Fraudmarc alternative
Fraudmarc vs Palisade in 2026
How Fraudmarc and Palisade compare on report analysis, SPF management, hosted policies, pricing, and the work required to reach enforcement.
Our verdict: Pick Fraudmarc if you want a focused DMARC reporting and SPF-management product, a full-service option, or the ability to run its Community Edition yourself. Pick Palisade if you want an AI agent to investigate senders, draft the fixes, and propose each policy step for your approval.
Samuel Chenard · CEO & Co-Founder, PalisadeSource checks through 2026-08-261 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
Grok
Palisade
Palisade is free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Which one is right for you?
Best for Teams that prefer to do the hands-on work
Best for MSPs and IT teams responsible for multiple domains
- You want Fraudmarc's report-analysis plans, SPF Compression, or SenderTrace identity intelligence.
- You prefer a hosted dashboard and editor, or you have the technical capacity to operate the open-source Fraudmarc CE stack yourself.
- You want a full-service engagement where Fraudmarc's experts guide the email-authentication journey.
- You want an AI agent to investigate every sender, draft every fix, and propose each policy step while you approve before anything ships.
- You manage a portfolio and want the same agentic operating model across internal domains or client domains.
- You want Smart DNS Deployment and a workflow built around moving domains toward p=reject with human approval at every step.
Free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Where the day-to-day work actually differs
| Feature | Fraudmarc | Palisade |
|---|---|---|
| DMARC analysis | ||
| DMARC aggregate report analysisWhether a product collects and analyzes aggregate DMARC reports.Fraudmarc's Standard plan lists DMARC aggregate report analysis (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Standard plan analysis | Agent analyzes reports |
| DMARC forensic report analysisWhether a product analyzes forensic DMARC reports.Fraudmarc's Standard plan lists DMARC forensic report analysis (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Standard plan analysis | Aggregate reports only |
| Sender identity and source analysisWhether a product identifies the people or teams behind sending sources.Fraudmarc advertises SenderTrace Intelligence for identifying the people and departments behind email sources (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Sender identity analysis | Agent investigates senders |
| Policy management | ||
| Hosted DMARC, SPF, and DKIM policy managementWhether a product hosts and manages DMARC, SPF, and DKIM policies.Fraudmarc describes hosted SPF and DMARC policies, an SPF editor, a DKIM manager, and a DMARC editor (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Hosted policy editors | Hosted email records |
| SPF flattening and DNS-lookup limit handlingWhether SPF records can stay within the 10-DNS-lookup limit.Fraudmarc advertises SPF Compression and Universal SPF for dynamic flattening and overcoming SPF's 10-DNS-lookup limit (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Dynamic SPF handling | Hosted SPF flattening |
| Self-hosted open-source DMARC report analyzerWhether a product offers a self-hosted, open-source DMARC report analyzer.Fraudmarc publishes Fraudmarc Community Edition as open-source DMARC report analysis software, with the repository linked from its site (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Self-hosted source code | Agent analyzes reports |
| Services | ||
| Full-service email-authentication guidanceWhether a provider gives hands-on guidance through email-authentication work.Fraudmarc's Outbox Protection page says its experts guide the full email-authentication journey and work with the customer's team (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Expert-guided service | Agent drafts and proposes |
| Enforcement workflow | ||
| AI agent that investigates every sender and drafts each fix for approvalWhether an agent investigates senders, drafts fixes, and proposes policy steps for approval.Fraudmarc advertises automated DMARC data analysis and SenderTrace identity intelligence, but its public product page does not advertise an AI agent that investigates every sender, drafts each fix, and proposes policy steps for approval (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | No AI agent advertised | Agent drafts and proposes |
| MSP operations | ||
| Native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrationsWhether a product connects directly to the named PSA tools.Fraudmarc's public home, product, pricing, and contact pages do not advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26) | Not advertised | Native PSA integrations |
| Limits and pricing | ||
| Unlimited DMARC report retentionHow long a product keeps DMARC report history.Fraudmarc's published DMARC plans list 30-day history for Standard, 90-day history for Advanced, and one-year history for SenderTrace; unlimited retention is not published (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Up to one year | Unlimited paid-plan retention |
