DMARCEye alternative
DMARCEye vs Palisade in 2026
DMARCEye turns DMARC reports into dashboards, recommendations, AI chat, and agency workflows. Palisade adds an agentic operating model that investigates senders, drafts authentication fixes, and proposes each policy step for your approval.
Our verdict: Pick DMARCEye if you want a polished DMARC monitoring platform with built-in AI analysis, MCP access, and a documented agency account. Pick Palisade if you want the agent to carry investigation and configuration work toward p=reject while your team remains the approval gate.
Samuel Chenard · CEO & Co-Founder, PalisadeSource checks through 2026-08-261 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
Grok
Palisade
Palisade is free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Which one is right for you?
Best for Teams that want dashboards, recommendations, and in-app AI support
Best for MSPs and IT teams responsible for multiple domains
- You want dashboards, sender drill-downs, recommendations, and an in-app AI assistant to help your team interpret DMARC data.
- Your agency needs multi-tenant accounts, isolated client sub-accounts, centralized billing, and MCP access to portfolio data.
- Your plan can work within DMARCeye's domain-slot and email-volume limits, or you are ready to discuss its custom Agency plan.
- You want one-click DNS setup to selected providers and prefer to make the final authentication and policy changes yourself.
- You want an AI agent to investigate every sender, draft SPF and DKIM fixes, and propose each policy step toward p=reject.
- You want your team to approve every change before it ships while the agent carries the analysis and configuration work.
- You manage an MSP portfolio and want client-domain pricing without metering client email volume, plus native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrations.
- You need hosted records on redundant managed DNS or Smart DNS Deployment through your DNS provider as two clearly separated deployment paths.
Free for one domain, up to 1,000 emails a month. Paid IT-team plans are sized by email volume. Start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
Where the day-to-day work actually differs
| Feature | DMARCEye | Palisade |
|---|---|---|
| Investigation and enforcement | ||
| AI agent that investigates senders, drafts authentication fixes, and proposes each step toward p=rejectWhether a product investigates senders, prepares fixes, and advances policy readiness for approval.DMARCEye advertises AI analysis, recommendations, in-app chat, and policy management, but does not advertise an agent that carries each enforcement step to p=reject (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | No agent-led enforcement | Agent drafts and proposes |
| DMARC report monitoring with sender and authentication visibilityWhether reports show sending sources and authentication results.DMARCEye documents aggregate-report dashboards with domain, sender, and IP drill-downs plus authentication results (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Sender and IP drill-downs | Agent analyzes reports |
| AI summaries and prioritized recommendations from report dataWhether report data is turned into clear, prioritized next steps.DMARCEye says AI Security Analysis reads reports and places plain-language summaries and prioritized recommendations on the dashboard (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Dashboard summaries and recommendations | Agent analyzes reports |
| AI access | ||
| In-app AI chat and MCP access to live DMARC dataWhether AI assistants can answer questions from current DMARC data.DMARCEye documents Bart, its in-app AI chat, and a native MCP server that can be connected to Claude, ChatGPT, or another compatible assistant (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Chat plus MCP access | Agent investigates senders |
| DNS and policy | ||
| DMARC policy management and one-click DNS setup to selected providersWhether a product can manage DMARC policy and publish prepared DNS records.DMARCEye advertises policy management and says a ready record can be published with one-click DNS setup to selected providers (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Policy controls and DNS publishing | Agent drafts approved changes |
| SPF, DKIM, and DMARC setup guidance and status checksWhether setup support covers SPF, DKIM, and DMARC plus their current status.DMARCEye's documentation describes guided configuration of DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records, then reports on which mechanisms are active or missing (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Guided setup and status | Agent drafts configuration fixes |
| Monitoring | ||
| Smart alerts and email reports for authentication changesWhether alerting can surface authentication changes on selected conditions.DMARCEye advertises custom thresholds and timeframes for smart alerts, plus email reports on its pricing page (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Custom thresholds and emails | Agent flags new tickets |
