Netcraft Fraud Detection vs Palisade in 2026
Netcraft combines DMARC visualization with broad digital-risk protection, domain monitoring, threat intelligence, and takedown workflows. Palisade is focused on the authentication work itself: its AI agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step for your approval.
Our verdict: Netcraft Fraud Detection fits a security or fraud team that wants DMARC visibility alongside lookalike-domain monitoring, phishing detection, threat intelligence, and takedown operations. Pick Palisade when the priority is an agentic DMARC workflow that investigates senders, configures authentication, and carries domains toward p=reject with your approval at every step. The choice is breadth of digital-risk coverage versus depth of hands-on DMARC execution.
15-day full-product trial. Nothing is charged until it ends.


Provisional · 3/8 dimensions established
Average of established dimensions; may change as remaining dimensions are verified.
Full rubric · 8/8 dimensions established
Palisade's IT-team plans start at $19 a month, sized by email volume. Start with a 15-day full-product trial; nothing is charged until it ends.
Which one is right for you?
Best for Security or fraud teams needing lookalike monitoring and takedowns
Best for MSPs and IT teams responsible for multiple domains
- You want DMARC visualization inside a wider brand-protection program covering lookalike domains, phishing, social channels, and takedowns.
- Your security stack already uses tools such as Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Cortex XSOAR/XSIAM, ThreatConnect, or Slack, and a custom quote is acceptable.
- You want an AI agent to investigate senders, configure SPF and DKIM, and propose each move toward p=reject for your team to approve.
- You run an internal IT team or MSP operation where repeatable DMARC work, client-domain economics, hosted records, and PSA integrations matter more than broad takedown coverage.
IT-team plans start at $19 a month, sized by email volume. Start with a 15-day full-product trial; nothing is charged until it ends.
Where the day-to-day work actually differs
| Feature | Netcraft Fraud Detection | Palisade |
|---|---|---|
| Enforcement | ||
| AI agent that investigates senders and carries policy work toward p=reject with approvalWhether a workflow investigates senders, drafts fixes, and proposes policy steps for approval.Netcraft advertises DMARC analysis, DNS validation, traffic mapping, and tailored recommendations; it does not advertise an AI agent that configures SPF/DKIM and advances policy steps for approval (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | No agent-led workflow | Agent drafts and proposes |
| DMARC report visualization and unauthorized-sender analysisWhether DMARC reports identify and display unauthorized sending.Netcraft says DMARC Visualization turns technical reports into charts and insights and helps identify unauthorized email activity. Source (2026-08-26) | Charts and insights | Agent analyzes reports |
| DNS validation and recommendations for DMARC and SPF recordsWhether a product checks authentication records and recommends updates.Netcraft advertises DNS-record validation and tailored recommendations for DMARC and SPF records. Source (2026-08-26) | Validation and recommendations | Agent drafts record fixes |
| Hosted records & DNS | ||
| Hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM recordsWhether a provider hosts the named email-authentication DNS records.Netcraft's public DMARC pages advertise validation and recommendations, not hosted DMARC, SPF, or DKIM records (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | —Not advertised | Hosted authentication records |
| SPF flatteningWhether SPF records are flattened to stay within DNS lookup limits.SPF flattening is not advertised on Netcraft's public DMARC Visualization, Domain Protection, or pricing pages (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | —Not advertised | Hosted SPF flattening |
| Limits & metering | ||
| Published report-retention termsWhether a product publishes how long it retains report history.Netcraft's public pricing and DMARC pages do not publish a report-retention period (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | —Not published | Unlimited IT/MSP; Enterprise customSource |
| MSP operations | ||
| Native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrationsWhether a product connects directly to the named PSA tools.Netcraft's public integrations page names Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Cortex XSOAR/XSIAM, ThreatConnect, and Slack; it does not advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | PSA integrations not advertised | Native PSA integrations |
| Portfolio-based MSP pricing and multi-tenant client managementWhether MSPs can manage client portfolios with portfolio-based pricing.Netcraft's public pricing page offers a custom-tailored quote and does not advertise MSP pricing or multi-tenant client management (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | —Not advertised | Portfolio pricing, multi-tenant |
| Workflow integrations | ||
