Everest alternative
Everest vs Palisade in 2026
Everest is Validity's inbox-placement and deliverability product, now sold inside Validity Engage: inbox placement testing, Sender Score reputation, blocklist monitoring, and DMARC reporting in one deliverability suite. Palisade is DMARC-native and agentic, with an agent that investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes every policy step for approval.
Our verdict: Pick Everest if deliverability is the job and DMARC is one part of it: seed-list placement by mailbox provider, reputation scoring, and pre-send checks matter more to you than who carries the authentication work. Pick Palisade if the job is getting domains to p=reject and keeping them there, and you would rather approve an agent's drafted fixes than staff the investigation yourself.
Samuel Chenard · CEO & Co-Founder, PalisadeSource checks through 2026-08-261 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
Grok
Palisade
Palisade is free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Which one is right for you?
Best for Email teams wanting inbox-placement testing
Best for MSPs and IT teams responsible for multiple domains
- Your team owns marketing send quality, and inbox placement, Sender Score, and blocklist monitoring are the daily questions.
- You already use Validity, or one of the ESPs named in its public feature matrix, and want DMARC reporting alongside the deliverability tooling.
- A quote-based enterprise purchase suits you: Validity prices on volume, domains, IPs, team size, and feature set rather than a published rate card.
- Report retention of 30 days to 18 months by tier is enough history for how you work.
- You want the agent to investigate every sender, draft the SPF and DKIM changes, and propose each policy step, with your team approving before anything ships.
- You run an MSP or manage client domains and need multi-tenant workflows with native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations, which Everest does not list.
- You want authentication records hosted on redundant managed DNS rather than hand-maintained in each domain's zone.
- You want published self-serve pricing and unlimited retention on paid plans instead of a quote and a tiered retention window.
Free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Where the day-to-day work actually differs
| Feature | Everest | Palisade |
|---|---|---|
| Enforcement | ||
| AI agent that investigates senders, drafts authentication fixes, and proposes policy stepsWhether an agent investigates senders, drafts fixes, and proposes policy steps for approval.Validity's current Everest/Engage capability page advertises monitoring, checks, and guidance, but does not advertise an agent that investigates every sender, drafts SPF/DKIM fixes, and proposes each DMARC policy step (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | No DMARC-remediation agent | Agent drafts and proposes |
| DMARC report monitoring and analyticsWhether aggregate DMARC reports are analyzed to identify authentication issues.Validity's DMARC page specifically recommends using Everest to automate DMARC reporting and identify issues. Source (2026-08-26) | Automated report analysis | Agent analyzes reports |
| Deliverability | ||
| Inbox placement testing by mailbox providerWhether inbox placement can be tested across mailbox providers.The current Validity capability page lists real-time placement testing and provider-specific placement insights. Source (2026-08-26) | Live provider placement | Placement by provider |
| Sender reputation monitoringWhether sender reputation can be monitored across sending IPs and domains.The current Validity capability page lists Sender Score monitoring across IPs and domains. Source (2026-08-26) | IP/domain score tracking | Supported |
| Authentication | ||
| SPF, DKIM, and DMARC authentication monitoringWhether SPF, DKIM, and DMARC configuration and alignment can be monitored.Validity says its authentication monitoring verifies configuration and alignment across sending domains, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. Source (2026-08-26) | Alignment configuration checks | Agent reviews authentication |
| Deliverability | ||
| Blocklist monitoringWhether blocklists that affect sending reputation can be monitored.Blocklist monitoring is listed as an included capability on the current Validity product page. Source (2026-08-26) | Listed capability | Supported |
| Integrations | ||
| API access and ESP integrationsWhether the product offers API access and connections to email service providers.Validity's public Everest feature matrix lists API access and integrations for Amazon SES, Mailgun, MailerQ, Maropost, SendGrid, SparkPost, and Salesforce Marketing Cloud. Source (2026-08-26) | API plus ESP links | API on every plan |
| MSP operations | ||
| Native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrationsWhether the named PSA systems connect directly to client-domain workflows.Everest's public integrations route redirects to the Validity homepage, and its public feature matrix names ESP integrations but does not advertise ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | No PSA integrations listed | Native PSA integrations |
