DMARC Report alternative
DMARC Report vs Palisade in 2026
DMARC Report turns aggregate and forensic email-authentication reports into dashboards, alerts, and API data. Palisade adds an agentic operating model: its agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step—you approve before anything ships.
Our verdict: Pick DMARC Report if you want an established report-monitoring platform with forensic analysis, a REST API, hosted services, and a dedicated MSP program. Pick Palisade if you want an AI agent to carry investigation and authentication setup through each approved step toward p=reject.
Samuel Chenard · CEO & Co-Founder, PalisadeSource checks through 2026-08-261 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
Grok
Palisade
Palisade is free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Which one is right for you?
Best for Teams needing a REST API and MSP portal
Best for MSPs and IT teams responsible for multiple domains
- You want a dashboard that turns aggregate and forensic reports into sender, alignment, and policy views.
- You need a REST API for custom dashboards, SIEM workflows, alerts, or client reporting.
- Your MSP needs a multi-tenant portal, white-label reports, bulk CSV/API onboarding, and a dedicated partner program.
- Your procurement list includes DMARC Report's advertised SOC 2 Type II, SSO/SAML, RBAC, audit logs, or EU data residency options.
- You want an AI agent to investigate senders, draft SPF and DKIM fixes, and propose the policy progression rather than handing your team another report queue.
- You manage internal or client domains and want hosted records on redundant managed DNS plus Smart DNS Deployment through your DNS provider.
- You want the agent to do the analysis and configuration work while your team approves every change before it ships.
Free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Where the day-to-day work actually differs
| Feature | DMARC Report | Palisade |
|---|---|---|
| Enforcement | ||
| AI agent that investigates senders, drafts authentication fixes, and proposes each step toward p=rejectWhether authentication changes are prepared for approval before enforcement.DMARC Report advertises AI analysis, natural-language questions, and recommendations; it does not advertise an AI enforcement agent that drafts and carries each policy step (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | No agent advertised | Agent drafts and proposes |
| Reporting and analysis | ||
| DMARC aggregate report monitoring and sender visibilityWhether aggregate reports show sending sources and authentication status.DMARC Report says it converts aggregate XML into dashboards showing senders, authentication status, and enforcement readiness (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Aggregate sender dashboards | Agent analyzes reports |
| Forensic or failure reports with message-level authentication detailWhether failure reports expose message-level authentication evidence.DMARC Report advertises forensic reports with per-message failure details, headers, sender IP, alignment mismatch, and the failed mechanism (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Message-level failure details | Aggregate reports only |
| Email-vendor identification and SPF/DKIM alignment analysisWhether sending services are identified and SPF/DKIM alignment is measured.DMARC Report advertises automatic classification of 200+ sending vendors and alignment statistics in its dashboard and API (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Vendor classification and metrics | Agent investigates senders |
| Monitoring and automation | ||
| Continuous SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record monitoringWhether SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are watched for changes or failures.DMARC Report says it watches SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records and alerts when records change, break, or need attention (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Record-change alerts | Continuous monitoring |
| Authentication-rate, unauthorized-sender, DNS-change, email, webhook, and Slack alertsWhether alerts flag authentication changes and reach operational channels.DMARC Report advertises alert management for authentication-rate drops, new unauthorized senders, DNS changes, and email, webhook, and Slack delivery (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Email, webhook, Slack | New-ticket alerts |
| Limits & metering | ||
| REST API access on every planWhether every plan includes programmatic access to DMARC data.DMARC Report's pricing page lists API access starting with Shield; Core and Guard do not advertise it as included (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Starts on Shield | Included on every plan |
| MSP operations | ||
| Multi-tenant client portal with isolated client viewsWhether one workspace separates each client's domains and access.DMARC Report advertises one multi-tenant portal, per-client views, role-based access, and client access portals for MSP partners (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Per-client portal views | Multi-tenant management |
| White-label client reporting and branded interfaceWhether client-facing reports and interfaces can carry a provider's branding.DMARC Report advertises white-label PDF reports and a white-label domain, and its support article describes a branded client interface (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | White-label reports and domain | White-label client reports |