| Sending sources identified down to IP addressWhether sender locations and infrastructure can be reviewed at IP level.DMARCEye says its infrastructure overview identifies senders down to IP address and plots source locations on a geolocation map (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | IP-level map and overview | Agent investigates senders |
| Plan limits | ||
| Unlimited report retention on every paid planHow much DMARC history every plan keeps.DMARCEye lists 30 days of history on Free, one year on Scale, and unlimited history only on Agency; it does not advertise unlimited retention on every plan (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Not on every plan | Unlimited on paid plans |
| API access on every planWhether all plans include programmatic access to DMARC data.DMARCEye lists API access as an Agency inclusion and does not list it for Free or Scale (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Not on every plan | API on every plan |
| MSP operations | ||
| Multi-tenant client management with isolated sub-accountsWhether users can manage client domains in separate accounts.DMARCEye's Agency plan describes isolated client environments, per-client access, centralized billing, and a unified view across the portfolio (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) | Isolated agency sub-accounts | Multi-tenant client management |
| White-label client platform or reportsWhether a client workspace or report can use the provider's brand.DMARCEye says white-labeling with custom logo support is available; PDF report exports are described as planned (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Custom-logo branding | Before-and-after white-label reports |
| Native ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and Autotask integrationsWhether the named PSA systems have native integrations.DMARCEye's public agency and product pages document MCP and integrations on request but do not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations (checked 2026-08-26). Source (2026-08-26) | Named PSA tools not advertised | Native PSA integrations |
| AI and automation access | ||
| Documented REST API for programmatic domain and report accessWhether software can retrieve report data or manage domains through a published API reference.DMARCEye publishes REST API documentation for authenticated domain and report endpoints. Its pricing page lists API access on Agency, but not Free or Scale (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | Agency REST API | REST API published |
| MCP server for connecting AI assistants to DMARC dataWhether an AI assistant can reach the product's data directly.DMARCEye advertises a native MCP server for connecting Claude, ChatGPT, or another MCP-compatible assistant to its data. Its pricing page lists the MCP server on Scale and Agency, not Free (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | Paid-plan MCP server | MCP server published |
| Built-in AI analysis and in-app report chatWhether the product advertises AI that interprets DMARC findings inside the application.DMARCEye advertises AI Security Analysis for plain-language report summaries and prioritized recommendations, plus Bart, its in-app AI chat for questions about report data (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) | AI analysis and chat | No in-app chat; agent drafts fixes |
| Scheduled email reports outside the dashboardWhether DMARC findings can be delivered without opening the product interface.DMARCEye documents email recipients for alerts and daily or weekly summary reports. Its pricing page lists email reports on Scale and Agency, not Free (checked 2026-08-27). Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) | Scheduled email reports | REST API published |
Want to compare the workflow yourself? Try Palisade free with one domain and up to 1,000 emails a month.
Palisade 96 vs DMARCEye 73, and why
Both products are scored on the same eight dimensions the comparison hub uses, so the figures here are the figures there. Four are derived from vendor facts that each carry a source and a checked date. Four are editorial, marked as such below, and each states its reasoning and its source.
Each dimension is out of 10 and the total is the raw sum out of 80, rescaled to 100 — the raw figure is printed beside it so the conversion is checkable rather than a black box. Scored on what each vendor publishes, not on how the product feels in use. Editorial dimensions last reviewed 2026-08-30.
How reachable the product is from your own software and AI tools. 10 = a documented API on every plan plus a published MCP server. 6 = an API, gated to a tier or to a sales conversation. 3 = no programmatic access advertised.
DMARCEye documents an API on Agency and a native MCP server on Scale and Agency, while Free includes neither. Source (2026-08-28)
Palisade publishes a REST API and a remote MCP server on every plan, making the same domain data and remediation workflows available to connected software. Source (2026-08-30)
How much of the report analysis is done for you. 10 = the platform turns raw report data into a prioritised, actionable queue on its own.