| Limits and metering | ||
| Unlimited report retention on paid plansWhether report history remains available without time limits on paid plans.Validity's public Everest feature matrix lists 30 days for Essentials, 90 days for Professional, and 18 months for Enterprise rather than unlimited retention on every plan (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | No unlimited retention | Unlimited paid retention |
| Hosted records and DNS | ||
| Hosted SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and BIMI records on redundant managed DNSWhether authentication records can be hosted on redundant managed DNS.Validity's current product, DMARC, and integrations pages describe monitoring and reporting, but do not advertise hosted authentication records or redundant managed DNS (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26) | No hosted records listed | Hosted on managed DNS |
| AI and automation access | ||
| Documented programmatic access outside the dashboardWhether customers can send or retrieve product data through documented software endpoints.Validity's public Everest Developer Guide documents posting JSON event data to the Everest Universal Endpoint. Its August 2026 Engage Terms say API access is available to select qualified customers only. Validity Academy lists an Everest API course, but its course content requires enrollment (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27) | Qualified API access | REST API published |
| MCP integration for AI assistant accessWhether the vendor's public materials list Model Context Protocol access for an AI assistant.Validity's August 2026 Engage Terms list MCP, Slack, and Teams integrations among the Engage Experience capabilities. The terms include Deliverability & Analytics, also called Everest, in the Engage subscription (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | MCP integration listed | MCP server published |
| Advertised AI assistance for deliverability workWhether the vendor advertises AI or agentic functions that analyze or prepare email work.Validity's August 2026 Engage Terms list agentic automation and AI capabilities including deliverability issue detection, prioritized remediation guidance, and HTML email-fix generation (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | AI capabilities listed | Agent drafts fixes |
| Data exchange outside the dashboardWhether public materials describe an endpoint, webhook, export, or data feed that works without the dashboard.Validity's publicly accessible Everest feature matrix lists webhook alerts for Enterprise, while a public Everest engagement guide says its webhook can be used with ESPs (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | Enterprise webhooks listed | REST API published |
Want to compare the workflow yourself? Try Palisade free with one domain and up to 1,000 emails a month.
Palisade 96 vs Everest 33, and why
Both products are scored on the same eight dimensions the comparison hub uses, so the figures here are the figures there. Four are derived from vendor facts that each carry a source and a checked date. Four are editorial, marked as such below, and each states its reasoning and its source.
Each dimension is out of 10 and the total is the raw sum out of 80, rescaled to 100 — the raw figure is printed beside it so the conversion is checkable rather than a black box. Scored on what each vendor publishes, not on how the product feels in use. Editorial dimensions last reviewed 2026-08-30.
How reachable the product is from your own software and AI tools. 10 = a documented API on every plan plus a published MCP server. 6 = an API, gated to a tier or to a sales conversation. 3 = no programmatic access advertised.
The Everest feature matrix lists API access in every edition; Validity Engage separately packages Everest with an MCP integration rather than a standalone Everest MCP entitlement. Source (2026-08-30)
Palisade publishes a REST API and a remote MCP server on every plan, making the same domain data and remediation workflows available to connected software. Source (2026-08-30)
How much of the report analysis is done for you. 10 = the platform turns raw report data into a prioritised, actionable queue on its own.
The product correlates authentication, sender, reputation, placement, and deliverability signals and alerts teams to vulnerabilities. Source (2026-08-28)
Report data is analysed into a prioritised list of sender, SPF, DKIM and DMARC issues, so nobody reads raw XML. Source (2026-07-29)
How much of the work the vendor's own software does. 10 = it identifies the sending sources, drafts the SPF and DKIM fixes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step. 6 = it applies the records for you, but a person decides what to fix and when to advance. 3 = it reports, and every change is yours to make. A vendor whose team does the work rather than its software scores here on the software alone.