| Native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrationsWhether named PSA tools connect to client-domain workflows.DMARC Report's AI page advertises Slack, Jira, PagerDuty, spreadsheet export and PDF generation, but neither it nor the product pages advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA or Autotask connectors (checked 2026-08-27). The older integrations FAQ, last modified 2022, says there are no integrations at all; the live pages supersede it. Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | No PSA integrations advertised | Native PSA integrations |
| Hosted records & DNS | ||
| Hosted DMARC and MTA-STS servicesWhether the service hosts DMARC and MTA-STS records.DMARC Report's pricing and API documentation advertise MTA-STS/TLS-RPT plans and hosted DMARC and MTA-STS verification endpoints (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Hosted verification endpoints | Hosted on managed DNS |
| SPF flattening in the DMARC Report productWhether SPF DNS lookups are reduced before publication.DMARC Report advertises SPF lookup monitoring, while its site points to sister product AutoSPF for dedicated SPF flattening; it does not advertise SPF flattening in DMARC Report (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Not advertised in product | Hosted SPF flattening |
| AI and automation access | ||
| REST API for AI assistants and custom workflowsWhether software and AI assistants can query DMARC data through documented endpoints.DMARC Report publishes token-authenticated API endpoints for accounts, domains, reports, alerts, and compliance data. Its AI page says Claude Code, ChatGPT, and other AI tools can use the REST API. Its public plan wording conflicts: the AI page says API access is included on all paid plans, while the pricing matrix lists it starting with Shield (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27) | Documented REST API | REST API published |
| MCP server for connecting AI assistants to domain dataWhether an AI assistant can reach the product's data directly.DMARC Report labels its MCP server as coming soon and says it is not yet available in its FAQ; it does not advertise a released MCP server (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | MCP server on roadmap | MCP server published |
| AI analysis of DMARC reports and sender findingsWhether the vendor advertises AI inside the product and states what it does.DMARC Report says its built-in AI analyzes XML reports, identifies sender patterns, surfaces anomalies, and explains what needs attention. It also promotes API use for AI reporting, alerts, and compliance workflows (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | AI analyzes report data | Agent drafts fixes |
| Programmatic report export and scheduled deliveryWhether report data can leave the dashboard through a published programmatic route.DMARC Report says its API returns JSON, can feed BI and reporting tools, and can support client summaries delivered on a schedule. Its AI page gives examples of spreadsheet exports and PDF generation; it does not advertise native scheduled exports or webhooks on that page (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | API feeds external tools | REST API published |
Want to compare the workflow yourself? Try Palisade free with one domain and up to 1,000 emails a month.
Palisade 96 vs DMARC Report 63, and why
Both products are scored on the same eight dimensions the comparison hub uses, so the figures here are the figures there. Four are derived from vendor facts that each carry a source and a checked date. Four are editorial, marked as such below, and each states its reasoning and its source.
Each dimension is out of 10 and the total is the raw sum out of 80, rescaled to 100 — the raw figure is printed beside it so the conversion is checkable rather than a black box. Scored on what each vendor publishes, not on how the product feels in use. Editorial dimensions last reviewed 2026-08-30.
How reachable the product is from your own software and AI tools. 10 = a documented API on every plan plus a published MCP server. 6 = an API, gated to a tier or to a sales conversation. 3 = no programmatic access advertised.
DMARC Report publishes a token-authenticated REST API for account, domain, and aggregate-report data, but no MCP server (checked 2026-08-30). Source (2026-08-30)
Palisade publishes a REST API and a remote MCP server on every plan, making the same domain data and remediation workflows available to connected software. Source (2026-08-30)
How much of the report analysis is done for you. 10 = the platform turns raw report data into a prioritised, actionable queue on its own.
AI analysis identifies sender patterns and actionable issues, and the documented REST API supports automated reports and compliance workflows. Source (2026-08-30)
Report data is analysed into a prioritised list of sender, SPF, DKIM and DMARC issues, so nobody reads raw XML. Source (2026-07-29)
How much of the work the vendor's own software does. 10 = it identifies the sending sources, drafts the SPF and DKIM fixes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step. 6 = it applies the records for you, but a person decides what to fix and when to advance. 3 = it reports, and every change is yours to make. A vendor whose team does the work rather than its software scores here on the software alone.