| Security-platform integrations for incident responseWhether a product connects to SOC tools for intelligence, incident, and takedown work.Netcraft advertises integrations with Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Cortex XSOAR, Cortex XSIAM, ThreatConnect, and Slack for intelligence, incident, takedown, and alert workflows (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28) | SOC response integrations | No SOC response integrations |
| Native PSA integrations for client-domain operationsWhether a product connects to ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask for domain and ticket workflows.Netcraft's public Integrations & APIs page does not advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28) | PSA integrations not advertised | Native PSA integrations |
| Customer API access for custom workflowsWhether customers can connect product data and actions to their own workflows through an API.Netcraft advertises Takedown, Classification, and Screenshot APIs and says customers receive documentation, onboarding guidance, and implementation support (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28) | Customer workflow APIs | REST API on every plan |
| Security operations | ||
| Threat-intelligence and takedown APIsWhether a product offers APIs for threat-intelligence and takedown workflows.Netcraft advertises customer APIs for takedown management, threat classification, and screenshot retrieval, with documentation and onboarding guidance for customers. Source (2026-08-26) | Customer threat APIs | No takedown API |
| Lookalike-domain monitoring and phishing takedown workflowsWhether a product monitors lookalike domains and supports phishing takedowns.Netcraft says it monitors look-alike domains, identifies malicious impersonations, and submits confirmed threats for takedown. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Monitoring and takedowns | No takedown workflow |
| Security-stack integrations and bi-directional response workflowsWhether a product connects to security tools for two-way incident response.Netcraft advertises integrations with Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Cortex XSOAR/XSIAM, ThreatConnect, and Slack, including takedown and incident-response actions in several integrations. Source (2026-08-26) | SOC tools and workflows | No SOC response integrations |
| AI and automation access | ||
| Documented programmatic API access for threat workflowsWhether a customer can use documented APIs to build a threat-data or takedown workflow.Netcraft advertises Takedown, Classification, and Screenshot APIs for customer workflows, and says customers receive full documentation, onboarding guidance, and implementation support. Its public integrations page says the official integrations help page is available to current customers only and does not publish API plan-tier access (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | Customer APIs advertised | REST API published |
| MCP server for connecting AI assistants to domain dataWhether an AI assistant can reach the product's data directly.Netcraft does not advertise an MCP server or an AI-assistant integration on its public Integrations & APIs page, which describes API families, named security-platform integrations, and customer-only integration documentation (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | —No MCP server listed | MCP server published |
| Advertised AI-driven scam detectionWhether the vendor advertises AI or machine-learning work inside the product.Netcraft advertises Scam Intelligence that uses AI-driven victim emulation in live conversations with scammers to detect and intercept scams. Its financial-services page also says its brand-protection service combines automation, AI, machine learning, and human insight (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | AI-driven scam detection | Agent drafts and proposes |
| Threat data available outside the dashboardWhether product data can leave through a documented API, export, or threat feed.Netcraft's Threat API announcement says the API provides machine-readable CSV and JSON data for infrastructure providers. Its integrations page also describes APIs that feed Netcraft intelligence into internal dashboards and custom security workflows; neither page advertises scheduled exports or webhooks (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | CSV and JSON threat feed | REST API published |
Want to compare the workflow yourself? Start a 15-day full-product trial of Palisade.
Palisade vs Netcraft Fraud Detection: score evidence and limitations
Both products are scored on the same eight dimensions the comparison hub uses, so the figures here are the figures there. Four are derived from vendor facts that each carry a source and a checked date. Four are editorial, marked as such below, and each states its reasoning and its source.
Each dimension is out of 10 and the total is the raw sum out of 80, rescaled to 100 — the raw figure is printed beside it so the conversion is checkable rather than a black box. Scored on what each vendor publishes, not on how the product feels in use. Unknown scoring dimensions are shown as Not established; provisional scores average only established dimensions and show coverage. They may change as remaining dimensions are verified. Current ranks include full and provisional scores; equal displayed scores share a rank. Historical assessments are separate. Editorial dimensions last reviewed 2026-10-15.