Everest automates DMARC reporting and identifies issues, but Validity describes customers using the results to resolve the issues themselves. Source (2026-08-28)
The agent investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes it needs, and proposes the next policy step; a human approves before deployment. Source (2026-08-30)
10 = full pricing published. 6 = some tiers published, rest quote-gated. 3 = quote only.
Contracted Everest pricing is quote-based; no complete public numeric rate card was verified. Source (2026-08-28)
Published: free plan, then flat monthly plans by email volume from $19/mo Source (2026-08-30)
10 = hosts the records for you. 6 = partial or add-on. 3 = you manage your own DNS.
Everest monitors SPF, DKIM, and DMARC compliance but does not publish hosted authentication records. Source (2026-08-28)
10 = a genuine free plan. 6 = time-limited trial only. 3 = no free access.
No ongoing free Everest tier is published; Validity terms cover evaluation trials. Source (2026-08-28)
Free plan: one domain, up to 1,000 emails/mo, 14-day report history, no credit card, plus a 15-day full-product trial Source (2026-08-30)
10 = a real MSP program with multi-tenant management. 6 = partial. 3 = none.
No public Everest-specific MSP reseller programme is published in the reviewed product material. Source (2026-08-28)
How much work it takes to get a domain from p=none to p=reject. 10 = the platform (or the vendor's team) gets you there without manual DNS edits.
Everest provides monitoring and expert guidance, but it does not publish hosted records or direct DNS execution for the DMARC rollout. Source (2026-08-28)
The DMARC Agent detects when a domain's authentication and alignment are ready for the next policy stage and proposes the move, but a human still approves and applies it, so it is not fully hands-off. Source (2026-07-29)
Deliverability visibility vs DNS remediation
Everest's current shape: deliverability visibility first
Everest is now presented through Validity's broader Engage platform. The legacy Everest URL redirects to a capability page centered on inbox placement and deliverability: real-time placement testing, Sender Score monitoring, authentication checks, blocklist monitoring, provider-specific signals, and a pre-send deliverability check. That is a coherent fit for an email marketing team that wants to understand where campaigns land and why. Source (2026-08-26)
Validity also maintains a DMARC education page that points readers to Everest for automated DMARC reporting. The product story is therefore broader than a DMARC-only dashboard: DMARC and authentication evidence sit alongside inbox placement, sender reputation, blocklists, and campaign readiness. If the buying question is overall campaign deliverability, that breadth is relevant; if the question is who will carry DNS remediation through enforcement, it needs a separate check. Source (2026-08-26)
- Live provider placement
- IP/domain score tracking
- Listed capability
- Placement by provider
- Supported
- Supported
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Monitoring and testing vs approved remediation
Monitoring and testing versus agent-led remediation
Everest's public materials put the operator in front of the evidence. The current page describes checking placement by provider, tracking reputation across IPs and domains, verifying authentication alignment, watching blocklists, and repeating the test after an issue is handled. Its DMARC reference explains the role of p=none, p=quarantine, and p=reject, while recommending Everest or another reporting tool for aggregate reports. Those are useful inputs to an enforcement project, but the reviewed pages do not describe an Everest agent that investigates every sender, drafts each SPF or DKIM fix, and proposes policy steps for approval. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26)
Palisade is built around that missing operating layer. Its agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step — you approve before anything ships. It can turn report evidence into authentication work and a controlled path toward p=reject, while the customer remains the approver. Everest can be the better fit when your deliverability team wants a rich measurement and testing surface; Palisade is the better fit when the platform should prepare the work instead of leaving an operator to translate every signal into a DNS task.