The software identifies sending sources and surfaces AI-assisted findings, while every SPF, DKIM, and policy change remains yours to make. Source (2026-08-28)
The agent investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes it needs, and proposes the next policy step; a human approves before deployment. Source (2026-08-30)
10 = full pricing published. 6 = some tiers published, rest quote-gated. 3 = quote only.
A public plans page covers SMB, enterprise, and MSP packages; the current rendered text does not expose all numeric amounts. Source (2026-08-28)
Published: free plan, then flat monthly plans by email volume from $19/mo Source (2026-08-30)
10 = hosts the records for you. 6 = partial or add-on. 3 = you manage your own DNS.
The reviewed product pages publish monitoring and management but do not clearly document hosted DMARC, SPF, or DKIM records. Source (2026-08-28)
10 = a genuine free plan. 6 = time-limited trial only. 3 = no free access.
The platform advertises the first domain free and also offers a no-card trial. Source (2026-08-28)
Free plan: one domain, up to 1,000 emails/mo, 14-day report history, no credit card, plus a 15-day full-product trial Source (2026-08-30)
10 = a real MSP program with multi-tenant management. 6 = partial. 3 = none.
Yes: a multi-tenant partner programme with white-label management, role-based access, partner levels, deal registration, training, and support. Source (2026-08-28)
How much work it takes to get a domain from p=none to p=reject. 10 = the platform (or the vendor's team) gets you there without manual DNS edits.
The platform publishes monitoring and management workflows with partner onboarding, while hosted authentication records are not clearly documented. Source (2026-08-28)
The DMARC Agent detects when a domain's authentication and alignment are ready for the next policy stage and proposes the move, but a human still approves and applies it, so it is not fully hands-off. Source (2026-07-29)
Recommendations vs approved execution
A capable report platform with an operator-led enforcement boundary
DMARC Report is a cloud-based email-authentication monitoring platform. Its product pages describe aggregate dashboards, forensic failure reports, vendor identification, alignment results, policy evaluation, and alerts across domains. The AI layer can analyze reports in natural language, identify unauthorized senders, explain failures, and recommend next steps. That is meaningful parity for teams that want report data organized and queryable. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26)
The distinction is what happens after a sender or alignment problem is found. DMARC Report's public AI material describes analysis and recommendations, while its API material says customers build their own automated workflows and integrations. Its pricing page separately advertises Done With You enforcement and a dedicated DMARC engineer on Ultimate. DMARC Report does not advertise an AI agent that drafts SPF/DKIM changes and proposes each policy step for approval (checked 2026-08-26). Palisade's agent owns that investigation and drafting loop; your team remains the release gate. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
- No agent advertised
- Agent drafts and proposes
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
API coverage vs plan access
Strong API and hosted-service coverage, with plan gates
The DMARC Report API is more than a CSV export. Its documentation lists account, domain, aggregate-report, forensic-report, alert, BIMI, MTA-STS, email-source, and member resources. It can return top sources, alignment failures, trends, compliance summaries, and PDF audit reports, while domain endpoints can generate a DMARC record and verify hosted DMARC or MTA-STS setup. That makes DMARC Report a reasonable fit when the central requirement is feeding normalized authentication data into another system. Source (2026-08-26)
The catch is packaging. The pricing page puts API access on Shield and higher self-serve tiers, not on Core or Guard. DMARC Report's public integrations FAQ says there are currently no integrations, so a team wanting a PSA or ticketing connection should expect to build and maintain that connection through the API. Palisade includes API access on every plan and offers native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrations for MSP accounts, so the operational question is whether your team wants an API project or a product workflow ready for its service desk. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
Native PSA integrations
Palisade imports client domains straight from these three. DMARC Report's own coverage is stated above, from their site.