Automatic AI analysis, in-app chat, smart alerts, portfolio views, and MCP access surface report findings across individual and client domains. Source (2026-08-28)
Report data is analysed into a prioritised list of sender, SPF, DKIM and DMARC issues, so nobody reads raw XML. Source (2026-07-29)
How much of the work the vendor's own software does. 10 = it identifies the sending sources, drafts the SPF and DKIM fixes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step. 6 = it applies the records for you, but a person decides what to fix and when to advance. 3 = it reports, and every change is yours to make. A vendor whose team does the work rather than its software scores here on the software alone.
DMARCEye generates a DMARC record and can publish it to Cloudflare, while the customer chooses the policy and authorizes the change. Source (2026-08-28)
The agent investigates each sender, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes it needs, and proposes the next policy step; a human approves before deployment. Source (2026-08-30)
10 = full pricing published. 6 = some tiers published, rest quote-gated. 3 = quote only.
Free is $0; Scale is published at $4 per domain per month on annual billing; Agency pricing is custom. Source (2026-08-28)
Published: free plan, then flat monthly plans by email volume from $19/mo Source (2026-08-30)
10 = hosts the records for you. 6 = partial or add-on. 3 = you manage your own DNS.
No hosted authentication records are published; DNS provider integrations are used for setup workflows. Source (2026-08-28)
10 = a genuine free plan. 6 = time-limited trial only. 3 = no free access.
The ongoing Free plan covers one domain, 5,000 monthly emails, 30 days of history, and AI security analysis. Source (2026-08-28)
Free plan: one domain, up to 1,000 emails/mo, 14-day report history, no credit card, plus a 15-day full-product trial Source (2026-08-30)
10 = a real MSP program with multi-tenant management. 6 = partial. 3 = none.
Yes: the Agency plan has isolated sub-accounts, centralized billing, granular access, white-labeling, and a named contact. Source (2026-08-28)
How much work it takes to get a domain from p=none to p=reject. 10 = the platform (or the vendor's team) gets you there without manual DNS edits.
The platform provides AI recommendations and DNS-provider setup integrations, while hosted records and direct policy execution are not published. Source (2026-08-28)
The DMARC Agent detects when a domain's authentication and alignment are ready for the next policy stage and proposes the move, but a human still approves and applies it, so it is not fully hands-off. Source (2026-07-29)
Reporting visibility vs remediation support
DMARCEye gives report data a useful explanation layer
DMARCEye's core product is a report-monitoring and domain-security workspace. Its public pages describe raw XML report parsing, dashboards, and three-level drill-downs from domain to sending service to individual server. The documentation adds a practical view of the report: compliance percentage, total reported mail, compliant and non-compliant counts, security recommendations, and a domain status panel for DMARC policy, SPF, and DKIM. For a team trying to understand who sends as its domain, that is substantial parity with Palisade's monitoring surface. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
The explanation layer is not limited to charts. DMARCEye says AI Security Analysis runs on every plan, including Free, and places plain-language summaries and prioritized recommendations on the dashboard. Bart answers questions about domains, failing senders, and the next step toward enforcement. That can reduce the time an operator spends translating an authentication result into a ticket or an internal update. Palisade's distinction is the next handoff: its agent investigates every sender and turns the evidence into the draft work and policy decision your team must approve. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
- No agent-led enforcement
- Sender and IP drill-downs
- Dashboard summaries and recommendations
- Agent drafts and proposes
- Agent analyzes reports
- Agent analyzes reports
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
AI access vs operator control
AI access is real parity, but the write boundary matters
DMARCEye has two separate AI entry points. Bart is the assistant inside the product, while the MCP server exposes account and report context to an external assistant such as Claude or ChatGPT. Its published MCP guide describes account summaries, sender and IP drill-downs, filtered reports, monitoring questions, team workflows, and email generation. An agency can query its portfolio without opening each client dashboard, which is a sensible fit for recurring reviews and triage. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
The agency documentation also states that MCP access uses existing authentication, respects sub-account permissions, and is read-only by default: the assistant cannot modify DNS or DMARC policies. DMARCEye's product pages do advertise policy management and one-click DNS setup to selected providers, so the operator can make changes through the product's controls. The important comparison is therefore not whether DMARCEye has AI, or whether it can help with policy work. It is whether you want an assistant that explains and queries the evidence while an operator applies the fix, or Palisade's agent that drafts the SPF and DKIM work and proposes each policy step for approval. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26) Source 3 (2026-08-26)
- Chat plus MCP access
- Agent investigates senders
Agency structure vs remediation workflow
Agency operations are a genuine DMARCEye strength