| AI and automation access | ||
| Published API reference for programmatic accessWhether customers can build against a documented public API.Fraudmarc's public sitemap lists product, tool, company, and article pages, but does not advertise a developer portal or public API reference (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | No API reference listed | REST API published |
| MCP server for connecting AI assistants to domain dataWhether an AI assistant can reach the product's data directly.Fraudmarc does not advertise an MCP server or an AI-assistant integration in its public sitemap or on its site navigation (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | No MCP server listed | MCP server published |
| Advertised AI or machine-learning product featuresWhether the vendor advertises AI or machine learning inside the product.Fraudmarc's DMARC reporting page advertises automated data analysis and SenderTrace identity intelligence, but does not advertise AI or machine-learning product features (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | No AI feature advertised | Agent drafts work |
| Scheduled exports, webhooks, or data feedsWhether documented data can leave the product without using the dashboard.Fraudmarc's DMARC reporting page lists report analysis, history, automated data analysis, and SenderTrace identity intelligence, but does not advertise scheduled exports, webhooks, or a data feed (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | No feed or webhook listed | REST API published |
| Deployment ownership | ||
| Deployment location and infrastructure controlWhere the product runs and whether the buyer controls the cloud region.Fraudmarc offers hosted DMARC plans and a self-hosted CE deployment that lets customers choose the AWS region. Palisade publishes a hosted managed platform (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28) Source 2 (2026-08-28) Source 3 (2026-08-28) | Hosted or customer-run AWS | Hosted managed platform |
| Implementation and maintenance ownerWho sets up and maintains the product's operating environment.Fraudmarc says CE requires technical knowledge to implement and maintain and is intended for users who can manage it independently. Palisade documents a hosted product rather than a customer-maintained deployment (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28) Source 2 (2026-08-28) | Customer maintains CE | Palisade hosts the platform |
| Published support route for the operating modelWhere operators go when they need product or deployment help.Fraudmarc directs CE support to its community forum, while Palisade directs customers to support email or the Help button in the app (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28) Source 2 (2026-08-28) | Community forum for CE | Email and in-app support |
Want to compare the workflow yourself? Try Palisade free with one domain and up to 1,000 emails a month.
Palisade 96 vs Fraudmarc 71, and why
Both products are scored on the same eight dimensions the comparison hub uses, so the figures here are the figures there. Four are derived from vendor facts that each carry a source and a checked date. Four are editorial, marked as such below, and each states its reasoning and its source.
Each dimension is out of 10 and the total is the raw sum out of 80, rescaled to 100 — the raw figure is printed beside it so the conversion is checkable rather than a black box. Scored on what each vendor publishes, not on how the product feels in use. Editorial dimensions last reviewed 2026-08-30.
How reachable the product is from your own software and AI tools. 10 = a documented API on every plan plus a published MCP server. 6 = an API, gated to a tier or to a sales conversation. 3 = no programmatic access advertised.
Fraudmarc's current product and pricing page publishes no API or MCP server (checked 2026-08-28). Source (2026-08-28)
Palisade publishes a REST API and a remote MCP server on every plan, making the same domain data and remediation workflows available to connected software. Source (2026-08-30)
How much of the report analysis is done for you. 10 = the platform turns raw report data into a prioritised, actionable queue on its own.
Aggregate and forensic processing plus SenderTrace identity analysis turn report sources into categorized operational evidence. Source (2026-08-28)
Report data is analysed into a prioritised list of sender, SPF, DKIM and DMARC issues, so nobody reads raw XML. Source (2026-07-29)
How much of the work the vendor's own software does. 10 = it identifies the sending sources, drafts the SPF and DKIM fixes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step. 6 = it applies the records for you, but a person decides what to fix and when to advance. 3 = it reports, and every change is yours to make. A vendor whose team does the work rather than its software scores here on the software alone.