Provisional · 3/8 dimensions established
Average of established dimensions; may change as remaining dimensions are verified.
Full rubric · 8/8 dimensions established
How reachable the vendor's DMARC data is from your own software and AI tools. Two paths count, an API and an MCP server, and each only if it reaches DMARC data (domains, records, reports or sending sources). A path is open when it is documented and included from the cheapest paid plan; gated when it needs a higher tier, an add-on, a sales call or a request, or the vendor does not say which plans include it. 10 = both open. 9 = one open, one gated. 8 = both gated. 7 = one open, the other absent. 6 = one gated, the other absent. 5 = access claimed in marketing only, with no docs or plan listing. 4 = reachable only through a self-hosted tool's own interface or a host platform's API, such as parsedmarc's library or Splunk's REST API; a dashboard over a database you run yourself does not count. 3 = no API or MCP server reaches DMARC data.
Netcraft documents threat-response APIs and separately lists DMARC Visualization. The reviewed integrations page does not resolve whether a path reaches DMARC data. Source (2026-10-14)
Palisade publishes a REST API and a remote MCP server on every plan, making the same domain data and remediation workflows available to connected software. Source (2026-08-30)
How much of the report analysis is done for you. 10 = the platform turns raw report data into a prioritised, actionable queue on its own.
Netcraft documents substantial automated takedown and dashboard work. The 9-point rationale also relies on APIs and bi-directional SIEM/SOAR integrations not cited to this claim. Source (2026-08-28)
Report data is analysed into a prioritised list of sender, SPF, DKIM and DMARC issues, so nobody reads raw XML. Source (2026-08-30)
How much of the work the vendor's own software does. 10 = it identifies the sending sources, drafts the SPF and DKIM fixes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step. 6 = it applies the records for you, but a person decides what to fix and when to advance. 3 = it reports, and every change is yours to make. A vendor whose team does the work rather than its software scores here on the software alone.
Netcraft DMARC Visualization validates DNS and provides tailored, actionable DMARC and SPF recommendations. The reviewed material does not document delegated authentication-record hosting or approval-based policy execution; broad fraud takedown automation is a separate workflow. Source (2026-10-13)
The agent investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes it needs, and proposes the next policy step; a human approves before deployment. Source (2026-08-30)
10 = full pricing published. 6 = some tiers published, rest quote-gated. 3 = quote only.
Pricing is custom and obtained through a quote request; no public package amounts are listed. Source (2026-08-28)
Self-service IT-team prices are published by email volume from $19/month; MSP pricing is portfolio-based per client domain, and Enterprise pricing is custom. Source (2026-08-30)
10 = hosts the records for you. 6 = partial or add-on. 3 = you manage your own DNS.
No: the service monitors brand and domain abuse and visualizes DMARC but does not publish hosted email-authentication records. Source (2026-08-28)
Yes: hosted DMARC, SPF, DKIM, BIMI & MTA-STS Source (2026-08-30)
10 = a genuine free plan. 6 = time-limited trial only. 3 = no free access.
No ongoing free enterprise Fraud Detection plan is published. Source (2026-08-28)
No free plan: a 15-day full-product trial; nothing is charged until the trial ends Source (2026-09-25)
10 = a real MSP program with multi-tenant management. 6 = partial. 3 = none.
Netcraft publishes a channel program for resellers, MSSPs, technology providers and advisors, with dedicated partner onboarding and deployment support. DMARC-specific tenant, pricing, isolation and resale-margin terms are not published on that page. Source (2026-10-13)
Yes: MSP-first, multi-tenant with native PSA integrations Source (2026-08-30)
How much work it takes to get a domain from p=none to p=reject. 10 = the platform (or the vendor's team) gets you there without manual DNS edits.
DMARC visualization can highlight insecure configurations, but the product does not publish a hosted-record or staged email-policy enforcement workflow. Source (2026-08-28)
The DMARC Agent detects when a domain's authentication and alignment are ready for the next policy stage and proposes the move, but a human still approves and applies it, so it is not fully hands-off. Source (2026-08-30)
Where Palisade and Netcraft Fraud Detection actually differ
Each argument keeps the product screens, sourced comparison points, and supporting analysis together.