- ConnectWise PSA
- Autotask
- HaloPSA
- Starts on Shield
- Included on every plan
MSP tooling vs remediation ownership
MSP tooling is real parity; the work model is the decision
DMARC Report takes MSP delivery seriously. Its partner program advertises a multi-tenant dashboard, isolated per-client views, white-label PDF reports, bulk CSV/API onboarding, role-based access, customer portals, white-glove onboarding, and a dedicated partner support channel. The MSP plans also describe widget embeds, white-label domains, aggregate geomaps, advanced alerts, and managed services. An MSP that wants to package monitoring and reporting under its own brand can find the expected building blocks here. Source (2026-08-26)
The concession for DMARC Report is narrow: it fits an MSP that already has the people and process to turn a report finding into a DNS change, or that wants to buy its Done With You service. Palisade is aimed at a different handoff. Its agent investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM work, detects policy readiness, and proposes the move toward p=reject; the customer approves each step before anything ships. That makes the page-to-page comparison less about whether either product can monitor client domains and more about who carries the remediation queue across the portfolio. Source (2026-08-26)
- Per-client portal views
- White-label reports and domain
- No PSA integrations advertised
- Multi-tenant management
- White-label client reports
- Native PSA integrations
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Volume pricing vs portfolio pricing
Message-volume pricing versus portfolio-based MSP economics
DMARC Report's self-serve pricing is easy to inspect, but the meter deserves attention. Core starts at 10,000 monthly messages, Guard at 250,000, Shield at 1,000,000, and Defender at 3,000,000; the support documentation explains that each individual email record represented inside incoming reports counts toward the plan. Domain ceilings also vary by tier. For an internal team, that can be a sensible way to match the bill to the amount of mail being observed. For an MSP, the relevant budget question is how many client domains and how much client volume sit under one plan. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
Palisade publishes a separate MSP model: pay per client domain, with a rate that improves as the portfolio grows, no client email metering, and a free NFR domain for the provider. Its internal IT plans remain flat monthly tiers by email volume, while the agentic workflow reduces the manual investigation and configuration work that volume-based monitoring still leaves to an operator. Compare both the line-item price and the labor required to maintain every domain at the enforcement stage you want. Source (2026-08-26)
What each side charges
Three points on each published range: the cheapest plan, one in the middle, and the top of what the vendor publishes. Every plan on both sides is in the pricing section further down.
- Core$0
10,000 monthly messages, 1 domain, subdomains, 30 days of data history, aggregate reports
- Defender$200/mo
3,000,000 monthly messages, 25 domains, everything in Shield, advanced API and failure reports, advanced support
- MSP Armor$400/mo
7,000,000 monthly reports, 50 domains, 1 year of history, everything in Sentinel, enhanced API, reputation monitoring, managed services, advanced support
- Free$0
1 domain, your own, capped at 1,000 emails/mo
- IT teams: up to 500,000 emails/mo$59/mo ($47/mo billed annually)
Same product: 6 set-up domains, pick the tier that matches your sending
- Enterprise (more than 2.5M / month)Custom
Custom volume, retention, and terms
- Hosted verification endpoints
- Record-change alerts
- Aggregate sender dashboards
- Hosted on managed DNS
- Continuous monitoring
- Agent analyzes reports
Dashboard access vs programmatic access
DMARC Report connects AI tools over REST while its MCP server remains on the roadmap
DMARC Report publishes a token-authenticated REST API for account, domain, report, alert, and compliance data, and its AI page shows Claude Code, ChatGPT, and other AI tools calling that API. It says API access is included on all paid plans on the AI page, while its pricing matrix lists API access starting with Shield. The same AI page says API output can feed dashboards, scheduled client reporting, spreadsheet exports, and PDF generation. It labels the MCP server as coming soon and says it is not yet available, so REST is the vendor's published AI-assistant route (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27)
Palisade publishes an MCP server at /mcp. Its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step. A human approves before anything ships.
Reachable from your own AI tools
Palisade's MCP server exposes 30 tools over OAuth, so the assistant your team already uses can read domains, pull the exact records to publish and work the task queue. These are the clients the connection guide walks through.
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Cursor
- Windsurf
- Any MCP client
- Documented REST API
- MCP server on roadmap
- AI analyzes report data
- REST API published
- MCP server published
- Agent drafts fixes
Still deciding between DMARC Report and Palisade? See what changes with Palisade.
1 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
Microsoft 365
Zoho Mail
The agent does the heavy lifting
Sources identified, SPF and DKIM fixes drafted, each policy step proposed. You approve; nothing ships on its own.