Fraudmarc hosts DMARC and SPF records, but its published workflow has the customer edit the policies and move the domain toward reject. Source (2026-08-28)
The agent investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes it needs, and proposes the next policy step; a human approves before deployment. Source (2026-08-30)
10 = full pricing published. 6 = some tiers published, rest quote-gated. 3 = quote only.
Standard DMARC is $21 per domain per month billed annually; Advanced is $4 per user per month and SenderTrace is $12 per user per month. Source (2026-08-28)
Published: free plan, then flat monthly plans by email volume from $19/mo Source (2026-08-30)
10 = hosts the records for you. 6 = partial or add-on. 3 = you manage your own DNS.
Fraudmarc hosts DMARC and SPF records through its editors; its public materials also mention a DKIM manager. Source (2026-08-28)
10 = a genuine free plan. 6 = time-limited trial only. 3 = no free access.
The current product page points to the open-source Community Edition, but does not publish an ongoing free hosted plan. Source (2026-08-28)
Free plan: one domain, up to 1,000 emails/mo, 14-day report history, no credit card, plus a 15-day full-product trial Source (2026-08-30)
10 = a real MSP program with multi-tenant management. 6 = partial. 3 = none.
Partial: Fraudmarc publishes self-service and full-service routes, but no current public MSP commercial programme or tenant terms. Source (2026-08-28)
How much work it takes to get a domain from p=none to p=reject. 10 = the platform (or the vendor's team) gets you there without manual DNS edits.
Hosted DMARC and SPF controls, policy editors, instant setup at three DNS providers, and service assistance support enforcement work. Source (2026-08-28)
The DMARC Agent detects when a domain's authentication and alignment are ready for the next policy stage and proposes the move, but a human still approves and applies it, so it is not fully hands-off. Source (2026-07-29)
Reports and controls vs agent action
Fraudmarc's workflow: reports, editors, and a path to reject
Fraudmarc's public product pages describe a conventional but broad email-authentication workflow. The Standard plan receives aggregate and forensic DMARC reports, while Advanced adds automated data analysis and SenderTrace adds identity intelligence intended to identify the people and departments behind each mail source. Fraudmarc also presents its hosted plans as a place to view reports and edit policy in one place, with an SPF editor, a DKIM manager, a DMARC editor, and SPF history. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
That gives an operator useful evidence and controls, but the public product page does not advertise an AI agent that carries the investigation from sender discovery through drafted fixes and proposed policy steps. Palisade's agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step; your team approves before anything ships. The difference is the work left after the report is understood: Fraudmarc gives the team tools and, through Outbox Protection, expert guidance, while Palisade is designed to take on the routine investigation and configuration work under review. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
- No AI agent advertised
- Agent drafts and proposes
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Hosted policies vs DNS control
SPF is a first-class part of Fraudmarc
Fraudmarc is not only a DMARC dashboard. Its SPF Compression page focuses on the 10-DNS-lookup limit, importing and compressing an existing policy, keeping the flattened policy current as vendors change, and showing inactive vendors that may be safe to remove. The Universal SPF page packages a simpler version of that model: the customer places Universal SPF in front of existing SPF terms, and Fraudmarc advertises automatic updates, dynamic flattening, unlimited email volume and mailboxes, and lookup-limit handling. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
The hosted-record detail matters when planning a migration. Fraudmarc says SPF Compression works when it hosts the SPF record, and its setup guidance asks customers to replace the current SPF and DMARC records with the records Fraudmarc provides. If a customer keeps a TXT DMARC record instead of switching to the hosted CNAME arrangement, Fraudmarc says reports still work but its editors do not. Teams should therefore decide whether they want the convenience of a hosted policy before changing DNS, and keep the current records documented for rollback. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
- Hosted policy editors
- Dynamic SPF handling
- Self-hosted source code
- Hosted email records
- Hosted SPF flattening
- Agent analyzes reports
