reporting destination alongside the existing rua destination so both systems can observe the same mail while you compare findings. Keep the current policy in place during the evidence window.
- 2
Bring the sending inventory into Palisade
Add the domains you operate, review the sender evidence, and let the agent prepare SPF, DKIM, and policy work. Approve only the changes that match the legitimate sending sources you have confirmed.
- 3
Move approved records on your schedule
Use Palisade's scoped DNS connection or publish its approved records through your normal registrar workflow. Recheck authentication and delivery after each policy step, then remove the old Report-URI destination when you no longer need the parallel view.
Our onboarding team handles the technical transition with you.
Competitor information on this page was last reviewed against public sources on 2026-08-26. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.