DMARCEye's Agency plan is not just a larger domain counter. The vendor describes isolated sub-accounts for each client, separate domains and reports, per-client team access, centralized billing, and a unified agency view. Its agency page also describes three commercial modes: clients can pay directly, the agency can aggregate usage for a volume discount, or the agency can prepay a pool of domains and email volume. The pricing page leaves those Agency rates custom, but the operating model itself is public and specific. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
The page also documents custom-logo white-labeling, a named contact for Agency onboarding and escalations, and portfolio-level MCP access that inherits each sub-account's permissions. Those details make DMARCEye a reasonable choice for an MSP that wants to package monitoring, alerts, and client reporting under one agency account. The public materials do not name ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations, so an MSP that needs those exact PSA destinations should verify the integration path before buying. Palisade offers those three native PSA integrations for MSP accounts and is built around a different labor reduction: the agent prepares the remediation work instead of leaving the agency to interpret every new sender finding. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
Native PSA integrations
Palisade imports client domains straight from these three. DMARCEye's own coverage is stated above, from their site.
- ConnectWise PSA
- Autotask
- HaloPSA
- Isolated agency sub-accounts
- Custom-logo branding
- Named PSA tools not advertised
- Multi-tenant client management
- Before-and-after white-label reports
- Native PSA integrations
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Domain-slot pricing vs volume pricing
Domain-slot pricing versus Palisade's two billing models
DMARCEye's Scale plan is straightforward to model once you understand the unit. The page prices it at $4 per domain per month, with up to 50 domains and a monthly email limit per domain. The documentation says each monitored domain consumes a slot, including a domain that is misconfigured or not yet receiving data; removing a domain releases the slot for reuse. That structure suits an internal team that wants to estimate cost from its active domain inventory, but it makes domain count and the published per-domain email limit the variables to check during onboarding. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
The pricing page currently creates one verification question: it lists 500,000 emails per month per Scale domain, while the homepage displayed 1,000,000 when both pages were checked on August 26, 2026. The Agency plan moves to custom limits and describes direct, aggregated, and prepaid volume modes. Palisade separates its models more sharply: internal IT teams use flat monthly email-volume tiers, while MSPs pay per client domain without client email metering. Compare not only the advertised subscription but also whether a client's campaign volume changes the cost underneath your managed-service margin. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
What each side charges
Three points on each published range: the cheapest plan, one in the middle, and the top of what the vendor publishes. Every plan on both sides is in the pricing section further down.
- Free$0
1 domain, 5,000 emails per month, 30 days of data history, AI security analysis, and blacklist monitoring
- Scale$4 per domain per month ($48 per year)
Up to 50 domains, 500,000 emails per month per domain, 1 year of data history, AI analysis, in-app AI chat, sender geolocation, MCP server, smart alerts, email reports, and team collaboration
- AgencyCustom per month or year
Custom domain and email limits, unlimited data history, everything in Scale, multi-tenant architecture, and API access
- Free$0
1 domain, your own, capped at 1,000 emails/mo
- IT teams: up to 500,000 emails/mo$59/mo ($47/mo billed annually)
Same product: 6 set-up domains, pick the tier that matches your sending
- Enterprise (more than 2.5M / month)Custom
Custom volume, retention, and terms
- Custom thresholds and emails
- Not on every plan
- Not on every plan
- Agent flags new tickets
- Unlimited on paid plans
- API on every plan
Operator workflow vs agent-led remediation
Where the enforcement work lands
DMARCEye's documented workflow is connect, monitor, and troubleshoot. You add a domain, follow guided DNS instructions, collect DMARC reports, inspect senders and authentication results, and use recommendations to decide what to fix. Its policy-management page says a ready record can be published with one-click DNS setup to selected providers. That is a coherent operator-led workflow, and it is a good fit for a team that wants the dashboard and the final DNS decision to remain in the same human-controlled loop. Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
Palisade is aimed at the team that wants the loop prepared for it. Its agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, detects policy readiness, and proposes each step toward p=reject; you approve before anything ships. Both products can give an operator visibility and recommendations, and both can be part of a cautious migration. The choice is narrower than a generic feature checklist: do you want DMARCEye's report-and-assist workflow, including its strong AI query layer, or do you want the agent to carry the investigation and configuration queue across your domains while your team reviews the proposed changes? Source (2026-08-26) Source 2 (2026-08-26)
- Policy controls and DNS publishing
- Guided setup and status
- Agent drafts approved changes
- Agent drafts configuration fixes
- Investigates. Works out what is sending as your domain, and which of it is legitimate.