Managed depth vs reporting breadth
Netcraft visualizes DMARC; Palisade carries the authentication work
Netcraft's DMARC Visualization is a real parity point for visibility. Its product page says the feature turns technical reports into easy-to-read charts and insights, maps traffic across domains, validates DNS records, and recommends changes to DMARC and SPF records. Domain Protection also positions the feature as a way to defend against business email compromise and automatically handle incoming reports of misuse. That is useful when the security team wants email-authentication evidence in the same environment as broader brand-risk signals.Source
Netcraft Fraud Detection
A relevant product screenshot was not available in the reviewed evidence.
- AI agent that investigates senders and carries policy work toward p=reject with approval: No agent-led workflowSource
- DMARC report visualization and unauthorized-sender analysis: Charts and insightsSource
- DNS validation and recommendations for DMARC and SPF records: Validation and recommendationsSource
Palisade
A relevant product screenshot was not available in the reviewed evidence.
- AI agent that investigates senders and carries policy work toward p=reject with approval: Agent drafts and proposes
- DMARC report visualization and unauthorized-sender analysis: Agent analyzes reports
- DNS validation and recommendations for DMARC and SPF records: Agent drafts record fixes
The operating distinction is what happens after the report is understood. Netcraft's public DMARC material describes recommendations and record updates to identify, not an agent that configures SPF and DKIM or advances a policy stage with an operator's approval (checked 2026-08-26). Palisade's agent investigates sending sources, drafts authentication fixes, and proposes each move toward p=reject; your team approves before anything ships. The difference is execution ownership, not whether either product can show DMARC data.
Quote pricing vs published terms
What Netcraft's custom quote leaves out
Netcraft's pricing page is intentionally high-level. It says the team will discuss a buyer's needs and prepare a custom-tailored quote, with the surrounding platform positioned around accurate detection, threat intelligence, and takedown speed. The page does not give a product tier, per-domain amount, email-volume band, retention window, trial length, or MSP rate. A buyer can request a quote, but cannot model the cost of a 10-domain DMARC rollout from the public page alone (checked 2026-08-26).Source 1, Source 2
Netcraft Fraud Detection
A relevant product screenshot was not available in the reviewed evidence.
- Published report-retention terms: Not publishedSource
Palisade
A relevant product screenshot was not available in the reviewed evidence.
- Published report-retention terms: Unlimited IT/MSP; Enterprise customSource
Palisade makes the smaller-team decision easier to price before a conversation. IT-team plans are flat monthly rates from $19 to $249, with set-up-domain limits that rise from 2 to 20 and free, unlimited domain adding. MSPs receive a portfolio-based per-client-domain quote with a minimum of 5 client domains, no client email metering, and a free NFR domain. The two models serve different buying motions: a broad enterprise security platform sold through discovery versus a DMARC operating layer with a published entry point.
What each side charges
Three points on each published range: the cheapest plan, one in the middle, and the top of what the vendor publishes. Every plan on both sides is in the pricing section further down.
- Netcraft platformCustom-tailored quote
Scope, volume, report retention, trial terms, and MSP packaging are not published on the public pricing page
- IT teams: up to 100,000 emails/mo$19/mo ($15/mo billed annually)
2 set-up domains (adding is unlimited), unlimited retention, every core feature
- IT teams: up to 1,000,000 emails/mo$99/mo ($79/mo billed annually)
Same product: 10 set-up domains, pick the tier that matches your sending
- Enterprise (more than 2.5M / month)Custom
Custom volume, retention, and terms
SOC response vs service workflow
Netcraft's security-stack integrations vs a DMARC service workflow
Netcraft's public integrations page is specific about the systems it serves. It names Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Cortex XSOAR and XSIAM, ThreatConnect, and Slack. The described workflows include ingesting intelligence, creating incidents, requesting and authorizing takedowns, tracking status, and enriching investigations. Netcraft also advertises customer APIs for takedown management, threat classification, and screenshots, with documentation and onboarding guidance available to customers. For a SOC or fraud team, those are meaningful parity points and a credible reason to keep Netcraft in the shortlist.Source
Netcraft Fraud Detection
A relevant product screenshot was not available in the reviewed evidence.