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Hosted service vs self-hosting
Hosted service or Fraudmarc CE: two different operating models
Fraudmarc also publishes Community Edition, an open-source DMARC report analyzer for advanced users. Fraudmarc's own article says CE is intended for people who can independently manage and maintain DMARC, and points readers to the public GitHub repository for the code. The repository describes aggregate-report processing, a multi-user web application, AWS and AWS GovCloud deployment, and a self-hosted architecture that uses services such as SES, Lambda, RDS, Cognito, and API Gateway. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
CE is a real parity point for a technical team that wants control over deployment and data location, but it changes the buyer's job. A self-hosted edition means the customer owns installation, cloud resources, updates, access, and operational maintenance; the public article points to community-forum support rather than a managed SaaS workflow. Palisade is a hosted product with a different promise: its agent performs the analysis, drafts the authentication work, and proposes the next policy step while the customer remains the approver. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
- Hosted or customer-run AWS
- Customer maintains CE
- Community forum for CE
- Hosted managed platform
- Palisade hosts the platform
- Email and in-app support
Domain pricing vs portfolio fit
Pricing, support, and MSP fit
Fraudmarc's current DMARC analysis page exposes three commercial tracks with different billing units. Standard is priced per domain, while Advanced and SenderTrace are priced per user. The page also makes history a visible tier boundary: 30 days on Standard, 90 days on Advanced, and one year on SenderTrace. That structure can fit a team that wants to buy a defined reporting surface, but it makes a portfolio comparison different from a flat platform fee because the unit changes between plans. Source (2026-08-26)
Fraudmarc does publish a full-service route: Outbox Protection says its experts guide the full email-authentication journey and work with the customer's team. The public site does not advertise a ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integration, nor does it publish a dedicated MSP rate card or multi-tenant operating model. That does not establish that a private arrangement is impossible; it means an MSP should ask directly how client inventory, delegation, reporting, branding, ticketing, and per-client economics would work. Palisade makes those MSP concerns part of its product model, with PSA integrations, portfolio-based per-client-domain pricing, and an agent that can carry routine work across the fleet after approval. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26)
Native PSA integrations
Palisade imports client domains straight from these three. Fraudmarc's own coverage is stated above, from their site.
- ConnectWise PSA
- Autotask
- HaloPSA
- Not advertised
- Native PSA integrations
Dashboard access vs programmatic access
Fraudmarc's public catalog has no published API reference or MCP server
Fraudmarc's public sitemap lists company, product, tool, and article pages. Its site navigation lists SPF Record Check and DMARC Check under Tools, plus Universal SPF, SPF Compression, DMARC reporting, and Outbox Protection under Products & Pricing. Those public materials do not advertise a developer portal, public API reference, MCP server, AI-assistant integration, scheduled export, webhook, or data feed. On the DMARC reporting page, Fraudmarc instead advertises automated data analysis and SenderTrace identity intelligence, not an AI or machine-learning feature (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27)
Palisade publishes an MCP server and REST API. Its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step. A human approves before anything ships.
Reachable from your own AI tools
Palisade's MCP server exposes 30 tools over OAuth, so the assistant your team already uses can read domains, pull the exact records to publish and work the task queue. These are the clients the connection guide walks through.
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Cursor
- Windsurf
- Any MCP client
- No API reference listed
- No MCP server listed
- No AI feature advertised
- REST API published
- MCP server published
- Agent drafts work
Still deciding between Fraudmarc and Palisade? See what changes with Palisade.
1 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
Microsoft 365
Zoho Mail
The agent does the heavy lifting
Sources identified, SPF and DKIM fixes drafted, each policy step proposed. You approve; nothing ships on its own.
Connect your AI with MCP
30 tools over MCP, so your assistant reads your domains and works the queue.