- Drafts the fix. Prepares the SPF and DKIM record changes each sender needs, rather than describing them.
- Proposes the policy step. Moves toward p=reject when the evidence supports it. You approve before anything ships.
Dashboard access vs programmatic access
DMARCEye publishes an Agency REST API and paid-plan MCP server
DMARCEye publishes a REST API reference with bearer-token authentication and endpoints for domains and account reports. Its pricing page lists API access on Agency, while Scale and Agency include its MCP server. The vendor also advertises AI Security Analysis for plain-language summaries and prioritized recommendations, Bart for in-app report questions, and daily or weekly summary reports sent by email. These published paths let an operator query or receive DMARC information without opening the dashboard. Source (2026-08-27) Source 2 (2026-08-27) Source 3 (2026-08-27) Source 4 (2026-08-27)
Palisade publishes an MCP server and a REST API. Its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step. A human approves before anything ships.
Reachable from your own AI tools
Palisade's MCP server exposes 30 tools over OAuth, so the assistant your team already uses can read domains, pull the exact records to publish and work the task queue. These are the clients the connection guide walks through.
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Cursor
- Windsurf
- Any MCP client
- Agency REST API
- Paid-plan MCP server
- AI analysis and chat
- REST API published
- MCP server published
- No in-app chat; agent drafts fixes
Still deciding between DMARCEye and Palisade? See what changes with Palisade.
1 domain free up to 1,000 emails/month
Microsoft 365
Zoho Mail
The agent does the heavy lifting
Sources identified, SPF and DKIM fixes drafted, each policy step proposed. You approve; nothing ships on its own.
Connect your AI with MCP
30 tools over MCP, so your assistant reads your domains and works the queue.
Connect your DNS manager directly
Approved records go into your own zone at your own provider, across 64. No credentials reach us.
“We evaluated many DMARC providers before choosing Palisade. The quality of their product, the responsiveness and friendliness of their team and their rapid progress on their product roadmap made it a no-brainer for us to move forward.”
DMARCEye pricing explained (and how Palisade compares)
DMARCEye publishes a Free plan, a per-domain Scale plan, and a custom Agency plan. The pricing page showed these terms when checked on August 26, 2026; the limits below use that page as the primary pricing source.
What you'd actually pay
The same five buyer sizes on every comparison, so a shape carries from one page to the next.
1 domain, up to 1,000 emails a month
1 domain, 5,000 emails per month
2 set-up domains, up to 100K emails a month
Scale annual plan: 1 to 50 domains, 500,000 emails per month per domain; no 2-domain total is published
10 set-up domains, up to 1M emails a month
Scale annual plan: up to 50 domains, 500,000 emails per month per domain; no 10-domain total is published
20 set-up domains, up to 2.5M emails a month
Scale annual plan: up to 50 domains, 500,000 emails per month per domain; no 20-domain total is published
Client domains under management, any volume
Agency: custom domain and email limits; rates are not published
Palisade’s figures are derived from its published tiers. DMARCEye figures read from their pricing page on 2026-08-28. Plans and prices may have changed since.
How DMARCEye prices
- The pricing page says the 14-day trial is available on all paid plans with no credit card required, and the account converts to Free after the trial if no paid plan is selected.