Palisade

- Security-platform integrations for incident response: No SOC response integrations
- Native PSA integrations for client-domain operations: Native PSA integrations
- Customer API access for custom workflows: REST API on every plan
The same page does not advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask, and says the official integrations help page is available to current customers only (checked 2026-08-26). That makes the public evidence clear about security-stack integration but not about an MSP service desk workflow. Palisade's native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrations are aimed at importing and operating client domains; its API is available on every plan. If tickets, client ownership, and repeatable domain onboarding sit at the center of the workflow, evaluate those paths separately from Netcraft's threat-response integrations.
Native PSA integrations
Palisade imports client domains straight from these three. Netcraft Fraud Detection's own coverage is stated above, from their site.
- ConnectWise PSA
- Autotask
- HaloPSA
Fraud response vs DMARC focus
Netcraft Fraud Detection fits when DMARC is one signal among many
Netcraft's strongest differentiator is breadth around the brand, not only the mailbox. Its Domain Protection page describes monitoring newly registered look-alike domains and hostnames, checking them for changes every day, identifying malicious impersonations, and submitting confirmed cases for takedown. Its Phishing Protection page covers phishing and scam threats and describes feed integrations for case creation and takedown workflows. A security team responsible for customer-facing fraud, fake domains, phishing sites, and email abuse may value that combined external view.Source 1, Source 2, Source 3
Netcraft Fraud Detection
A relevant product screenshot was not available in the reviewed evidence.
Palisade
A relevant product screenshot was not available in the reviewed evidence.
- Threat-intelligence and takedown APIs: No takedown API
- Lookalike-domain monitoring and phishing takedown workflows: No takedown workflow
- Security-stack integrations and bi-directional response workflows: No SOC response integrations
That breadth also defines the fit boundary. The public pages do not advertise a dedicated MSP client console, portfolio pricing, hosted authentication records, SPF flattening, or published report-retention terms (checked 2026-08-26). Those unknowns should be questions in a quote and demo, not assumptions about what the platform cannot do. The honest concession is narrow: Netcraft fits an enterprise brand-protection program where DMARC visualization supports a larger fraud-response motion. Palisade fits the team whose central job is to get legitimate senders aligned and domains safely to enforcement with less operator legwork.
Dashboard access vs programmatic access
Netcraft advertises customer APIs and threat feeds, with no MCP server listed
Netcraft advertises Takedown, Classification, and Screenshot APIs for customer workflows, with documentation and onboarding for API users. Its public integrations page says the detailed integrations help page is available to current customers only, so the public site does not expose a REST or GraphQL reference or API plan-tier terms. A separate Netcraft announcement says its Threat API returns machine-readable CSV and JSON incident data to infrastructure providers. Netcraft also advertises Scam Intelligence that uses AI-driven victim emulation in live conversations with scammers to detect and intercept scams. The public integrations inventory lists APIs and named security-platform integrations, but does not advertise an MCP server or an AI-assistant integration (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27)
Netcraft Fraud Detection

Palisade
A relevant product screenshot was not available in the reviewed evidence.
- Documented programmatic API access for threat workflows: REST API published
- MCP server for connecting AI assistants to domain data: MCP server published
- Advertised AI-driven scam detection: Agent drafts and proposes
Palisade publishes an MCP server and a REST API. Its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step; a human approves before anything ships. That gives an operator an API and AI-assistant path for the email-authentication workflow, while keeping DNS and policy changes under human approval.
Reachable from your own AI tools
Palisade's MCP server exposes 42 tools over OAuth, so the assistant your team already uses can read domains, pull the exact records to publish and work the task queue. These are the clients the connection guide walks through.
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- Codex
- Cursor
- Windsurf
- Any MCP client
Still deciding between Netcraft Fraud Detection and Palisade? See what changes with Palisade.
15-day full-product trial. Nothing is charged until it ends.