- No DMARC-remediation agent
- Automated report analysis
- Agent drafts and proposes
- Agent analyzes reports
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
ESP coverage vs MSP workflows
Integrations: useful ESP coverage, different MSP question
Validity's public Everest feature matrix lists API access, aggregate reporting views, and ESP integrations for Amazon SES, Mailgun, MailerQ, Maropost, SendGrid, SparkPost, and Salesforce Marketing Cloud. It also describes edition-specific alert channels, from in-app alerts to email, text, webhooks, Slack, PagerDuty, and Teams. The matrix is an older public document, so a buyer should confirm which entries are still included in the current Engage packaging, but it gives an email marketing team concrete integration names to take into a sales conversation. Source (2026-08-26)
That is not the same question as MSP operations. The legacy integrations URL redirects to the Validity homepage, and no current first-party page reviewed here advertises ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask. Palisade publishes those three native PSA integrations for MSP accounts, plus client-domain import and a free API. An MSP should therefore verify ticket creation, multi-tenant boundaries, reporting handoff, and commercial treatment directly before assuming Everest's ESP coverage maps to a PSA workflow. Source (2026-08-26)
Native PSA integrations
Palisade imports client domains straight from these three. Everest's own coverage is stated above, from their site.
- ConnectWise PSA
- Autotask
- HaloPSA
- No PSA integrations listed
- Native PSA integrations
Quote-led terms vs public pricing
Pricing and fit when the rate card is private
Everest's commercial path is currently quote-based. The old pricing route redirects to a contact-sales form rather than exposing an Everest table, and Validity's current FAQ says price depends on the email program's volume, domains and IPs, team size, and selected features. The public feature matrix names Essentials, Professional, and Enterprise editions and gives different history windows and alert channels, but it does not supply a current price for any of them. Ask for retention, test volume, users, IP and domain allowances, add-ons, support, and renewal terms in the quote. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26)
Palisade makes the self-serve comparison easier to model: a free single-domain plan, published flat monthly IT-team tiers from $19/month, and MSP pricing based on client domains rather than client email volume. The two products answer different procurement questions. Everest fits a team willing to scope a broader deliverability suite through sales; Palisade fits an IT team or MSP that wants public starting rates and an agentic workflow with approval still in human hands.
What each side charges
Three points on each published range: the cheapest plan, one in the middle, and the top of what the vendor publishes. Every plan on both sides is in the pricing section further down.
- Everest / Validity EngageCustom - contact sales
Current Validity pages describe real-time placement testing, reputation monitoring, authentication checks, blocklist monitoring, provider-specific insights, and pre-send deliverability checks; the public Everest pricing route does not show a standalone rate card.
- Free$0
1 domain, your own, capped at 1,000 emails/mo
- IT teams: up to 500,000 emails/mo$59/mo ($47/mo billed annually)
Same product: 6 set-up domains, pick the tier that matches your sending
- Enterprise (more than 2.5M / month)Custom
Custom volume, retention, and terms
- No unlimited retention
- Unlimited paid retention
Dashboard access vs programmatic access
Validity Engage lists MCP integrations and agentic AI, while Everest API access is qualification-gated
Validity's August 2026 Engage Terms include Deliverability & Analytics, also called Everest, in an Engage subscription, although individual features may need prerequisites, configuration, or credits. The terms say API access is available to select qualified customers only and list MCP, Slack, and Teams integrations. They also list agentic automation and AI capabilities for deliverability issue detection, prioritized remediation guidance, and HTML email-fix generation. Separately, a public Everest Developer Guide documents posting JSON event data to a Universal Endpoint; the Academy course called Everest API requires enrollment, so its course content was not available to inspect. Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27)
Palisade publishes an MCP server and a REST API. Its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step. A human approves before anything ships.
Reachable from your own AI tools
Palisade's MCP server exposes 30 tools over OAuth, so the assistant your team already uses can read domains, pull the exact records to publish and work the task queue. These are the clients the connection guide walks through.
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Cursor
- Windsurf
- Any MCP client
- Qualified API access
- MCP integration listed
- AI capabilities listed
- REST API published
- MCP server published
- Agent drafts fixes
Still deciding between Everest and Palisade? See what changes with Palisade.