Connect your AI with MCP
30 tools over MCP, so your assistant reads your domains and works the queue.
Connect your DNS manager directly
Approved records go into your own zone at your own provider, across 64. No credentials reach us.
“We evaluated many DMARC providers before choosing Palisade. The quality of their product, the responsiveness and friendliness of their team and their rapid progress on their product roadmap made it a no-brainer for us to move forward.”
DMARC Report pricing explained (and how Palisade compares)
DMARC Report publishes self-serve plans that meter monthly message records and domain count, plus separate MSP plans. The pricing page showed these options when checked on August 26, 2026:
What you'd actually pay
The same five buyer sizes on every comparison, so a shape carries from one page to the next.
1 domain, up to 1,000 emails a month
Core: 1 domain and 10,000 monthly messages; no 1,000-message tier published
2 set-up domains, up to 100K emails a month
Guard: 5 domains and 250,000 monthly messages; no 2-domain or 100,000-message tier published
10 set-up domains, up to 1M emails a month
Shield: 10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly messages
20 set-up domains, up to 2.5M emails a month
Defender: 25 domains and 3,000,000 monthly messages; no 20-domain or 2.5-million-message tier published
Client domains under management, any volume
MSP plans cap monthly reports; no any-volume MSP price is published
Palisade’s figures are derived from its published tiers. DMARC Report figures read from their pricing page on 2026-08-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
How DMARC Report prices
- The vendor defines a billable DMARC report as an individual email record inside an aggregate or forensic report, not merely the XML file itself.
- The pricing page says paid plans include a 30-day free trial with no credit card required. If no payment method is added, the account downgrades to Core after the trial.
- DMARC Report also advertises an Ultimate tier displayed at $3,900 with unlimited domains, three years of history, a dedicated DMARC engineer, and Done With You enforcement; the page does not label the displayed amount with a billing interval.
- The MSP page advertises white-glove onboarding, a multi-tenant portal, and a 50% partner discount on list pricing, with additional volume discounts described at 50+ and 200+ domains.
How Palisade prices
- Palisade's Free plan covers one domain and up to 1,000 emails/month. Paid IT-team plans are flat monthly prices sized by email volume, starting at $19/month, with 20% off on annual billing.
- Palisade paid IT tiers cap set-up domains at 2, 3, 6, 10, or 20 by volume tier; adding domains is free and unlimited, and only set-up domains count against the tier.
- Palisade's MSP model is quoted per client domain with a rate that improves as your portfolio grows. Client email volume is not metered, and your own MSP domain is a free NFR license.
- Palisade's 15-day full-product trial requires no credit card. The agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes policy steps for approval instead of making unreviewed DNS or policy changes.
DMARC Report pricing read from their public pricing page on 2026-08-26.Plans and prices may have changed since.
Try Palisade free on one domain, or start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
What each one covers, and where it stops
Published facts only, read from each vendor's own material. Neither column describes a hands-on trial, because we have not run one.
DMARC Report turns aggregate and forensic email-authentication reports into dashboards, alerts, and API data for teams monitoring sending sources, authentication results, and policy readiness. Its cloud platform covers vendor identification, alignment analysis, failure reports, DNS record monitoring, and AI-assisted report analysis, giving operators report data to investigate and use in their own workflows.
DMARC Report also targets MSPs that need multi-tenant client views, white-label reports, bulk onboarding, and customer portals. Its self-serve plans meter monthly message records and domain count, while separate MSP plans add partner access and white-glove onboarding. REST API access and hosted verification endpoints fit teams that need report data and hosted services in a central platform.
Palisade is built around an agent that does the DMARC work rather than reporting on it. It identifies every sending source, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step when the evidence supports it.
The agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step, you approve before anything ships.