- Scale billing is based on domain slots. DMARCEye says each monitored domain uses one slot, and removing a domain frees the slot for reuse; an annual-plan addition can be charged pro rata.
- The current pricing page lists 500,000 emails per month per Scale domain. The homepage displayed 1,000,000 emails per month per domain when checked the same day, so confirm the live limit before purchase.
- The Agency page describes three client-billing modes: direct pay-as-you-go, centrally billed usage with a volume discount, and a prepaid pool. It does not publish Agency rates.
How Palisade prices
- Palisade's Free plan covers one domain and up to 1,000 emails per month. Paid IT-team plans are flat monthly prices sized by email volume from $19/month, with 20% off on annual billing.
- Palisade paid IT tiers cap set-up domains at 2, 3, 6, 10, or 20 by volume tier; adding domains is free and unlimited, and only set-up domains count against the tier.
- Palisade MSP pricing is quoted per client domain, with a rate that improves as your portfolio grows. Client email volume is not metered, and your own MSP domain is included as a free Not-For-Resale license.
- Palisade's 15-day full-product trial requires no credit card. API access is included on every plan, and the agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes policy steps for approval.
DMARCEye pricing read from their public pricing page on 2026-08-26.Plans and prices may have changed since.
Try Palisade free on one domain, or start a 15-day full-product trial with no credit card.
What each one covers, and where it stops
Published facts only, read from each vendor's own material. Neither column describes a hands-on trial, because we have not run one.
DMARCEye is a DMARC monitoring and management platform that turns XML reports into dashboards, recommendations, AI chat, and agency workflows. Its monitoring surface includes domain, sender, and IP drill-downs, authentication results, and status views for DMARC, SPF, and DKIM. It is aimed at teams that need to understand and manage their sending domains.
For agency and MSP use, DMARCEye publishes isolated client sub-accounts, per-client access, centralized billing, and a unified portfolio view. Its pricing offers a Free plan, a per-domain Scale plan, and a custom Agency plan. The product pairs policy controls and selected-provider DNS publishing with an operator-led workflow for authentication and policy decisions.
Palisade is built around an agent that does the DMARC work rather than reporting on it. It identifies every sending source, drafts the SPF and DKIM changes each one needs, and proposes the next policy step when the evidence supports it.
The agent investigates every sender, drafts every fix, and proposes each policy step, you approve before anything ships.
- Provides sender and IP drill-downs for DMARC report monitoring
- Turns report data into dashboard summaries and prioritized recommendations
- Offers in-app chat plus MCP access to live DMARC data
- Supports policy controls and DNS publishing to selected providers
- The agent investigates senders and drafts the fix, so the work arrives prepared rather than as a list of findings
- Hosted SPF, DKIM and DMARC on redundant managed DNS, so an approved change can be carried out rather than handed off
- Portfolio workflow for MSPs, with ConnectWise, HaloPSA and Autotask integrations and a free NFR domain
- An MCP server and a REST API, so the same data and workflow are reachable from the AI tools a team already uses
- Does not advertise an agent-led enforcement workflow that drafts fixes and carries each policy step toward p=reject
- Does not advertise an unreviewed AI write path for DNS or DMARC policies
- Does not advertise unlimited data history on every plan
- Does not advertise API access on every plan
- Does not advertise named ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations
- Every policy change waits for a human approval, by design: nothing ships on the agent's own authority
- MSP pricing is quoted per client domain rather than published as a rate card
- Plans are sized by monthly email volume, so a low-domain, high-volume sender lands on a higher tier than domain count alone suggests
- Starts at
- $0
- Free tier
- 1 domain, 5,000 emails/month
- Scale price
- $4 per domain/month
- Paid-plan trial
- 14 days
- Data retention
- 30 days Free; 1 year Scale
- Starts at
- Free, then $19/mo
- Free tier
- 1 domain, up to 1,000 emails/month
- Trial
- 15 days, full product, no credit card
- MSP model
- Quoted per client domain, portfolio-based
“Palisade made it so easy for us to get our blue verified checkmark and achieve our BIMI compliance”
Sources and further reading
Source checks run through 2026-08-26; every entry keeps its individual check date.