1 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
Microsoft 365
Zoho Mail
The agent does the heavy lifting
Sources identified, SPF and DKIM fixes drafted, each policy step proposed. You approve; nothing ships on its own.
Connect your AI with MCP
30 tools over MCP, so your assistant reads your domains and works the queue.
Connect your DNS manager directly
Approved records go into your own zone at your own provider, across 64. No credentials reach us.
“We evaluated many DMARC providers before choosing Palisade. The quality of their product, the responsiveness and friendliness of their team and their rapid progress on their product roadmap made it a no-brainer for us to move forward.”
Everest pricing explained (and how Palisade compares)
Everest does not currently present a public standalone rate card. The legacy Everest pricing route redirects to a Validity/Litmus contact-sales form, while Validity's current inbox-placement page says pricing varies with email volume, domains and IP addresses, team size, and the features required. That makes the commercial comparison a quote exercise rather than a published plan table.
What you'd actually pay
The same five buyer sizes on every comparison, so a shape carries from one page to the next.
1 domain, up to 1,000 emails a month
2 set-up domains, up to 100K emails a month
10 set-up domains, up to 1M emails a month
20 set-up domains, up to 2.5M emails a month
Client domains under management, any volume
Palisade’s figures are derived from its published tiers. Everest figures read from their pricing page on 2026-08-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
How Everest prices
- The legacy Everest pricing URL redirected to https://www.litmus.com/contact-sales when checked on 2026-08-26; it did not display Everest plan names or prices.
- Validity's current product FAQ says inbox-placement software pricing varies by email volume, domains and IP addresses, required features, and team size.
- The public Everest feature matrix describes Essentials, Professional, and Enterprise editions, but it does not publish prices. Its listed limits include different history windows and alert channels by edition.
- A free trial length, self-serve signup flow, overage policy, and MSP-specific price model were not published on the pages checked.
How Palisade prices
- Palisade publishes a Free plan for one domain and up to 1,000 emails per month, then flat monthly IT-team plans sized by email volume from $19/month, with 20% off on annual billing and 2 to 20 set-up domains by tier. Adding domains is free and unlimited; only setup counts against the tier.
- Palisade's MSP model is quoted per client domain, with a rate that improves as the portfolio grows. The MSP's own domain is included as a free Not-For-Resale license, and client domains are not metered by email volume.
- Palisade keeps report retention unlimited on paid plans, includes API access on every plan, and offers a 15-day full-product trial without requiring a card at signup or during the trial.
- Everest buyers should request the final volume, domain, IP, retention, user, integration, support, and add-on terms in writing because the current public route does not expose a comparable rate table.
Everest pricing read from their public pricing page on 2026-08-26.Plans and prices may have changed since.
Try Palisade free on one domain, or start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
What each one covers, and where it stops
Published facts only, read from each vendor's own material. Neither column describes a hands-on trial, because we have not run one.
Everest is Validity's inbox-placement and deliverability product, sold inside Validity Engage, for email marketing teams that want to understand where campaigns land and why. It combines inbox placement testing, Sender Score reputation monitoring, authentication checks, blocklist monitoring, provider-specific signals, pre-send deliverability checks, and automated DMARC reporting in a broader deliverability suite.
Everest sells through a quote-based path rather than a published standalone rate card. Validity says pricing varies by email volume, domains and IP addresses, team size, and required features. The public feature matrix names Essentials, Professional, and Enterprise editions with different history windows and alert channels.
Palisade is built around an agent that does the DMARC work rather than reporting on it. It identifies every sending source, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step when the evidence supports it.
The agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step, you approve before anything ships.