- Provides aggregate sender dashboards for DMARC monitoring and sender visibility
- Provides message-level failure details in forensic reports
- Provides vendor classification and metrics for email senders
- Provides record-change alerts for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records
- Provides per-client portal views for MSP partners
- The agent investigates senders and drafts the fix, so the work arrives prepared rather than as a list of findings
- Hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC on redundant managed DNS, so an approved change can be carried out rather than handed off
- Portfolio workflow for MSPs, with ConnectWise, HaloPSA and Autotask integrations and a free NFR domain
- An MCP server and a REST API, so the same data and workflow are reachable from the AI tools a team already uses
- Does not advertise an AI agent that drafts authentication fixes and carries each policy step
- Does not advertise REST API access on Core or Guard; the pricing page starts API access on Shield
- Does not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations
- Does not advertise SPF flattening in the DMARC Report product
- Does not advertise a released MCP server for connecting AI assistants to domain data
- Every policy change waits for a human approval, by design: nothing ships on the agent's own authority
- MSP pricing is quoted per client domain rather than published as a rate card
- Plans are sized by monthly email volume, so a low-domain, high-volume sender lands on a higher tier than domain count alone suggests
- Starts at
- $0 (Core)
- Free tier
- 1 domain, 10,000 monthly messages
- Data history
- 30 days to 3 years
- Paid trial
- 30 days, no card required
- MSP entry
- $100/mo, 25 domains
- Starts at
- Free, then $19/mo
- Free tier
- 1 domain, up to 1,000 emails/month
- Trial
- 15 days, full product, no credit card
- MSP model
- Quoted per client domain, portfolio-based
“Palisade made it so easy for us to get our blue verified checkmark and achieve our BIMI compliance”
Sources and further reading
Source checks run through 2026-08-26; every entry keeps its individual check date.
- DMARC Report homepage
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARC Report pricing
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARC Report features
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARC Report AI + API
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARC Report MSP Partner Program
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARC Report API documentation
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARC Report domain setup support
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARC Report integrations FAQ
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARC Report homepage, current AI review
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARC Report AI and API, current review
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARC Report pricing, current API review
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARC Report API documentation, current review
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARC Report features, current review
Checked 2026-08-27
Palisade vs DMARC Report: FAQ
What is the main difference between DMARC Report and Palisade?
DMARC Report is centered on aggregate and forensic report monitoring, dashboards, alerts, API access, and MSP reporting. Palisade is agentic: its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step toward p=reject while your team approves before anything ships.
Does DMARC Report have an AI enforcement agent?
DMARC Report advertises AI report analysis, natural-language questions, sender identification, explanations, and recommendations. It does not advertise an AI enforcement agent that drafts authentication changes and carries each policy step through approval. Its separate Ultimate and MSP materials describe Done With You enforcement with human DMARC engineers.
Does DMARC Report offer an API and integrations?
It publishes a REST API for accounts, domains, reports, alerts, sources, alignment data, and hosted-service verification. Its support FAQ currently says there are no integrations, so ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask are not advertised as native integrations. Palisade includes API access on every plan and native PSA integrations for MSP accounts.
How much does DMARC Report cost?
The published self-serve plans checked August 26, 2026 were Core at $0, Guard at $25/month, Shield at $75/month, and Defender at $200/month. The vendor also lists MSP Framework at $100/month, MSP Sentinel at $250/month, and MSP Armor at $400/month. Plans are tied to message volume and domain counts; confirm current pricing before buying.
Is there a free DMARC Report plan or trial?
Yes. Core is listed as free with 10,000 monthly messages, one domain, 30 days of history, and aggregate reports. The pricing page also advertises a 30-day free trial for paid plans with no credit card required. Palisade offers a separate 15-day full-product trial with no card required.
Can I run DMARC Report and Palisade at the same time?
Yes. DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so you can send reports to both platforms during an evaluation window. Keep the DNS policy changes coordinated, compare sender and alignment findings, and move the reporting destination fully when your team is ready.
Switching from DMARC Report takes three steps
- 1
Batch-import your domains
Bring your client domains into Palisade in bulk, or let your ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integration sync them automatically.
- 2
Run both platforms in parallel
DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so Palisade and DMARC Report receive the same reports during the overlap window. Nothing breaks while you compare.
- 3
Cut DNS over on your schedule
Point records at Palisade's hosted infrastructure (redundant managed DNS), then retire the old setup when you're satisfied.
Our onboarding team handles the technical transition with you.
Competitor information on this page was last reviewed against public sources on 2026-08-26. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.