The agent does the heavy lifting
Sources identified, SPF and DKIM fixes drafted, each policy step proposed. You approve; nothing ships on its own.
Connect your AI with MCP
42 tools over MCP, so your assistant reads your domains and works the queue.
Connect your DNS manager directly
One-time sign-in supports 64 providers without retaining credentials. Optional account connections support Cloudflare, GoDaddy and Route 53. You approve every change.
“We evaluated many DMARC providers before choosing Palisade. The quality of their product, the responsiveness and friendliness of their team and their rapid progress on their product roadmap made it a no-brainer for us to move forward.”
Netcraft Fraud Detection pricing explained (and how Palisade compares)
Netcraft does not publish a plan table or product-specific price for its fraud-detection and DMARC capabilities. Its pricing page asks buyers to request a custom-tailored quote, so the public record supports a quote-based entry point rather than a numeric rate card.
What you'd actually pay
The same five buyer sizes on every comparison, so a shape carries from one page to the next.
1 domain, up to 1,000 emails a month
2 set-up domains, up to 100K emails a month
10 set-up domains, up to 1M emails a month
20 set-up domains, up to 2.5M emails a month
Client domains under management, any volume
Palisade’s figures are derived from its published tiers. Netcraft Fraud Detection pricing or licensing source reference: vendor source citation date 2026-08-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
How Netcraft Fraud Detection prices
- Netcraft's public pricing page is a request form for a custom-tailored quote; it does not list monthly prices or named product tiers (checked 2026-08-26).
- The page highlights threat detection, intelligence, and takedown outcomes, but does not publish a separate price for DMARC Visualization (checked 2026-08-26).
- Netcraft does not publish public trial, report-retention, volume-metering, or MSP pricing terms on the pricing page (checked 2026-08-26).
How Palisade prices
- Palisade publishes flat monthly IT-team plans at $19, $29, $59, $99, and $249 with 20% off on annual billing. Paid tiers allow 2, 3, 6, 10, or 20 set-up domains; adding domains is free and unlimited.
- Palisade's MSP model is priced per client domain with a rate that improves as the portfolio grows and a minimum of 5 client domains. Client domains are not metered by email volume, and the MSP's own domain is included as a free NFR license.
- Palisade includes API access on every plan, keeps unlimited report history on IT-team and MSP plans (Enterprise retention follows custom terms), and offers a 15-day full-product trial. Netcraft's public pages do not publish equivalent terms.
Netcraft Fraud Detection source reference: primary reference citation date 2026-08-26.Palisade source reference: the public pricing page citation date 2026-08-30.Plans and prices may have changed since.
Start a 15-day full-product trial of Palisade. Nothing is charged until it ends.
What each one covers, and where it stops
Published facts only, read from each vendor's own material. Neither column describes a hands-on trial, because we have not run one.
Netcraft combines DMARC visualization with digital-risk protection, domain monitoring, threat intelligence, and takedown workflows. Its DMARC Visualization turns technical reports into charts and insights, maps traffic across domains, validates DNS records, and recommends changes to DMARC and SPF records. The platform suits security or fraud teams that want email-authentication evidence alongside brand-risk signals.
Netcraft extends beyond the mailbox with lookalike-domain monitoring, phishing protection, customer threat APIs, and takedown workflows. Its public integrations list Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Cortex XSOAR and XSIAM, ThreatConnect, and Slack for incident-response activity. The pricing page uses a custom-tailored quote instead of public product tiers or numeric prices.
Palisade is built around an agent that does the DMARC work rather than reporting on it. It identifies every sending source, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step when the evidence supports it.
The agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step, you approve before anything ships.