- DMARCEye homepage: reporting, AI, workflow, and plan overview
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARCEye features: reporting, policy management, AI, alerts, and agency account
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARCEye pricing: plan limits, prices, trial, and billing FAQ
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARCEye documentation: setup, monitoring, and AI recommendations
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARCEye report documentation: drill-downs and security status
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARCEye Agency plan: multi-tenancy, billing, white-labeling, and MCP
Checked 2026-08-26
- DMARCEye homepage: AI, MCP, and paid-plan overview
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARCEye features: AI Security Analysis and Bart chat
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARCEye pricing: API, MCP, and email-report plan access
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARCEye Agency plan: portfolio MCP access
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARCEye MCP guide: supported assistant workflows
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARCEye documentation: product setup and AI recommendations
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARCEye report documentation: dashboard drill-downs
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARCEye API reference: authenticated domain and report endpoints
Checked 2026-08-27
- DMARCEye notification settings: scheduled email reports
Checked 2026-08-27
Palisade vs DMARCEye: FAQ
What is the main difference between DMARCEye and Palisade?
DMARCEye organizes DMARC reports into dashboards, recommendations, AI chat, MCP queries, policy controls, and agency workflows. Palisade is agentic: its agent investigates senders, drafts SPF and DKIM fixes, and proposes each policy step toward p=reject while your team approves before anything ships.
Does DMARCEye have an AI enforcement agent?
DMARCEye advertises AI Security Analysis, Bart in-app chat, MCP access, and recommendations. Its agency documentation says MCP is read-only by default and cannot modify DNS or DMARC policies. The public pages do not advertise an agent that drafts and carries each enforcement step toward p=reject. Palisade's agent owns that investigation and drafting loop, with approval before changes ship.
Does DMARCEye offer multi-tenant agency management?
Yes. DMARCEye's Agency plan describes isolated client sub-accounts, per-client access, centralized billing, role-based permissions, custom-logo white-labeling, and portfolio-level MCP access. Agency pricing is custom. The public pages do not name ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integrations, so verify those destinations if they are required for your service desk.
How much does DMARCEye cost?
The pricing page checked on August 26, 2026 lists Free at $0, Scale at $4 per domain per month or $48 per year, and Agency as custom. Free includes one domain, 5,000 emails per month, and 30 days of history. Scale lists up to 50 domains, a per-domain email limit, and one year of history. Confirm the live Scale email limit because the homepage and pricing page displayed different figures when checked the same day.
Is there a free DMARCEye trial?
Yes. DMARCEye says paid plans include a 14-day trial with no credit card required, and the account converts to the Free plan after the trial if you do not select a paid plan. Its Free plan covers one domain and 5,000 emails per month. Palisade offers a separate 15-day full-product trial with no credit card required.
Can I connect DMARCEye to Claude or ChatGPT?
Yes. DMARCEye documents a native MCP server for connecting Claude, ChatGPT, or another compatible assistant to live DMARC data. The agency page says the connection respects sub-account permissions and is read-only by default, so the assistant can query and summarize data but cannot modify DNS or DMARC policies through that MCP connection.
Can I run DMARCEye and Palisade at the same time?
Yes. DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so you can send reports to both platforms during an evaluation window. Keep policy changes coordinated, compare sender and alignment findings, and move the reporting destination fully when your team is ready. If you use DMARCEye's DNS setup controls during the overlap, record which platform owns each change before tightening policy.
Switching from DMARCEye takes three steps
- 1
Batch-import your domains
Bring your client domains into Palisade in bulk, or let your ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or Autotask integration sync them automatically.
- 2
Run both platforms in parallel
DMARC reporting supports multiple recipients, so Palisade and DMARCEye receive the same reports during the overlap window. Nothing breaks while you compare.
- 3
Cut DNS over on your schedule
Point records at Palisade's hosted infrastructure (redundant managed DNS), then retire the old setup when you're satisfied.
Our onboarding team handles the technical transition with you.
Competitor information on this page was last reviewed against public sources on 2026-08-26. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.