Connect your DNS manager directly
Approved records go into your own zone at your own provider, across 64. No credentials reach us.
“We evaluated many DMARC providers before choosing Palisade. The quality of their product, the responsiveness and friendliness of their team and their rapid progress on their product roadmap made it a no-brainer for us to move forward.”
Fraudmarc pricing explained (and how Palisade compares)
Fraudmarc publishes several ways to buy DMARC analysis, plus separate SPF products and an open-source edition. The prices below are the figures shown on Fraudmarc's public pages when checked:
What you'd actually pay
The same five buyer sizes on every comparison, so a shape carries from one page to the next.
1 domain, up to 1,000 emails a month
Standard: no email-volume limit is published
2 set-up domains, up to 100K emails a month
Standard: no 2-domain package total or email-volume limit is published
10 set-up domains, up to 1M emails a month
Standard: no 10-domain package total or email-volume limit is published
20 set-up domains, up to 2.5M emails a month
Standard: no 20-domain package total or email-volume limit is published
Client domains under management, any volume
No MSP portfolio or per-client-domain rate card is published
Palisade’s figures are derived from its published tiers. Fraudmarc figures read from their pricing page on 2026-08-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
How Fraudmarc prices
- Fraudmarc's DMARC analysis page publishes annual-billing rates, but does not show monthly equivalents for those plans.
- The DMARC page does not publish a free-trial duration. Universal SPF's separate page advertises a 7-day free trial for its Pro comparison, which should not be assumed to apply to every Fraudmarc product.
- Fraudmarc CE is a self-hosted software option rather than a hosted SaaS plan. Its official repository discusses typical AWS resource costs, but those are infrastructure costs and not a Fraudmarc subscription price.
- The public pages do not publish an MSP portfolio or per-client-domain rate card.
How Palisade prices
- Palisade publishes a Free plan for one domain and up to 1,000 emails per month, plus flat monthly IT-team plans priced by email volume from $19/month with 20% annual-billing savings. Paid tiers cap set-up domains at 2, 3, 6, 10, or 20; adding domains is free and unlimited.
- Palisade MSP pricing is quoted per client domain, with a rate that improves as the portfolio grows. The MSP's own domain is included as a free Not-For-Resale license, and client email volume does not meter the platform price.
- Palisade's 15-day full-product trial starts at the first DMARC setup, requires no credit card, and lets teams evaluate the agentic workflow before a paid plan starts.
- The product choice is therefore not only a dashboard-price comparison: Fraudmarc offers domain- or user-priced analysis and a self-hosted route, while Palisade prices the operating model around an agent that does the investigation and drafting work with customer approval.
Fraudmarc pricing read from their public pricing page on 2026-08-26.Plans and prices may have changed since.
Try Palisade free on one domain, or start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
What each one covers, and where it stops
Published facts only, read from each vendor's own material. Neither column describes a hands-on trial, because we have not run one.
Fraudmarc combines DMARC report analysis with hosted SPF, DKIM, and DMARC policy management. Its commercial plans add automated data analysis and SenderTrace identity intelligence, while its SPF products focus on dynamic flattening and the 10-DNS-lookup limit. It is aimed at teams that want a dashboard, policy editors, and specialized SPF controls.
Fraudmarc offers hosted DMARC analysis alongside Community Edition, an open-source option for advanced users who independently manage and maintain DMARC. Standard is priced per domain, while Advanced and SenderTrace are priced per user; Universal SPF is sold separately. Its three commercial tracks list 30 days, 90 days, and one year of report history.
Palisade is built around an agent that does the DMARC work rather than reporting on it. It identifies every sending source, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step when the evidence supports it.
The agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step, you approve before anything ships.