- Provides DMARC charts and insights for unauthorized-sender analysis
- Provides DNS validation and tailored recommendations for DMARC and SPF records
- Provides customer threat APIs for takedown, classification, and screenshot workflows
- Supports lookalike-domain monitoring and phishing takedown workflows
- Supports SOC tools and response workflows with Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Cortex XSOAR and XSIAM, ThreatConnect, and Slack
- The agent investigates senders and drafts the fix, so the work arrives prepared rather than as a list of findings
- Hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC records, so an approved change can be carried out rather than handed off
- Portfolio workflow for MSPs, with ConnectWise, HaloPSA and Autotask integrations and a free NFR domain
- An MCP server and a REST API, so the same data and workflow are reachable from the AI tools a team already uses
- Does not advertise an agent-led workflow that configures SPF and DKIM and advances policy steps for approval
- Does not advertise hosted DMARC, SPF, or DKIM records
- Does not advertise SPF flattening
- Does not publish report-retention terms
- Does not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations
- Every policy change waits for a human approval, by design: nothing ships on the agent's own authority
- MSP pricing is portfolio-based per client domain, with a minimum of 5 client domains
- Plans are sized by monthly email volume, so a low-domain, high-volume sender lands on a higher tier than domain count alone suggests
- Starts at
- Custom-tailored quote
- Rate card
- Not published
- Trial terms
- Not published
- DMARC-specific MSP pricing
- Not published
- Starts at
- IT plans from $19/mo by email volume; 15-day trial
- Trial
- 15 days, full product
- MSP model
- Portfolio-based per client domain; minimum of 5 client domains
What Palisade customers say
5.0 out of 5 on G2Trusted by over 10,000 domains
“Palisade made it so easy for us to get our blue verified checkmark and achieve our BIMI compliance”
Sources and further reading
Source checks run through 2026-10-14; every entry keeps its individual check date.
- Netcraft DMARC Visualization
Checked 2026-10-13
- Netcraft domain protection
Checked 2026-10-13
- Netcraft Phishing Protection
Checked 2026-10-13
- Netcraft integrations and APIs
Checked 2026-10-14
- Netcraft pricing request
Checked 2026-08-28
- Netcraft Threat API announcement
Checked 2026-08-27
- Netcraft Financial Services threat detection and takedown
Checked 2026-08-27
- Netcraft Internet Infrastructure threat detection and takedown
Checked 2026-08-27
- About Netcraft
Checked 2026-08-27
- Netcraft detection and takedown
Checked 2026-10-13
- Netcraft reporting dashboards
Checked 2026-08-28
- Source
Checked 2026-10-13
- Source
Checked 2026-10-13
Palisade vs Netcraft Fraud Detection: FAQ
What is the main difference between Netcraft Fraud Detection and Palisade?
Palisade is agentic DMARC software. Its agent investigates sending sources, works through SPF and DKIM alignment, and moves domains toward p=reject while your team stays in control. When evaluating Netcraft Fraud Detection, compare that operating model with the workflow in its current product documentation and decide how much work you want your team to carry.
Who should choose Palisade?
Choose Palisade if you want an AI agent to investigate senders, draft fixes, and propose policy steps for human approval, whether you manage one domain or thousands. It is also a natural fit for teams already using Claude, OpenAI, or other AI tools to get operational work done.
Who should choose Netcraft Fraud Detection?
Choose Netcraft Fraud Detection if its current integrations, procurement model, or operating workflow better match your requirements. A more operator-led platform can also fit a team that prefers to review reports and make each change itself.
Does Palisade guarantee a specific time to p=reject?
No responsible DMARC platform should promise the same enforcement timeline for every domain. Timing depends on the number of sending sources, access to DNS and third-party systems, and how quickly each legitimate stream can be aligned. Palisade's agent reduces routine investigation and configuration work while operators retain control over policy decisions.
Switching from Netcraft Fraud Detection takes three steps
- 1
Batch-import your domains
Bring your client domains into Palisade in bulk, or let your ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integration sync them automatically.
- 2
Run both platforms in parallel
Keep both reporting destinations configured during the overlap, verify external-report authorization where required, and confirm reports arrive in both platforms before retiring Netcraft Fraud Detection. Review hosted-record dependencies before changing DNS.
- 3
Cut DNS over on your schedule
Point records at Palisade's hosted infrastructure, then retire the old setup when you're satisfied.
15-day full-product trial. Nothing is charged until it ends.
Source citations on this page run through 2026-10-14; individual claims retain their dates and evidence limitations. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.