- Provides automated DMARC report analysis
- Provides live inbox-placement testing by mailbox provider
- Provides Sender Score tracking across IPs and domains
- Provides SPF, DKIM, and DMARC configuration and alignment checks
- Provides blocklist monitoring
- The agent investigates senders and drafts the fix, so the work arrives prepared rather than as a list of findings
- Hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC on redundant managed DNS, so an approved change can be carried out rather than handed off
- Portfolio workflow for MSPs, with ConnectWise, HaloPSA and Autotask integrations and a free NFR domain
- An MCP server and a REST API, so the same data and workflow are reachable from the AI tools a team already uses
- Does not advertise an agent that investigates senders, drafts authentication fixes, and proposes policy steps
- Does not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations
- Does not advertise unlimited report retention on every plan
- Does not advertise hosted SPF, DKIM, DMARC, or BIMI records on redundant managed DNS
- Every policy change waits for a human approval, by design: nothing ships on the agent's own authority
- MSP pricing is quoted per client domain rather than published as a rate card
- Plans are sized by monthly email volume, so a low-domain, high-volume sender lands on a higher tier than domain count alone suggests
- Starts at
- Custom - contact sales
- Published pricing
- Not published
- Retention
- 30 days to 18 months by edition
- Free trial
- Not published
- MSP model
- Not published
- Starts at
- Free, then $19/mo
- Free tier
- 1 domain, up to 1,000 emails/month
- Trial
- 15 days, full product, no credit card
- MSP model
- Quoted per client domain, portfolio-based
“Palisade made it so easy for us to get our blue verified checkmark and achieve our BIMI compliance”
Sources and further reading
Source checks run through 2026-08-26; every entry keeps its individual check date.
- Validity Engage inbox placement and deliverability capability
Checked 2026-08-26
- Validity DMARC overview mentioning Everest reporting
Checked 2026-08-26
- Everest pricing route and redirect destination
Checked 2026-08-26
- Everest integrations route and redirect destination
Checked 2026-08-26
- Validity Everest editions and feature matrix
Checked 2026-08-26
- Validity Sender Certification DMARC requirements
Checked 2026-08-26
- Validity Engage terms: AI and automation access review
Checked 2026-08-27
- Everest Universal Endpoint developer guide: AI and automation access review
Checked 2026-08-27
- Validity Academy Everest API course access check
Checked 2026-08-27
- Validity Everest feature matrix: AI and automation access review
Checked 2026-08-27
- Everest Engagement guide: AI and automation access review
Checked 2026-08-27
Palisade vs Everest: FAQ
What is the main difference between Everest and Palisade?
Palisade is agentic DMARC software. Its agent investigates sending sources, works through SPF and DKIM alignment, and moves domains toward p=reject while your team stays in control. When evaluating Everest, compare that operating model with the workflow in its current product documentation and decide how much work you want your team to carry.
Who should choose Palisade?
Choose Palisade if you want an AI agent to carry routine DMARC work through enforcement, whether you manage one domain or thousands. It is also a natural fit for teams already using Claude, OpenAI, or other AI tools to get operational work done.
Who should choose Everest?
Choose Everest if its current integrations, procurement model, or operating workflow better match your requirements. A more operator-led platform can also fit a team that prefers to review reports and make each change itself.
Does Palisade guarantee a specific time to p=reject?
No responsible DMARC platform should promise the same enforcement timeline for every domain. Timing depends on the number of sending sources, access to DNS and third-party systems, and how quickly each legitimate stream can be aligned. Palisade's agent reduces routine investigation and configuration work while operators retain control over policy decisions.
Switching from Everest takes three steps
- 1
Batch-import your domains
Bring your client domains into Palisade in bulk, or let your ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integration sync them automatically.
- 2
Run both platforms in parallel
DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so Palisade and Everest receive the same reports during the overlap window. Nothing breaks while you compare.
- 3
Cut DNS over on your schedule
Point records at Palisade's hosted infrastructure (redundant managed DNS), then retire the old setup when you're satisfied.
Our onboarding team handles the technical transition with you.
Competitor information on this page was last reviewed against public sources on 2026-08-26. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.