- Provides Standard-plan analysis of aggregate DMARC reports
- Provides Standard-plan analysis of forensic DMARC reports
- Provides SenderTrace identity analysis for email sources
- Provides hosted editors for DMARC, SPF, and DKIM policies
- Provides SPF Compression and Universal SPF for dynamic flattening and lookup-limit handling
- The agent investigates senders and drafts the fix, so the work arrives prepared rather than as a list of findings
- Hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC on redundant managed DNS, so an approved change can be carried out rather than handed off
- Portfolio workflow for MSPs, with ConnectWise, HaloPSA and Autotask integrations and a free NFR domain
- An MCP server and a REST API, so the same data and workflow are reachable from the AI tools a team already uses
- Does not advertise an AI agent that investigates every sender, drafts each fix, and proposes policy steps for approval
- Does not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations
- Does not publish unlimited DMARC report retention
- Does not advertise a public API reference
- Does not advertise an MCP server or AI-assistant integration
- Every policy change waits for a human approval, by design: nothing ships on the agent's own authority
- MSP pricing is quoted per client domain rather than published as a rate card
- Plans are sized by monthly email volume, so a low-domain, high-volume sender lands on a higher tier than domain count alone suggests
- Starts at
- $21 per domain/month billed annually
- Report history
- 30 days to one year
- CE license
- No license price published
- Trial duration
- Not published
- MSP model
- Not published
- Starts at
- Free, then $19/mo
- Free tier
- 1 domain, up to 1,000 emails/month
- Trial
- 15 days, full product, no credit card
- MSP model
- Quoted per client domain, portfolio-based
“Palisade made it so easy for us to get our blue verified checkmark and achieve our BIMI compliance”
Sources and further reading
Source checks run through 2026-08-26; every entry keeps its individual check date.
- Fraudmarc home and navigation: AI and automation review
Checked 2026-08-27
- Fraudmarc DMARC reporting: AI and automation review
Checked 2026-08-27
- SPF Compression
Checked 2026-08-26
- Universal SPF and pricing
Checked 2026-08-26
- Hosted-plan setup explanation
Checked 2026-08-26
- Fraudmarc CE article
Checked 2026-08-26
- Fraudmarc CE repository
Checked 2026-08-26
- Fraudmarc Outbox Protection: AI and automation review
Checked 2026-08-27
- Fraudmarc robots directives
Checked 2026-08-27
- Fraudmarc public sitemap
Checked 2026-08-27
Palisade vs Fraudmarc: FAQ
What is the main difference between Fraudmarc and Palisade?
Palisade is agentic DMARC software. Its agent investigates sending sources, works through SPF and DKIM alignment, and moves domains toward p=reject while your team stays in control. When evaluating Fraudmarc, compare that operating model with the workflow in its current product documentation and decide how much work you want your team to carry.
Who should choose Palisade?
Choose Palisade if you want an AI agent to carry routine DMARC work through enforcement, whether you manage one domain or thousands. It is also a natural fit for teams already using Claude, OpenAI, or other AI tools to get operational work done.
Who should choose Fraudmarc?
Choose Fraudmarc if its current integrations, procurement model, or operating workflow better match your requirements. A more operator-led platform can also fit a team that prefers to review reports and make each change itself.
Does Palisade guarantee a specific time to p=reject?
No responsible DMARC platform should promise the same enforcement timeline for every domain. Timing depends on the number of sending sources, access to DNS and third-party systems, and how quickly each legitimate stream can be aligned. Palisade's agent reduces routine investigation and configuration work while operators retain control over policy decisions.
Switching from Fraudmarc takes three steps
- 1
Batch-import your domains
Bring your client domains into Palisade in bulk, or let your ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integration sync them automatically.
- 2
Run both platforms in parallel
DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so Palisade and Fraudmarc receive the same reports during the overlap window. Nothing breaks while you compare.
- 3
Cut DNS over on your schedule
Point records at Palisade's hosted infrastructure (redundant managed DNS), then retire the old setup when you're satisfied.
Our onboarding team handles the technical transition with you.
Competitor information on this page was last reviewed against public sources on 2026-08-26. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.